U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 15, 2024 01:19 PM UTC

Heidi Ganahl's Confusing Affirmations on Budget Cuts

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

If Heidi Ganahl thinks you are doing something right, you really might want to reassess your plans.

The 2022 Republican nominee for Governor, who lost to incumbent Democrat Jared Polis by nearly 20 points, is inarguably the worst statewide candidate in Colorado history. But rather than allow her ignominy to fade from memory, Ganahl can’t stop not stopping making ridiculous statements about everything from furries to pyramid schemes. Only someone as obtuse as Ganahl could see something that another politician is doing and think, “Hey, I had that same idea one time!”

President-elect Donald Trump recently announced that he was appointing billionaire weirdo Elon Musk and onetime Presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy to head the made-up “Department of Government Efficiency” (a not-so-hilarious reference to “DOGE Coins”) to find ways to shrink government spending.

As CBS News reports, the new sorta-official government slashing organization is going to start slashing government by first…expanding it:

The new Department of Government Efficiency, a group created by President-elect Donald Trump with the task of identifying ways to cut federal spending and headed by billionaires Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, is already taking resumes.

The request for job applicants was posted Thursday by the new X account for DOGE, which despite its heady mission isn’t an official government department. In his statement on Tuesday announcing the effort, Trump described Musk and Ramaswamy’s role as providing “advice and guidance from outside of government.”

It’s unclear where the funding for DOGE will come from or the size of its budget, as well as whether Musk, the world’s richest person, and Ramaswamy, who has an estimated net worth of $1 billion, will be paid for their efforts. The Trump campaign didn’t respond to a request for information…

…The post didn’t disclose the specific educational or career experience it is looking for in applicants. Instead, it described the kind of person they want to hire: “We need super high-IQ small-government revolutionaries willing to work 80+ hours per week on unglamorous cost-cutting.”

It added that it doesn’t want “more part-time idea generators.”

This is as silly as the initial idea of hiring TWO PEOPLE to suggest spending cuts, but Ganahl is thrilled that the news might reflect well on her:

We don’t recall anyone calling Ganahl’s cost-cutting plans “bullshit” — though that would have been a fair assessment. Either way, Ganahl’s math definitely needs work:

As most middle school students understand, cutting 10% per year for four years does NOT add up to a 40% reduction; it just means you have made 10% annual cuts four times.

Anyway, Ganahl thinks that the mere suggestion of this “DOGE” thingy is proof that her cost-cutting proposal was a valid idea. But as George Will writes for The Washington Post, there’s a big difference between talking about cutting government spending and actually making it work in reality:

Musk says he can cut “at least” $2 trillion from federal spending — say, one dollar in three. (Fiscal 2024 spending: $6.75 trillion.) Well.

Debt service (13.1 percent of fiscal 2024 spending) is not optional and is larger than defense (12.9 percent), which Trump wants to increase. Entitlements (principally Social Security and Medicare) are 34.6 percent and by Trumpian fiat are sacrosanct. So, Musk’s promise is to cut about 30 percent of the total budget from a roughly 40 percent portion of the budget, politics be damned…[Pols emphasis]

…Musk might do some good; Trump’s tariffs will do nothing but harm. Both, however, could cause Congress to rethink its decades of delegating dangerous discretion to presidents. They can unilaterally wreck international commerce and domestic prosperity with vague incantations about “national security” and “unfair” practices.

Businesspeople who get involved in politics like to say that government should be run more like a business, which is always a silly thing to say because government — by design — is not intended to generate a profit. This is sort of like saying that a basketball team should be coached like a football team, when the only thing the two have in common is the word “ball.”

Perhaps George Will is wrong and the “DOGE” will figure out a way to prove Ganahl correct. Accomplishing the latter would be quite the feat on its own.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Heidi Ganahl’s Confusing Affirmations on Budget Cuts

  1. I remember a town hall where the interviewer called her ideas on crime bullshit. Her response from what I recall was saying something about her dad 

      1. I was thinking maybe Bronco’s mascot?  

        (I swear to dog, every time I see her picture, I can hear that Young Frankenstein “Frau Blucher” neighing somewhere off in the distance.)

  2. Republicans specialize in lazy governing. Instead of analyzing and auditing government services to evaluate the success of programs and determine possible cost-saving measures, they just throw out percentages they're going to cut. Anyone can play that game! And pay attention: Business people who really know what they're doing are successful. But lots of the "business people" who dabble in governing are people like Trump who has ruined multiple businesses, and has gone bankrupt multiple times. 

  3. Neither Musk OR Ramaswamy have been in federal elected office — neither has worked for the government — and neither has much in the way of negotiating with members of Congress.

    Ever watch someone try to cut AMTRAK or US Postal Service subsidies, and thus cut service?  Or suggest we could save money by closing military bases or national parks?

    As one person suggested, Elon Musk is likely to be given a very, VERY public education.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

51 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!