President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 28, 2013 08:36 AM UTC

Guns: Probably Not The Next "Obamacare"

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Durango Herald's Joe Hanel takes a peek behind the curtain at the "grassroots uprising" against proposed gun safety legislation in Colorado. No surprises, but an important piece of this story to firmly establish in the record:

Experienced Republican campaigners have entered the fight against Rep. Mike McLachlan, D-Durango, although it remains to be seen how much they will assist in an effort to recall him.

A new nonprofit group called Colorado Citizens Protecting Our Constitution took out Web ads and a full-page print ad in the Feb. 17 Durango Herald to criticize McLachlan’s votes on four gun bills…

But little is known about the group or its funding. As a 501(c)4 nonprofit, the group does not have to reveal its donors.

It was registered Feb. 13, five days before McLachlan’s votes on the gun bills.

Tim Pollard placed the ads for the group. He is chief operating officer for EIS Solutions, a Grand Junction political-advocacy business that often works for the natural-gas and oil industry. Josh Penry, a former Senate minority leader and Republican candidate for governor, is EIS’s most well-known employee.

Early effort by some of our state's best-known Republican political operatives to set up the debate over guns in the Colorado legislature as a 2014 campaign issue is, like we said, totally predictable. It's a sign, as if the angry pro-gun mobs crashing legislative town hall meetings a la "Obamacare" August 2009 last weekend weren't sufficient proof–and yes, the crazies taking the unhinged low information talk-radio faux outrage to an ugly level–that Republicans intend to use the issue to turn out conservative voters next year.

The problem is, blustery nonsense aside, the gun lobby is on the wrong side of public opinion. Despite the intensity this issue provokes among one segment of voters, the fact is that polls consistently show support–as they did not with "Obamacare"–for the legislation actually being proposed at the Colorado Capitol. A new Wall Street Journal poll yesterday shows that 61% of the public supports stricter laws on gun sales. Only 34% said existing laws governing the sale of guns were good enough, and just a tiny 4% agree with local gun right activists like Rocky Mountain Gun Owners that these laws should actually be made weaker.

Needless to say, these are numbers that health care reform proponents would have begged for in 2009.

So what does this mean? Well, usual suspects like EIS Solutions, unless they've got a contract from the gun industry (which can't be ruled out), are mercenaries primarily interested in exploiting issues for Republican electoral gain. The increasingly well-funded campaign against the gun safety bills at the Capitol is a clear sign that Republicans think this issue will work for them electorally in 2014. It's what they've got to work with right now.

But once Dudley Brown stops bloviating and sober analysis begins, it doesn't actually look like it will.

Tweet
Share

Comments

14 thoughts on “Guns: Probably Not The Next “Obamacare””

    1. Yup. Remember how they said Obamacare would kill Grandma? That's the kind of lying going on with guns today.

      It is very reassuring to see the American people aren't fooled by the gun nuts anymore.

        1. The huge crowds turning out to oppose Democrat gun control: do you think they are all stupid? When they testify, they are not being coached. I wouldn't be sure confident in the polls if I were you. This issue will cost Democrats dearly in 2014. Pols is engaging in panicked wishful thinking as usual.

          1. Got any crowd counts and photographs to support them? Got any polls to show widespread opposition to sensible measures like universal background checks? You know, the ones supported by most gun owners?

            I won't hold my breath because I know you don't have any of that.

            2. Ari, I got on google and put in "day of resistance 2/23  youtube.

              You'll make your own determination, but from the footage shot by the gunsters themselves, it looked and sounded like /denver had 75-125.

                1. No, it doesn't.

                  I remember a while back, opening day of the Legislature, 1/9, a loon by the name of pashman organized a gun nut meetup like this. Capitol Steps  I think Duke was downtown for an anti fracking rally,and I drove by, admittedly after the fact. I saw a few people. The gun nuts were across the street.

                  If memory serves, Duke said maybe 500 gun goons.

                  What stands out about that one was pashman ran his mouth all week before the rally about how the pro 2nd protesters "would be open carrying, just to show the legislators we mean business". (Paraphrasing).

                  Well, that didn't happen. And pashman curled up in the fetal, just like nugent with the Secret Service, when confronted by a reporter from the Post.. Different tune than the week before, the DPD was there, and it made a difference. Google"neal pashman 9news."

                   Any how, I figure this one had less than that one, and that's good for civilization.

          2. Not coached?

            Re: 2-27 Town Hall in Louisville

            "Crash" is the correct term. 

            There was a takeover attempted in the first 30 seconds of the meeting:http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_20/518183_.html 
            "So, when you take over the meeting, don't just talk about our rights. That IS the point to us but most citizens – sadly – know about as much about the Bill of Rights as they do about their car's electrical system"

          1. Bullshit. Since your return from your asskicking you've been a major troll. Almost as bad as basement warrior.

            Hey, can you tell me how gun purchasers paying for their own background checks is a bad thing?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

151 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!