In blue-trending Jefferson County, once considered a bellwether for the state’s evolution from red to blue and today reflecting the state’s overall Democratic dominance at the polls, the local Republican Party has not been what you’d call a competitive political organization, staffed by crackpots like the immediate former chairwoman of the JeffCo GOP Nancy Pallozzi whose sole claim to fame was a name similar to that of the former Democratic House Speaker. The biggest news for the JeffCo GOP in recent years was the abrupt cancellation of a fundraiser starring former South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem just days after her disclosure of having killed a literal puppy, which helped tank Noem’s veep aspirations but apparently made her a great candidate to lead the Department of Homeland Security.
But as 9NEWS’ Kyle Clark reported last night, the new leader of the Jefferson County Republicans has proposed…a different approach than his predecessor Nancy Pallozzi. You might call it more direct, and definitely more in keeping with the way Secretary Noem deals with her dog problems:
The newly-elected chairman of the Jefferson County Republican Party is a convicted felon, who warned during the Biden administration that “it’s almost time to switch from ballots to bullets.”
Rich Wyatt replaces outgoing chairwoman Nancy Pallozzi, who did not seek another term.
Pallozzi became a target of far-right Republicans for leading a failed attempt to remove Colorado Republican Party Chairman Dave Williams after Williams called for the burning of all pride flags…
As one of the early leaders in the ultimately unsuccessful plot to oust Colorado Republican Party chairman Dave Williams, Pallozzi made herself persona non grata with the party’s MAGA wing, which led to her decision to not seek another term. The new chairman, however, is a much better fit for today’s radicalized Republican Party.
With one caveat: in 2018, several years before he endorsed the switch from “ballots to bullets,” Pallozzi’s successor Rich Wyatt pled guilty to felony firearms charges that in theory would make it more difficult for Wyatt to weaponize his politics. We haven’t tried to know for sure, but it makes sense that armed revolution can only get so far with a BB gun.
And perhaps most importantly, the side that threatened a civil war if they lost the election won the election. It will be at least a few years before this threat comes around again.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JD Vance
IN: Bennet, Hick Hard “NO” On Republican Spending Resolution
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Bennet, Hick Hard “NO” On Republican Spending Resolution
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Bennet, Hick Hard “NO” On Republican Spending Resolution
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Wonder when the photo was taken. Felon with a Firearm federal law
Seems like he has a weapon under "immediate control" ….
18 USC section 922(g)(1) is the “felon-in-possession” statute. Though it actually doesn’t say felon, but instead prohibits firearms (or ammunition) possession by anyone “who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.” Generally, crimes punishable by more than a year are felonies, but not always. There’s a recent en banc (i.e., full court) decision from the Third Circuit, Range v. AG, where someone who was convicted of nonviolent misdemeanors punishable by more than a year in prison challenged the statute as applied to him. The Third Circuit held that the law violated the Second Amendment as applied to Range. There is a pending case in the Tenth Circuit (our circuit), Vincent, that is on remand from the Supreme Court and will address a similar challenge to section 922(g)(1). Supplemental briefing is finished in that case, and we’re just waiting for the Tenth Circuit to rule. While I don’t agree with the case law, Wyatt may be able to challenge the statute as applied to him, should anyone try to enforce it against him. Though i wouldn’t expect the trump nonministration to enforce gun laws against someone like Wyatt (i.e., white and a MAGAt).
UPDATE: The Tenth Circuit decided Vincent yesterday (Feb. 11) and upheld the law against the as-applied challenge. The court re-affirmed its prior precedent. So for now, 922(g)(1) clearly bars former felons from possessing firearms or ammunition in the Tenth Circuit.
I guess us Dems in Jeffco should show up in body armor, just in case.
Whatever our fashion choices, we Dems need to just SHOW UP.
Will he be visiting the homes of registered Republicans, with his apparently illegal gun visible, for fund raising?
You'll just have to get a cute RINO lawn gnome to serve as a secret signal to keep the crazies away. Oh, wait… the crazies might hate RINOs more than DemocRats.
Why don't Democrats have someone like that? We need to stop fighting to last war, people don't like a Kamala Harris with experience as a prosecutor, a senator… People want a criminal who is a clear threat to the other side!