Republican Secretary of State Mike Coffman has responded to recent posts at Colorado Pols regarding his involvement in Haditha, Iraq. Click below for the complete statement received by email…
In response to recent posts by ColoradoPols, I have drafted the following statement to set the record straight:
My final assignment in Iraq was in the Western Euphrates River Valley just below the Haditha dam. I was a U.S. Marine Corps Civil Affairs Officer assigned to help develop interim local governments in the towns of Haditha, Haqlaniyah and Barwana. The area was known to have had strong ties to the insurgency and for giving safe harbor to the foreign fighters who were crossing into Iraq from the Syrian border.
The incident in Haditha where 24 civilians were killed by Marines following an IED attack occurred in November 2005. I did not arrive in Haditha until January 2006. There was no mention of the November 2005 incident at my first meeting with the Haditha City Council in early January 2006 and Lt. Col. Chessani was not present at the meeting.
At this meeting, the members of the City Council were angry about a complete ban on all civilian vehicle traffic that was ordered immediately following the deaths of two Marines who were killed by a suicide car bomb. They were already upset that their bridges across the Euphrates River had been destroyed during a major offensive operation in October 2005 and the newly imposed ban on all civilian vehicle traffic just added to it. Agriculture was an important part of the local economy and they needed the bridges as well as their trucks to transport their fruits and vegetables to market.
My second meeting with the Haditha City Council was in late January and Lt. Col. Chessani was present. I did not take Lt. Col. Chessani to the meeting, as was reported in the media; the reporter embellished that point. The officer in charge of the Civil Military Operations Center (my reporting senior) called the meeting. At this meeting, Lt. Col. Chessani presented his goals for the area to the members of the Haditha City Council and to local tribal leaders who were in attendance. I did not participate in the meeting but did observe it and write a report that was forwarded up my chain of command. There was no discussion of the November 2005 incident during the meeting.
After the meeting, it was clear to me that the governance situation in Haditha, given the recent establishment of a Civil Military Operations Center, was more advanced than the other two towns in the river valley that were in our area of responsibility. I then requested and was granted permission to focus on the smaller towns of Haqlaniyah and Barwana for the remainder of my assignment.
Before I left Haditha to start working on the other two towns, I asked the Civil Affairs Team Leader, assigned to the town, about the overall civil military situation in his area. During that discussion, he said that he was on the scene following the November 2005 incident to arrange compensation to the families who suffered losses. In his opinion, there was an overreaction by the Marines but he never indicated nor inferred that it rose to the level of criminal misconduct (i.e. violated the Rules of Engagement). I met with him again in March 2006 just before I completed my assignment and asked for an update on the general civil military situation in Haditha. In that conversation, he informed me that the November 2005 incident was under investigation.
I returned to Colorado in late March 2006 from Iraq and in late May 2006, I saw stories in the media about the November 2005 incident in Haditha. The media stories referenced a press release, issued by the U.S. Marine Corps that the civilian casualties from the November 2005 incident were caused by the same IED that was used by the insurgents against the Marine convoy. Because I was previously informed by the Civil Affairs Team Leader assigned to Haditha, that the civilian casualties occurred subsequent to the IED attack, I felt it necessary to notify the U.S. Marine Corps of the discrepancy. I gave a sworn statement to that effect in June 2006. I have not been requested to testify at the trial.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Air Slash
IN: Battle for GOP Chair, Sans Dave Williams, Gets Underway
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Air Slash
IN: Battle for GOP Chair, Sans Dave Williams, Gets Underway
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Gun Rights Groups Losing Their Damn Minds Over New Magazine Limit Bill
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Battle for GOP Chair, Sans Dave Williams, Gets Underway
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Gun Rights Groups Losing Their Damn Minds Over New Magazine Limit Bill
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Thorntonite
IN: Gun Rights Groups Losing Their Damn Minds Over New Magazine Limit Bill
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
the specific allegation that town elders did complain about the Haditha incident involving the killing of civilians at a meeting at which Coffman was present and that he therefore was not being truthful when he claimed to have heard no such complaints. This release doesn’t really clear that up.
You may not like his answers or you may not believe them (good points below). But he did answer them.
It makes no sense that the Haditha city government would protest and demand an investigation of the massacre right after it happened, but then “forget” to mention the issue only two months later when they convened for “the first time in many months.” Coffman says there were two meetings in January when the press only reported one–he says Chessani, commander of the troops accused of the massacre was at the second one only–and the city government failed to mention the massacre to him at either one? He’s the senior civil affairs officer on the scene, right?
That’s impossible. They would have mentioned it. Remember, nobody knew that the Haditha city government had gotten involved AT ALL until last weekend, when the Washington Post reported it and Pols diligently linked to it. That fact calls Coffman’s story into question along with the other Marine officers with direct involvement in the massacre’s aftermath–did he help suppress an investigation right along with them?
Even if he gave a belated statement about something the Marine Corps and the public already knew (the civilians did not die in an IED attack), after the scandal over the massacre and coverup was already underway, and while he was running for Secretary of State here in Colorado, I don’t see how that exonerates him. The reverse, actually.
I think–it took a while to digest this, and it doesn’t match up exactly with that of the news story.
It’s just not credible that a horrific incident like that–which obviously still burns in that community–would not have come to Coffman’s attention at the January forum, or in other dramatic ways.
Coffman was doing his job as a Republican–go to Iraq, milk the positive press, then come back and report that it’s all sunshine. But it still smells to me like he’s done more than just gloss over details.
(Also, Mr. Coffman, you wanted the verb “imply,” not “infer” in the next-to-last paragraph.)
Real local issues are:
1.) Why are Lloyds of London, Mutual Insurance of Bermuda and TIG Insurance of Canada doing business in CO even though they are not registered with CO insurance commission?
2.) Why aren’t these foreign insurance companies paying income taxes to the state of CO?
3.) Why did David Brougham bill Lloyds of London for discussion of case assignment issues before my 02-1950 case was transferred from Judge Masch to Judge Nottingham without the first judge claiming to be sick or a conflict of interest? Is Lloyds so powerful that it affects which judge is assigned to cases that they might have to pay on?
4.) Why isn’t CIRSA, Colorado Intergovernmental Risksharing Agency, listed as a government, government agency, corporation, partnership, limited partnership, or charity? Why don’t they pay income taxes in CO (their director Tim Greer claimed at some point they are required to use government accounting systems but I don’t know who said so). Why was their audit signed KPMG without a persons name being listed as is standard practice?
Your odd questions have a better home than this thread, which is about Mike Coffman’s knowledge of the Haditha massacre.
The questions raised above are all questions that should be answered by the Secretary of State. If diverges from the thread topic in that it doesn;t really relate to Haditha.
He probably won’t read an”open thread”. He probably will read about himself.
aplogies if it had been posted before
Coffman offended at CoPols
http://www.rockymoun…