DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) Brian Mason
60%↑
30%↑
20%↓
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%↑
30%
20%↓
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Manny Rutinel
(D) Yadira Caraveo
45%↓
40%↑
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 21, 2025 03:08 PM UTC
10 Comments
considering how many Veterans we have in this state, this is going to create a freakin' BOOM in small businesses devoted to training these freaky Gundamentalists in actual firearm safety and proper weapons handling.
We've been making this point ever since the bill was amended to add the training requirement. This is potentially a gold mine for qualified firearms instructors.
Negev and WhiskeyLimaJuliet should be happy with this bill, then.
Final test: Field strip the weapon wearing a blindfold, put it back together fire 100 and tear down clean and reassemble. Sounds reasonable to me. That would be good civilian level.
So you're celebrating the redirection of funds from the Outdoor Recreation Fund that is suppose to maintain our state parks to a frankenstien bill that is going to do nothing to decrease violence in the state. Not sure what to say on that. Guess you deserve a pat on the back.
Suggest that you read the bill's fiscal note in its entirety. Any redirected cash funds must eventually be replaced, as I read it.
Wow, typical response, no number no data, just read the bill! Believe me I have read and dissected this bill. The final fiscal note is a joke and is not based in reality. Based on the numbers given 50,000 taking the class, and 3 FTEs to process everything (let me note that those 3 FTEs include building and setting up the system in the first year). Using simple math, that means 1 person is going to have to process 66 people per day to meet those numbers (using 251 working days in the year). And I don't think that 50,000 is even a true number, CBI handled 361,974 background checks in 2023 and 338,863 in 2024. CPW is allowed to transfer money for the next 5 years out of the Outdoor recreation fund to a new fund, and then transfer money back. By the end of the 5 year they are suppose to transfer the same amount back. But looking at the numbers I see no way that is going to be possible. Just because the bill says it, doesn't make it true. And by statute CRS 33-10-111, the Outdoor fund does not have gun control listed in it's uses.
Not my problem if you don't like the fiscal note. But feel free to testify against the bill if public comment is still being taken. Otherwise, one could expect Rocky Montain Gun Owners to file a lawsuit if the bill passes and the Governor signs it. You can contribute to RMGO's legal fees.
Like I said you’re celebrating them draining money from the Outdoor Park fund. There is going to be negative cash flow in that fund and that is going to cause our parks to suffer.
And FYI I’m on record testifying a number of times, but based on comments from the general assembly anyone against this bill is trash and they don’t care.
Not celebrating anything here, dude. That's just you trying to project. Have a nice day.