U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 05, 2013 04:41 PM UTC
16 Comments
Wow, from eruption after the dudster spoke, sure sounds like the gooneys packed it with gooneys on entitlements. Work day and all that.
So they're allready on disability, or SS, or both, and now they want me to pay for their fucking background checks too?
Goddam mooches, those gooneys are.
Just a thought, what does a gooney do, who does the gooney root for, when ryan/paul pass another Bill in the redleg house that pulls their entitlements? Would the god fearin', half the country lovin', pinko , 2nd amendment bastardizen' snipes actually pray President Obama (you know, the "Muslim guy") saves their asses again?
Elliot, yer up.
Ole Jesse walked himself right into that one. Christ Almightly, even Sen. Guzman was concerned along with Sen. King that Jesse there was headed for a rude awakening.
WTF?
Make sense.
Jesse walked right into that exchange. Both Guzman and King tried to protect him. Jesse allowed a citizen to help him make an ass out of himself.
Walked into what?
The goonies stacked the meeting, and they cheered when brown threatened him.
That's not "making a fool out himself" He's just doing his job, you fuck.
Making a fool out of yourself is you thinking brown was not out of line and the goobers in the gallery bein'…………..goobers……….is okay.
He can't. He's having an episode. Just look at everything he's posted in the past half hour.
It will be interesting to see if those lobbying rules hold up after Citizen's United. I haven't reviewed this recently, but my recollection is the main outstanding justification for restricting donations is to limit the risk of quid pro quo corruption. Again, without looking at this closley (i.e. NOT legal advice) I don't think that kind of risk is present here – Dudley Brown isn't seeking to get an unseemly contract – he is seeking to advocate for core ideas he believes in. It would be little different than if a lobbyist for Planned Parenthood said they would donate to the primary opponent of any democrat that voted for Personhood.
As I said though (multiple times) I haven't yet looked at this question closely, so feel free to double check the relevant caselaw and correct me if you think this is an inaccurate understanding of the law's current state.
The big question I'd have for Dudley is not whether RMGO is going to be giving money to causes related to gun rights, its instead whether RMGO will be funnelling money to other causes unrelated to guns.
How is this different? Are you implying that PP doesn't "advocate for core ideas they believe in"? Because you're way off base if you are.
I read that as a way of saying no difference. It was "little different", not "a little different."
Whoops. I misread that.
Elliot, my apologies.
No worries
Anyone is allowed to say they'll fund an opposition campaign, but not in the context of lobbying. It's the "support this or else" in the process of lobbying for legislation or other actino that is the kicker.
I don't know all of PP's activities, but my guess is they do just that. Hence why I drew the comparison.
That doesn't make any sense. You said "It would be a little different," not "it's like…."
Also, Elliot, can you PLEASE use the reply link when posting replies?
Speaking of asses. That would be and has been Dudley Brown for more than 20 years. He's been making these threats for years and years. They used to be taken seriously when the Republicans controlled everything and when the party wasn't so homogenous. The fact is that Dudley and his tactics are still left in the early 1990's when there were still enough moderate Republicans to swing things in the Legislature. Not so any more. He's not going to support a Dem no matter how they vote. They know it. His leverage is gone. So now he's just left as the same man with the little penis but now his threats and power are nothing. Goodbye Dudley. Can't say I'm sorry to see you go. Rest in hell.