“Better to fight for something than live for nothing.”
–George S. Patton
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Gov. Polis Partly Walks Back Ill-Advised RFK Jr. Love
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Heidi Ganahl’s Confusing Affirmations on Budget Cuts
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
How about starting by suing Amendment 80 supporters. You want a fight they took your likeness and lied about what you said… What are you going to do? Nothing.
"Microtargeting and Identity Politics Killed the Democratic Brand." Rachel Bitecofer's first post-election discussion.
Bitecofer agrees that focusing on identity politics (socio-cultural) messaging has become problematic for the Democratic Party. Note that Republican do a lot of identity politics as well, think evangelicals & gun fetishists. HOWEVER, Identity POLICIES are not the issue – people broadly support identiy policies like non-descrimination.
The problem Bitecofer sees is the brand management of the Democratic Party as a whole.
As for me, ParkHill… I would still argue that the ability of the Republican propaganda machine to distract and reach low-information voters is the biggest part of the problem. I mean, liberal support for gay rights was smothered by Republican propaganda into "trans operations in prisons". That may be stupid, but it worked.
Very well worth reading the whole article. Why & how on earth are the Republicans seen as the "Party of the working class":
There are many voters who respond to the most immediate events in their lives. Things that are good, they have "earned." Things that are bad are the fault of someone else — and too often that someone else is the political party "in charge." And the "party in charge" is whoever is President — no matter how much support is available in Congress or from the Courts.
So, if people focus on gasoline prices, the "official" data shows
Oct 26, 2020
$2.143
Oct 28, 2024
$3.097
That $0.95 rise is what people have in mind — no awarness that $2.14 in 2020 would have been $2.59 in 2024 — so about half the difference is "inflation" — and income went up over 20% in those 4 years. And no awareness that Presidents have relatively little say about the price of gasoline (or anything else).