U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 16, 2024 11:25 AM UTC

We're Getting Nothing for Christmas; House Republicans are Mad

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

It’s not your fault; you haven’t been bad.

House Republicans are scrambling (again) to figure out a way to fund the government (again) before an end-of-week deadline. As The Hill newspaper reports:

Congressional negotiators are struggling to reach a deal to keep the government’s lights on past Dec. 20.

Text of a continuing resolution (CR) for a government funding package was expected Sunday ahead of the looming shutdown deadline.

But lawmakers failed to release the text, with economic assistance for farmers emerging as an apparent last-minute sticking point. [Pols emphasis]

Key players had indicated this week that the forthcoming CR, which keeps the government funded at current levels, would also include another one-year extension of the 2018 farm bill, as both sides have struggled to agree on a longer-term plan. But lawmakers had also ramped up talks of potential add-ons to provide economic assistance for farmers as part of the broader funding plan.

Dumb and dumberer

House Speaker Mike Johnson is now faced with needing the help of House Democrats (again) in order to pass a continuing resolution to fund the federal government after he bungled negotiations related to farmer assistance. As POLITICO explains:

Johnson is facing a brewing rebellion from farm district Republicans after congressional leaders failed to secure an agreement to add economic aid for farmers to the next stop-gap spending bill.

The threat of a new wave of GOP defections among farm district Republicans presents a fresh challenge for Johnson, who is already navigating a narrow majority and opposition from his own right flank as he tries to fund the government before a shutdown Dec. 21. And it will likely force the speaker to find more Democratic votes before the current funding runs out Friday.

The speaker’s team has been exploring other options to add the farm aid into the stopgap, but Democrats are demanding their own additions in return. As Johnson attended the Army-Navy football game with President-elect Donald Trump Saturday, his team quietly worked to hold off any more GOP defections, according to three people familiar with the private conversations who were granted anonymity to discuss them. The last-minute snags are pushing release of the stopgap into Monday, despite lawmakers hoping they could circulate the text Sunday.

GOP leaders have told lawmakers that Johnson wants to pass the entire funding measure and disaster package together, via suspension, according to two other people familiar with the matter. But that process requires a two-thirds majority, making the ag state Republicans’ votes even more critical.

House Agriculture Chair G.T. Thompson (R-Pa.) said Saturday that he will oppose any spending measure that leaves out the billions in extra aid farm state Republicans were seeking for farmers still reeling from Donald Trump’s 2018 trade war, inflation, a delayed five-year farm bill reauthorization and a raft of other economic pressures. Republicans in agriculture-heavy states and some Democrats have warned about a crippling economic crisis hitting rural America, which overwhelmingly supported Trump in the last election. [Pols emphasis]

[SIDE NOTE: You’re telling us that people in agriculture-heavy states who backed Donald Trump for President did so despite the fact that his policies screwed them once before and are likely to do so again? Weird!]

Back to POLITICO:

Farm district Republicans are not only incensed with Democrats for the deal’s collapse, but also with their own GOP leaders who opposed adding $14 billion in Inflation Reduction Act climate conservation funding into the farm bill budget for years to come. Johnson privately argued a majority of the GOP conference opposed such a move. He’s under intense pressure from ultraconservatives as his speakership hangs in the balance. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell also shocked Republicans by digging in on the matter in the final hours. [Pols emphasis]

The stopgap measure will still include a clean, one-year farm bill extension, but possibly without any additional economic aid or other add-ons agriculture lawmakers were seeking.

Speaker Johnson has regularly struggled to get Republicans on board with funding the federal government — often because of absurd unrelated demands — and has often needed the help of House Democrats to get something done. This tends to happen at the same time that Republicans try to blame Democrats for their inability to corral their own cats; it’s a ridiculous notion to blame the minority for the failures of the majority.

Have fun with Speaker Johnson!

It’s also worth noting that a successful continuing resolution would only fund the federal government until March, which will complicate President-elect Trump’s plans for his first 100 days in office — particularly his boasting about fighting inflation. As CNN noted last week, Trump is already walking back his once-rosy economic predictions:

“When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on day one,” Trump continued. “We will drill, baby, drill,” he said, referring to increasing domestic oil production. “That’s going to bring down prices of everything.”…

“It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up,” Trump said in his Time Magazine “Person of the Year” interview published Thursday, referring to grocery prices. “You know, it’s very hard…But I think that they will. I think that energy is going to bring them down.” [Pols emphasis]

Trump’s plan is to drill more for oil and natural gas — nevermind that the United States currently produces more oil than any other nation in history — and somehow use that revenue to lower the cost of groceries. (Don’t look at us to explain).

Republicans won’t officially take control of both chambers of Congress and the White House until early next year. But as we’ve seen for the last two years in the House, the problem has never been that we have too few Republicans in charge.

Comments

9 thoughts on “We’re Getting Nothing for Christmas; House Republicans are Mad

  1. The Dems will of course cave and bail the GOP out.  Even as the GOP blames Dems for everything and threatens to jail them.

    It is an extremely weird form of battered spouse syndrome.

    1. If the Democratic House minority can get Seeker Johnson to offer a clean CR for the remainder of FY2025, I think is worth doing. 

      If there is a chance to get an extension of the existing Farm Bill authorization, I think that is better than the alternative of no action.  And if farmers want more, there ought to be a vote for their proposal.  Separate from maintaining the status quo government.

      Rep. Jeffries has another chance to show that Democrats are the responsible ruling party.  Getting things done while the Senate is still led by Sen. Schumer and President Biden is still the one signing legislation offers possibilities.  Most importantly, it provides an alternative to keep the lights on while Republicans demonstrate they cannot even muster a majority to pass a Reconciliation Bill.

       

      1. Rep. Jeffries has another chance to show that Democrats are the responsible ruling party. 

        Except they do not get any credit from the voters for that – the voters just told us how much they value responsible ruling parties (hint: not at all) – and in the process, the Dems end up legitimizing the fascists and drawing attention away from the right wing whackos in the House.

        It is very costly politically and moves nothing of importance forward, only buys some time while allowing the GOP to pretend they are interested in governing.

        Our only hope is to let the public see what they bought, in all its dysfunctional glory.

        1. So you think it would be good to have a government shutdown while Biden is President and Schumer is Majority Leader?  That is going to somehow show that Republicans are the problem?????

          My sense of the 2024 Presidential loss leans more on the problem of low voter satisfacction with what they saw as outcomes of Biden's policies, Biden dropping out due to questions of his ability, and Harris being unable to articulate a solid explanation of why she shouldn't be blamed, why she did not criticize Biden's performance, or clarify and present a credible alternative plan to deal with key issues. 

          There's a solid base of opposition to Democratic policies and the Democratic label — maybe 45% of the voters.  There's a solid base of support, too.  But there are a few undecided voters looking at "what's in it for me" and a larger number of potential voters who may or may not come out — and there were a whole lot more potential Democrats staying home.  In something like 90% of US counties, Harris wound up with fewer votes than 2020 Biden. 

          I don't understand how those who were nonvoters in 2024 are going to be impressed by Democrats collaborating in a government shutdown. If they didn't see the benefits of Democratic programs that weren't fully showing their pay-offs yet, and thus didn't come out to vote, why would not seeing government benefits inspire them to come out for Democrats in 2026?

          1. So you think it would be good to have a government shutdown while Biden is President and Schumer is Majority Leader? 

             

            I think if the Dems had any chops, they would be able to pin the blame where it belongs: on the Republicans.

            I disagree with your characterization of that as collaborating in a shutdown, in fact they are getting out of the way of a clown car.  Only Dems can figure out how to get blamed for that again and again.  It has to stop.

            They did this once, they stood up to Gingrich and he backed down.  This only works if the clowns believe the Dems won’t fold and save them again.

            PS wth does this have to do with Schumer?  This is about the House, and the GOP House Speaker.  That is where the blame should be pinned.

            1. Gingrich was in the late 1990s. In recent times, the Dems have shown a decided weakness in messaging and being beholden to special interests. As one example, the Dems got eaten alive over the trangender kids issue. I know certain progressives here don't want to hear that, but it is the reality.

              Note that I'm not sharing my personal opinion here. But I am very aware of the issue for 18 and over adults since I was working in social services in Colorado when Dr. Stanley Biber made Trinidad, CO the sex-change capitol of the country.

              1. It sounds like you have internalized the lesson that Democrats are doomed to fail.

                This is not an unreasonable conclusion. However, the appropriate response to that reality is not to legitimize fascists or continue to helicopter in and help them to appear to be competent despite their inherent dysfunction and incoherence.  The appropriate strategy is to cede the battlefield, retreat, and regroup.

                1. "it sounds like you have internalized….." Not really. Project much?

                  Remembering the noteworthy comment, I think, from long time Dem strategist, James Carville: "it's the economy, stupid."

                  1. Project much?

                     

                    Nah, I guess I was sorta responding to both you and John at the same time, and to a fairly prevalent theme among many Democrats – who have become hampered by limited imaginations and low expectations, due to the track record of Dems repeatedly getting beat on basic retail politics.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

47 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!