U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 26, 2025 10:11 AM UTC

Like It Or Not, "Signalgate" Explodes Into Major Political Crisis For Trump

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
DNI Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe tell lies yesterday.

As a third day dawned on the rapidly escalating scandal consuming Washington, D.C. after top Trump administration officials used a commercial chat app to discuss highly classified plans for impending military against against Yemen while inadvertently including the editor of The Atlantic in the discussion, despite valiant attempts by President Donald Trump and a phalanx of Republican subordinate sycophants on cable news trying to downplay the incident, it’s not going away.

In fact, it’s getting worse by the hour.

After every Republican excusemaker from Trump down the pecking order denied that any classified information was sent via Signal in this ad hoc chat channel, Politico reports today via further disclosure by The Atlantic that is very plainly not the case:

Since The Atlantic first reported Monday that top administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and national security adviser Mike Waltz, were using a Signal chat to discuss the attack earlier in March, President Donald Trump and others have attacked the credibility of the magazine’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, who was mistakenly added to the group chat and saw its contents sent out in real time. They also claimed that neither “war plans” nor classified information was shared in the chat.

Not all the messages were released — the magazine opted not to release the name of a CIA intelligence officer serving as chief of staff to CIA Director John Ratcliffe — but The Atlantic published most of them in image form. The messages show detailed information about the kinds of planes used to strike Houthi militants and the timetable for the attack. They also show unvarnished opinions from top Trump administration officials on the strategic benefits of attacking the Houthis and supporting European trade.

In one message, Hegseth, who has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and attacked Goldberg for his reporting, outlined that F-18s and drones would launch an attack beginning at 2:10 p.m. and offered specific information about the types of missiles that would be dropped. It outlined the pace of the strike as well. As Goldberg and The Atlantic reporter Shane Harris wrote Wednesday, the specificity of the message could have imperiled the safety of U.S. pilots had it fallen into the wrong hands. [Pols emphasis]

The Atlantic’s publication of obviously secret details of the attack on Yemen sent over this Signal chat is a devastating blow to the administration’s credibility after their insistence that no such information was transmitted through the app, including in testimony before the Senate Select Intelligence Committee. As a result, Colorado Democrats today are upgrading their calls for “accountability” to specific demands that both National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth resign:

Today, Congresswoman Diana DeGette (CO-01) released the following statement calling for Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and National Security Advisory Michael Waltz to resign after the full content of the Signal chat involving multiple other high-ranking Trump administration officials was released to the public.

“The level of incompetence shown by the Secretary of Defense and National Security Advisor is staggering. This is a systemic failure by some of the highest-ranking officials in our government, and if the information shared on this unsecured platform fell into the hands of an adversary, it would have put American servicemembers’ lives at risk. There must be accountability, and their failure to take responsibility while gaslighting the public about what exactly happened demands answers.

“At a minimum, Pete Hegseth and Michael Waltz must resign. There must be a full investigation into whether Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe committed perjury, and if any other criminal activity occurred. It may well be that all of these officials need to be fired.”

Sen. Michael Bennet says it flat out today: DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s gotta go.

Maybe to jail.

In an open Intelligence Committee hearing yesterday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said that Trump administration officials did not discuss any classified information – or information on weapons packages, targets, or timing – in their Signal group chat coordinating U.S. strikes on Yemen. As the chat’s transcript makes clear, this is plainly false, meaning that Gabbard lied to Congress and committed perjury. [Pols emphasis] She must resign immediately.

Like we said yesterday, Trump assembled a Cabinet of officials based on their personal loyalty to himself, not their competency for the top-level national security positions they’ve been given. This bumbling ineptitude is the fully expected result of hiring cronies instead of professionals, and this incident validates a suspicion that everyone has held about these nominees from the beginning but no Republican had the courage to voice during their confirmations.

Trump’s Cabinet is as incompetent as you thought, and now some of them appear to have perjured themselves covering up their incompetence.

Even in Trump’s brave new MAGA world, there must be limits.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Like It Or Not, “Signalgate” Explodes Into Major Political Crisis For Trump

  1. “Maliciously incompetent” describes Trump and his choice of subordinates.  

    It’s a 🤦🤦‍♂️🤦🏽 week for Trump’s 🤡🤡🤡 national security team

    Texting war plans to a journalist was an astonishing security breach. The emojis were bad, too.

    But beyond the intelligence lapse that led the Trump aides to provide the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg with the targets, weapons and timing of forthcoming military strikes in Yemen, the contents of the Signal chat make it plain for the world to see what our allies feared and our foes hoped: The United States is being run by a bunch of clownish amateurs.

    They misspelled the word “principals.” They attacked Europeans as “free-loading” and “PATHETIC.” They made clear the top message they wanted to come out of the military attack was that “Biden failed.” The highest-ranking national security officials gave evident deference to the deputy White House chief of staff, Stephen Miller.

    1. I agree with you on 99% of what you’re upset about. But I think on two points, not something to ding them on:

      1. Is there anyone here who has never misspelled a word while writing a message on their phone? It happens.
      2. Every president has someone who can shut down a discussion. Regardless of his title at any given time, if Harry Hopkins said “this is what FDR wants,” that was the end of the discussion.

      On the rest – agree with you.

      1. I was quoting Dana Milbank above.  I agree that “principles” vs. “principals” was a weak start to the paragraph, but I included it for continuity.

        As for Stephen Miller — some day, there may need to be another tribunal on the order of the Nuremberg Trials to bring members of the Trump administration to justice. If we still have a democracy, of course.

  2. The initial exchange is inexcusable.

    The efforts to deny, to blame the messenger, to lie about the content of the exchange make it clear the "covreup" is probably worse than the initial offense.

    The implications being spun out are, if anything, even worse…

    • despite specific warnings not to use Signal from people in their organizations, they used it and NO ONE objected.
    • there have been other strings/chats on Signal, 
    • at least some of those involved appear to have been using personal mobile phones, not their government phones
    • there was no "official" record being maintained, as required by several laws or policies on government communication
    • relevant military chain of command AND the Joint Chiefs were NOT a part of the group
    • actions were taken WITHOUT clear command from *resident Trump. Stephen Miller, who has NO official role in international relations ("serving as the 12th United States homeland security advisor and White House deputy chief of staff for policy since 2025"), apparently was the source clarifying what the *resident said. 
  3. Really, nothing at all to see here, folks.

    Just our ruthlessly efficient, bigly, beautiful DEI* administration doing their very bestest at Making Amerihahaha Great Again!!

    (* Dumb, evil, and incompetent)

    Hell, if I were Chuck Schumer I’d have voted to expand this president’s executive powers, too!?!?!?

  4. Rep. Jason Crow gets some notice at Daily Kos:

    ‘Outrageous’: Watch this congressman shred Trump team for war plans leak

    Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado tore into the Trump administration during a House Intelligence Committee Wednesday, as more details emerged regarding the dangerous leaked war plans scandal. 

    “I spent my life in service to this country. I deployed three times to combat in service to this nation. I learned in that time in service that responsibility is core to leadership. You accept responsibility when things go wrong. You admit mistakes. You set the standard from the very top,” he said.

    Unfortunately, the standard for the Trump Mad!-ministration IS being set from the very top.

  5. This will almost get settled in 3 years. When it comes to Trump, and his minions, justice involving confidential information doesn't happen. They will claim, as they did with the documents in Maralago, that there is no confidential information but to prosecute the charge we'll have to prove the confidentiality in public court which we can't do if the info is confidential, right?! Then, in 3 years, Hegseth will announce his candidacy for US President and charges will be dropped because we can't influence an election.

    It's amazing how justice is slow and methodical when it comes to Trump and those who favor Trump while it is swift and brutal when it comes ot the rest of us.

    This is bullshit.

  6. Putin is beyond pleased with his best asset and most useful idiot inhabiting the White House.

    If you’re running the security directorate of a hostile nation, savor this moment. It’s never been easier to steal secrets from the United States government. Can you even call it stealing when it’s this simple? The Trump administration has unlocked the vault doors, fired half of the security guards and asked the rest to roll pennies. Walk right in. Take what you want. This is the golden age.

    In its first two months, the Trump administration has made move after move that exposes the government to penetration by foreign intelligence services. It’s not just the group chat about forthcoming military strikes that The Atlantic revealed on Monday — although that was, to be clear, as audacious and ridiculous a security breach as there has been in decades. The administration short-circuited the process for conducting background checks on top officials, turned tens of thousands of people with access to government secrets into disgruntled ex-employees and announced it was lowering its guard against covert foreign influence operations. It installed one of Elon Musk’s satellite internet terminals on the roof of the White House, seemingly to bypass security controls, and gave access to some of the government’s more sensitive systems to a teenager with a history of aiding a cybercrime ring, who goes by the nickname Big Balls.

    Major adversaries pray for this level of chaos, confusion and opportunity. A secretive Chinese network is trying to recruit fired U.S. government workers. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service states with “high confidence” that foreign adversaries are trying to “capitalize” on the Trump administration’s mass layoffs. But the Chinese Ministry of State Security or the Russian Main Intelligence Directorate aren’t the only ones who stand to profit from the Trump administration’s disregard for even minimal operational security. Intelligence gathering has become easier for everyone.

    So if you’re running a foreign intelligence service, relax. You’ve got time. This fiasco could’ve been a wake-up call to the Trump team, an opportunity to overhaul their security procedures and maybe stop courting disaster on quite so many fronts. This administration has decided to go hard in the other direction. “Nobody’s texting war plans,” Mr. Hesgeth told reporters, after being exposed for doing just that. “I know exactly what I’m doing.”

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

241 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols