U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 12, 2007 05:37 PM UTC

Allard's Vapid Insights Into Immigration Bill's Failure

  • 20 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

A week after unsuccessfully trying to kill one of the key provisions in the immigration “Grand Compromise” now stalled on Capitol Hill, Colorado’s outgoing Senator Wayne Allard offered these non-statements to the Grand Junction Sentinel:

Less than a week after an immigration reform package fell apart in the U.S. Senate, Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., said Monday the president and the bill’s backers would have succeeded had they limited their immediate goals.

Without second-guessing the strategy for a comprehensive-reform measure that failed to weather key votes Wednesday and Thursday, Allard said Americans want to see the nation’s borders secured…

Several aspects of the measure garnered more than 60-vote majorities in the Senate, but the entire measure could not garner enough support to overcome a filibuster, suggesting that senators’ constituencies want some immigration reform but were displeased by the overall package.

If backers can overcome a few misgivings, “I think the bill will pass,” said Allard, who declined to take a stand on the measure…

Though backers like Sen. Ken Salazar are vowing to try again, most agree that comprehensive immigration reform is dead now until after the 2008 elections–except for heavy usage in campaign speeches, which as Tom Tancredo will tell you is the place it truly belongs.

Allard, always a man who knew when to take an issue with wedge potential and idly gum it into another term in office, seems happy to help.

Comments

20 thoughts on “Allard’s Vapid Insights Into Immigration Bill’s Failure

  1. There were way too many deal-killers in it, and it didn’t address the concerns real people have about it.  The people didn’t have much of a say, but the lobbyists who bought the pols and the Hispanic lobby (which both parties are clearly pandering to) had way too much input.

    This is a discussion we should have in 2008, on account of its wide-ranging ramifications.  Didn’t a certain pol on this blog recently counsel that we shouldn’t rush legislation to market? 

  2. a bad name.

    We just don’t deserve someone this stupid. Thank whatever deity you choose that he’s out in less than a year and a half.

    1. We deserve Allard just like we deserve Bush: Too many stupid voters sucked by fear of lawyer-lobbyists and tare-ists. The mere fact that so many people voted for Bush and now don’t support him implies some sort of nose ring is inserted in many voters at birth. 

        1. the only major Stricklands in Colorado are Repubs. Could be wrong but I seem to recall my dad going off on Ted Strickland many moons ago…

            1. I think Ted Strickland was/is Bill Armstrong’s son in law, or some such thing. I believe he had the privilege of losing a Senate contest to Tim Wirth.

              One Queer Dude, as the Pols repository of all Colorado political history going back to the 70s, can you confirm this?

              1.   I would think it unlikely. Isn’t Ted Strickland, while not quite the same age as Bill Armstrong, fairly close to Armstrong’s age?  So it’s unlikely they would have a father-in-law/son-in-law relationship.
                  Ted Strickland did not run against Tim Wirth.  Ken Kramer ran against Tim Wirth in a classic Boulder liberal Democrat vs. Colo. Spgs. conservative Republican batle royale in 1986.  Mark Udall can take some comfort in how that epic struggle between right and left turned out.  (And Colo. was a lot moe red back then than it is today.)
                  Ted Strickland was the GOP nominee for Guv in ’86, losing to Roy Romer.

          1. was NOT created by Dick Wadhams.  It was first used by Strickland’s Democratic primary opponent in 1996, Gene Nichol.

            Wadhams has always gotten/taken credit for that but he just appropriated it.  Just as Both Ways Bob was first used by his primary opponent and it stuck.

    2. I mean, you fire your press guy who sends out an offensive press release with your name attached to a quote disparaging firefighters and police officers. And then, to make it worse, the mistake gets picked up by local media and national blogs.

      http://journals.demo

      We’re talking no-brainer, right? Can he get that right – FOR STARTERS?

      If he hasn’t fired that bozo yet, then I am afraid we have our answer. He really is that stupid.

  3. Got Allard’s email update today and feel compelled to point out what was surely a staffer’s omission rather than some overt wrongness on Allard’s behalf, but still… Take a look at this:

    I am very proud of the participants at this year’s Allard Capital Conference.  They provoked thoughtful discussions with every one of our speaker ranging from issues on immigration to education, health care and the war in –insert country here–.

    OK, so I added –insert country here– where the blank was, but really… They had a hard time spelling Iraq? Couldn’t decide whether to say Iraq or Iran?

    Can’t wait until this oaf’s out of office.

    1. than you do because it’s straight out of 1984 – Allard’s prepared for war all the time, ready for when we make peace with one country in order to take up arms against someone else.

      Don’t forget Afghanistan…

      1. and didn’t the Taliban actually aid and abet al Queda in carrying out the 9/11 attacks?  Meanwhile, the hunt for WMDs continues in Iraq…..

    2. that sent out the fucked up press release about first response  teams? Remember that? It was absolutely insulting and it got sent out by accident, probably by the same dimwit that shot this one out.

  4. If immigration reform is dead until 2009, will Tancredo now have an excuse to abandon his pathetic presidential campaign and seek yet another do-nothing, know-nothing, say-anything term as Congressman for my poor, underrepresented 6th Congressional District?

    I hope he keeps campaigning for the presidency. He promised before that he’d decide in June whether he’d seek re-election to Congress, but he can’t be trusted to keep his word.

    1. Since when have you ever seen a politician keep his or her word?  That’s what makes Schaffer stand out; he is the last one to do so that I can actually recall….

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

82 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!