FOX 31's Eli Stokols reports, while any Democrat with a sense of self-preservation cringes:
“It’s why we have call boxes, it’s why we have safe zones, it’s why we have the whistles,” [Rep. Joe] Salazar said on the House floor. “Because you just don’t know who you’re gonna be shooting at. And you don’t know if you feel like you’re gonna be raped, or if you feel like someone’s been following you around or if you feel like you’re in trouble when you may actually not be, [Pols emphasis] that you pop out that gun and you pop … pop around at somebody.”
On the floor, House Republican woman were quick to respond.
“I’m sorry, a whistle and a call box are not going to help that woman on campus,” said Rep. Polly Lawrence, R-Littleton, who also took issue with Salazar’s notion “that women don’t know when we’re going to be raped, that [women] can’t recognize when there’s an inherent danger?”
One of them, Rep. Lori Saine, R-Dacono, apologized to Salazar after he returned to the well and denying that he’d implied that women don’t know when they’re being raped…
Although the issue appeared to have been resolved on the House floor Friday evening, by yesterday afternoon, the clip of Rep. Joe Salazar saying "you don’t know if you feel like you’re gonna be raped" was on the front page of conservative blogs around the country–minus, of course, any of the dialogue that came after or Rep. Salazar's clarification. In a twist of irony, the story on the leading conservative blog RedState was penned by none other than St. Louis-based AM radio host Dana Loesch. Loesch, you might remember, was one of the foremost commentators defending Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin after his infamous "legitimate rape" comments.
To be honest, we're not sure what Loesch's motive here is, except maybe to purge her own conscience.
But with that said, GOP hypocrisy doesn't excuse what Rep. Salazar said on the House floor Friday. We would have thought so many previous examples would have imparted the lesson to everybody, but Joe Salazar is a rookie lawmaker, so we're going to be very nice and point this out one more time…
Never, ever, ever, ever go near the toxic subject of uncertainty and rape. Even if that's not "what you mean." Especially if you're a male, and you're not 100% sure that what you are about to say on this subject is inoffensive to women and wholly defensible, for God's sake, don't say it. Democrats may not want to hear it, but the fact is, what Rep. Salazar said can be interpreted in objectively very upsetting ways–and the blowback from Republicans, however hypocritical, was also fully predictable. It doesn't matter, or at best only matters a little, that Salazar, a civil rights attorney, is actually much more thoughtful and empathetic than these remarks make him appear. Like it or not, he most likely has more apologies in his immediate future.
The debate over gun safety legislation in the Colorado General Assembly has elevated the body's prominence. With that heightened prominence comes heightened responsibility–to do, and say, the right things. The eagerness of the national conservative megaphone to attack Rep. Salazar, regardless of the hypocrisy of doing so or public opinion on the underlying issue, should be a warning to Democrats to think, and think again, before they speak.
Because context won't ever be in the sound bite, and hypocrisy can be concealed by turning up the volume.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
He said a stupid thing, clearly not as stupid as Akin or Murdoch, but stupid nonetheless. Why couldn't he have suggested say, pepper spray. I know the whistle may hurt someones ears for a second and draw some attention (if someone is nearby) but if there is a true threat spray the bastard in the face with pepper spray, kick him in the junk, and run.
That seems like a much smarter "suggestion" a man could make to a women rather than "find a blue help box and blow your whistle" IMO anyway.
This gun debate situation is similar to the Aurora theater or the bar in Denver across from ShotGun Willies — the first being a gun free zone, the other a bar who's gun status I don't know. Nedless to say a whistle, nor a call box, etc… were effective in stopping the mass murder that occured at both locations.
As to Joe "potential ass rape victim" Salazar, good Democrats and others in his district should strongly consider a recall.
He stepped in it, to be sure. But this was so unlike any of the pro-rape apologisms from the GOrP that their seizure upon it is simply one more case of Republican desire to get even, try to show that "they do it too," even though they (the Democrats) did nothing of the sort. (How many of last fall rape apologists ever issued any kind of retraction, let alone one as fast as Salazar's?)
Well, it's a lesson in 21st century politics. I couldn't agree more with Pols' concluding paragraphs.
it is rather like those who see a "poll tax" in a customer paid background check. I say they are the same so you have to tell me why they are not
"He stepped in it"?
No, more like he squatted down grunted and shit on the sidewalk. Then as he turned away silently to depart the scene he stepped in it.
Libby, I know that that's what you do with every single post of yours on Pols, but that doesn't mean everyone else is doing it, too. Don't delude yourself into thinking that your propensity for public shitting is something you have in common with anyone.
Agree with all the comments so far. I think he was just trying to say that sometimes you may think you're in danger when you're not. People have, after all, accidentally shot family members thinking they were intruders. It wasn't the best way to put it but not in the same universe as Akins comment to the effect that if it's real rape a magic spermicidal intervention will manifest itself, but only if the victim isn't enjoying it, in which case it's not rape and there will be no complimentary pregnancy protection.
Very sound advice for a politician.
It's getting really gross on Twitter. The righties have invented a new hashtag #LiberalTips2AvoidRape. It's trending nationally, but it's becoming so bad it's starting to backfire.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/02/liberaltips2avoidrape-most-horrible-hashtag-week-explained-joe-salazar-colorado-rape-guns?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Motherjones%2Fmojoblog+%28MotherJones.com+%7C+MoJoBlog%29
One part acknowledgement, three parts defensive spin. Your acknowledgement buried the perfect number of paragraphs to be defensible. It's so slick I almost don't ask the question, "why weren't you as nice to Todd Akin?"
You guys are pros though. I admire your handiwork.
ROFLMAO…. I see you mentioned Akin, the guy you defended without even once, not even passive aggressively, acknowledging that he was at fault in any way. Now you think you can criticize? You're casting stones while stained with the same sin, ArapaGOrP.
Read more! It's national news.
So, how does the fact it's national news support the "liberal media" myth?
The governments really directing women on their property to "piss themselves"?
#GovtTips2AvoidRape says "piss yourself", will #LiberalTips2AvoidRape follow?
Read more!
Politico: read more!
Herman Cain. He of the "pushed my head into his lap" job reference? That Herman Cain?
So, that was Herman Cain. Any other loser GOP candidates pipe up? How about Hannity? Glen Beck?
This may be a case on my part of attacking the messenger, but who gives a shit what Herman Cain thinks?
What he said was wrong. Not just poorly phrased but wrong. Part of what he said was valid – don't start firing a gun if you are uneasy. But the way he put it is at a minimum very insensitive. And I can see how others, not just partisian Republicans, can take it as worse.
Wow, ArapG is so-o-o–o excited. Can't wait for replies before posting again and again. Hope he doesn't sprain something. And I just don't want to be there when the realization sets in that, no, this isn't going to ever assume the dimensions of the Akin remarks. And not because of librul bias. Just because it isn't in the same league and everybody knows it. Probably even poor ArapG, our very own failed troll. We should make him the ColPols mascot or something. Being a goofy little troll ought to be good for something.
As a formerly affiliated Republican I have to say that ArapGOP's posting of absolute nonsense is what is wrong with the party now. If "controlling the message" is more than half the battle, ArapGOP is losing the battle for them. (Ok, I know there are a million more problems with the GOP other than message control but when you have people giving themselves carpel-tunnel-by-cut-and-paste.. you get the point).
Was it Jeff Foxworthy or one of those Blue Collar Comedy guys with the "you cant fix stupid" routine?!
true enough, but you have indeed, I believe, touched upon a very important point.They really do believe it all boils down to that…message control.
Let's hope they are wrong, though, Mr. Huxley, I believe, foresaw a world in which they win…we cannot let that happen.
so…I guess I should follow up on that by saying..it has long been a political practice to craft messages and distribute them. Control of the message is indeed critical, but when you believe the message doesn't have to be based on rational, imperical, or logical assumptions, it simply has to sound good…when you believe it doesn't have to mean anything or be true…you will say pretty much anything, no matter how far-fetched (talking to you, Governor) or duplicitous it may be.
The arrogant part is the part where they think a majority of Americans can be persuaded to EVER give them another chance to run the country into the ground again…simply by their ability to frame a lie as the truth.
ArapaGOP is really on my payroll as a lefty liberal. No one is really as ineffective as he, his sole purpose is to make GOP trolls look utterly ridiculous. Good job, A-Bot, I think I'll bump you up to $.04 a word.
Finally an explanation for ArapG that makes sense. Very sly, Twitty.
What’s this? Spell check? Every day is an adventure on the new site, isn’t it?
EXCEPT rape on the CU campus has been a problem for decades……I remember long ago when women were told that if they were attacked, that they would be held responsible because the attack was evidence that they were someplace they should not be….I remember far more recently, when there were a series of attacks on campus, women were issued whistles and maps…showing the location of the nearest phone. CRAP. The problem is that coeds are not safe on the CU campus because its interior is not well lighted or well patroled. The answer is, of course, to have more police walking, armed with guns, dogs, pepper spray, phones, big lights, 24/7.
If I had a daughter or granddaughter going to CU and she wanted to be armed, I don't know what my response would be. But it pisses me off that Salazar revealed, however unartfully, his prejudice about coeds and his ignorance of a very real problem.