The Colorado Libertarian Party has a long way to go in order to achieve any real political relevance in our state. About 37,000 Coloradans are registered as “Libertarians,” which accounts for about 0.009 percent of the state’s 4.1 million active voters.
The recent actions of the CLP’s leadership probably won’t move those numbers any higher.
As Seth Klamann reports for The Denver Post:
The head of the Libertarian Party of Colorado repeatedly used anti-gay slurs last week in an exchange with a person who criticized the party’s social media presence, according to copies of the messages reviewed by The Denver Post.
The party’s chairwoman, Hannah Goodman, sent the slurs Friday after a commenter privately messaged the party’s Facebook account to criticize what he saw as its “asinine” postings. After an initial exchange that included the commenter sarcastically highlighting the party’s lack of electoral success, Goodman — replying through the party’s official account — defended her party’s achievements and repeatedly referred to the commenter using an anti-gay slur.
She also repeatedly referred to him using a slur for people with intellectual disabilities.
Goodman continued using the slurs after the commenter said he planned to take the messages to the media. The party confirmed in a statement Saturday that Goodman, a congressional candidate last year, sent the messages. In a subsequent email exchange in which the commenter asked party leadership for an apology, Goodman told the commenter that she had authored the messages through the party’s Facebook account.
Believe it or not, things actually got worse from here — after CLP Chairperson Hannah Goodman erroneously claimed “there is no such thing as bad press.” This, friends, is very “bad press.”
The CLP brain trust tried to spin this story in a different direction…which just ended up coming back around again to bite them in the ass:
Goodman did not return a message seeking comment Friday. On Saturday, the party’s executive director, James Wiley, sent The Post a seven-page statement that defended the party’s political relevance, touted the success of a recent social media posting on the party’s Facebook page, and further criticized the commenter.
Wiley referred to a meme produced by Goodman as an “artistic work product” that, Wiley wrote, had prompted the initial criticism from the commenter.
As any good public relations professional will (not) tell you, the best way to respond to an ugly situation created by your own leader is to issue a seven-page statement claiming that any offensive comments were merely an “artistic work product.” But if you do go this route in your attempt to clean up a messy situation, definitely don’t conclude with this:
Wiley confirmed that Goodman wrote the messages and said he stood by them. He concluded the statement by calling the commenter another slur and quoting a character from the animated show “South Park.”
Gah!
Welp, at least the Post reporter spelled everyone’s names correctly!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: scarter
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s A Weekend Town Hall-Palooza Featuring Absent Gabe Evans
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Jeff Hurd Won’t Hold a Town Hall Meeting for…Reasons
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Uber Bullies Lawmakers To Protect Bad Drivers
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
These lowlife libertarians deserve each other. Sheesh.
Gotta admit, I hadn't thought of political success by measurements of
So, I'm wondering about the markers of success in social media … I looked at about 50 and the largest number of "likes" seen was 99.
I've been known to put a picture of my dog up on Facebook, NOT link it to an organization, and get 50 likes.
Your dogs are much cuter and more useful to society than the Libertarians.
The recent revelations about Colorado Libertarian Party Chair Hannah Goodman’s use of anti-gay and ableist slurs are deeply disturbing and indefensible. As someone who has long identified with libertarian principles—individual liberty, personal responsibility, and respect for others—I must speak out.
There is no place in a movement rooted in freedom for this kind of cruelty. Libertarianism champions the rights and dignity of all people, regardless of sexual orientation or identity. For the leadership of the Colorado LP to not only tolerate but defend such behavior is a betrayal of those ideals.
Goodman’s comments do not reflect the values of many Libertarians—past or present—who have stood firmly against state oppression and bigotry in all forms. From opposing the military draft to advocating for marriage equality long before it was politically popular, libertarians have often led the charge for civil liberties. That legacy is being eroded by a leadership more interested in online “shock value” than serious discourse.
Those of us who believe in liberty must demand better. We cannot allow our parties or principles to be hijacked by those who see cruelty as a substitute for conviction. Hannah Goodman should resign, and the Colorado LP must reflect deeply on how it moves forward.