U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 11, 2007 04:55 AM UTC

Most important bill so far

  • 7 Comments
  • by: cdsmith

According to Ritter’s press releases, every single bill he’s signed this year has been “landmark” legislation or an “important day” in Colorado history.  Since not everyday can be truly historic, I’m asking here.

What is the most important bill that has passed so far this legislative session by our state legislature?

Comments

7 thoughts on “Most important bill so far

  1. For those interested, the bills signed so far are:

    HB07-1005 – Alert Program For Missing Persons with Disabilities
    HB07-1010 – Electronic Transfers In Warrant Process
    HB07-1034 – Allowing A Law Student To Represent Clients
    HB07-1045 – Max Number of Persons On County Planning Committee
    HB07-1046 – Elimination of Outdated Laws Related to Dept. Of Revenue
    HB07-1048 – Concerning Longitudinal Analysis Of Student Assessments.
    HB07-1051 – Concerning The Notice Sent By A County Treasurer To A Taxpayer For Unpaid Property Taxes.
    HB07-1053 – Enactment of CO Revised Statutes
    HB07-1147 – Concerning The Confidentiality Of Witness Protection Materials
    HB07-1314 – Extend Rules For Public Benefits
    HJR07-1005 – Approval of Water Project Act
    SB07-001 – Concerning Generic Prescription Drugs
    SB07-026 – Authorization Of School Dist. Revenues to Fund Kindergarten Programs

    My vote would go to SB 001. There will be better ones coming though.

    1. I’ll go along with your choice Car 31 and will be interested to see if it has the desired effect. 

      Do you know what the Water Project Act is and why do we want law students representing clients?

      1. Each and every one of ’em…

        Water Project Act = a joint resolutoin adding a bunch of water managment projects to the Drinking Water Project Eligibility List as defined in sections 37-95-103(4.8) and 31-37-95-107.8(4)(c). This is a historical piece of legislation that Ritter signed gleefully.

        Law students can only represent clients if they are associated with a law school with a legal aid dispensary.  The students give legal advice and can represent clients whom otherwise could not afford representation.  They can only represent the clients in front of an arbitration panel, not a criminal case. So if a landlord was unjustly kicking a family out, they could get help.  Truly, this landmark legislation will allow underserved people throughout Colorado better access to legal resources so they too can sue people!

        1. Pushed through by trial lawyers? Don’t mind the freebie advice for low income people but my fear would be getting weak advice from inexperienced newbies, but I guess it is better than no advice.  (maybe)

          I’ve been wondering when more water projects would begin.  It seems to be taking forever.  We need to catch and keep more of it!

          1. But my guess is that 3Ls are the ones who would be doling out the advice. And I would also guess that they would be supervised by profs.

            This is actually pretty common at law schools to give students practical experience.

  2. “PUEBLO – Gov. Bill Ritter signed a landmark bill in Pueblo this morning to protect Colorado water quality. House Bill 1132 will, for the first time, allow water court judges to consider environmental impacts and water quality along with water quantity as part of the determination on large permanent transfers.”

    Evan Dreyer needs to come up with some new adjectives.

    1. there’s never been water quality bills ever passed before. 

      Who tests the water, who decides if the water quality is acceptable, what happens when water is needed but some controlling entity won’t allow the transfer due to environmental concerns, and who pays for all this testing and evaluation?  Just wondering out loud…..

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

109 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!