U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 25, 2013 03:14 PM UTC

Screwing Public Employees, Paying Private Prisons: Long Bill Time!

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Colorado economy continues on a path to recovery, with a larger-than-expected revenue projection of an additional $256 million for FY 2013-2014. But the question remains, as Colorado WINS Executive Director Scott Wasserman asked Eli Stokols of FOX 31 today:

“Can’t we have just one budget year in which public services and those who provide them are not used as a straw man for a partisan agenda?”

Judging by statements made during the recent figure setting for the 2013-2014 budget at the Joint Budget Committee, it appears the answer is "no." Republicans on the JBC say they are prepared to vote against the "Long Bill" General Fund budget–to oppose badly needed raises for state employees, and to protect for-profit prisons over state jobs. As FOX 31 continues, they are determined to plant the flag on this issue even though the fiscal picture is looking much better:

This year Democrats control both the state House and Senate, along with the governor’s mansion, and will be able to pass the budget it wants. In addition, they’ve got a lot more money in the bank, with next year’s general fund anticipated to be roughly $1 billion higher than the current fiscal year’s thanks to an increasingly optimistic revenue forecast. 

With that improved revenue forecast for 2012 and beyond, state employees are counting on a 2 percent across-the-board raise plus additional incentives for high-performing workers.

And as the state’s prison population declines, they are also asking the state to prioritize public facilities and close for-profit prison beds.

With regard to keeping private prison beds open, On March 14, after the discussion of the closure of 318 for-profit prison beds, Rep. Cheri Gerou told the JBC, “I know that I have at least two members of my caucus that will probably vote against the budget just on this basis, because it will directly impact their communities, and I think Sen. Lambert has a colleague in his caucus who will probably vote against the budget based on this.”

And after four years without a raise for all state workers, everyone from corrections officers to staff at state veterans’ homes, both Rep. Gerou and Sen. Kent Lambert stated on March 20 that applying a 2% across the board baseline pay increase would be the thing that makes Republicans vote against the budget. “That may have cost all the votes on my side of the aisle,” Gerou said.

Neither of these stands make Republicans look particularly good.

It's bad enough that seriously overdue raises for these employees are being fought over with revenues improving. But the prioritization of private prisons over state employee-run facilities adds insult to injury–not to mention the political intrigue added by private prison lobbying efforts and campaign contributions. On March 12, the Colorado Springs Gazette, laid out the conservative case why for profit prisons are bad for the economy, saying “not all profit is virtuous. Just as profit motive can provide a surplus of cars, it can provide surpluses we do not want."

Private prisons run on a profit motive that creates a perverse incentive for governments to supply prisoners. …Unlike a private prison owner, governments benefit from declining prison populations.

To a politician, fewer prisoners should be seen as more money for bridges, roads, education and other investments that move society forward.”

One other point worth making here is that many state workers are Republicans too, who live in conservative parts of the state like Sterling, Delta, and Montrose. House and Senate Republicans should be aware of the risk of alienating their own constituents by voting against their communities and scapegoating public employees.

Often it's the case that the annual Long Bill budget battle begins, especially on the GOP side, with staking out an ambitious blustery position, then backtracking into bipartisanship and compromise. Hopefully that will happen again this time, but the hard line being taken by Republicans–and the issues on which they are making their stand–makes it a little harder to envision.

We'll be watching to see how this potentially volatile combination of flashpoints come together.

Tweet
Share

Comments

13 thoughts on “Screwing Public Employees, Paying Private Prisons: Long Bill Time!”

  1. What is it with Democrats killing private sector jobs?

    http://www.cca.com/social-responsibility/adding-value-for-taxpayers/

    Independent research, from a combined 28 studies by leading academics, found that companies like CCA save taxpayers an average of five to 15 percent in costs. CCA creates these savings for our partners in a number of ways:

    • CCA can build a new facility in 12 to 18 months, compared to a public construction timeline of three to six years. 

    • By driving efficiencies in the construction process, CCA builds an average 1,000-bed prison for under $75 million versus a governmental agency's typical expense of more than $150 million. 

    • CCA facilities relieve unsafe overcrowding, which reduces the need to spend capital and issue public bonds to finance new construction. Reducing overcrowded conditions also enables greater efficiencies and enhanced safety in existing public facilities. 

    • We also use our national purchasing power to get better rates when buying needed goods and services, such as prescription drugs. We pass along such savings to our government partners and, by extension, to taxpayers. 

    Cost savings from CCA facilities can be reinvested in additional public safety and rehabilitation programs, but the benefits for taxpayers don’t end there. The presence of a CCA facility leads to additional economic benefits, such as tax revenues and utility payments. For example: 

    • A CCA facility is often the largest employer in the community where it operates, which means hundreds of jobs, with competitive salaries and benefits, and an annual payroll in the millions of dollars. For example, on behalf of one state partner, we recently opened a prison that provides more than 200 jobs, pays an estimated $8 million annually in salaries and benefits, and contributes more than $1 million each year in combined local property taxes and utilities.

    • Additionally, CCA facilities purchase a number of goods and services locally, creating a multiplied effect in the local economy.

    1. Smooth move, posting the company's advertisement blurb on this blog.  You work as their paid publicist too?

      Perhaps the quote from the diary was too subtle for you and it went right over your head.  So let me repost it for you:

      Private prisons run on a profit motive that creates a perverse incentive for governments to supply prisoners. …Unlike a private prison owner, governments benefit from declining prison populations.

      To a politician, fewer prisoners should be seen as more money for bridges, roads, education and other investments that move society forward.”

    2. Really?  You posted a CCA PR piece that cites '28 studies by leading academics' with no other information as a credible source????   OMG, that is some weak sauce even by Guppy standards. 

    4. None of that PR actually covers what we're talking about, though.

      We don't want to build a new prison, or save money doing so. We want to close a prison because we don't have enough prisoners to fill the prisons we have.

      The Gazette for once is right: "free market" forces favor government management of prisons when it comes to minimizing costs.

      1. What?  The Guppy posted non-credible irrelevant nonsense believeing it made his red-herring point?  Next you'll tell me the sun is going to rise tomorrow. 

  2. The clear promise during the pay freezes was it would be unrolled when revenues improved. Refusing a raise now is violating a promise to the people who make the government work. Not a good idea… If yu want the government to work well…

  3. http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2011/02/22/speaker-calls-government-workers-scum-upsetting-his-own-side-at-anti-union-rally/23552/

    The speaker in question was Gregory Golyansky, vice president of the Colorado Union of Taxpayers, who joined others on the west sidewalk at the Capitol to counter a rally of solidarity with Wisconsin workers.

    “I was born in the Soviet Union so I know what they want,” Golyansky said. “I’ve seen it before.”

    So far, so good. People cheered and waved flags and signs.

    “These people are storm troopers of communism. We must defeat them. I never realized there was that much scum on government payrolls … ,” Golynasky continued.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

109 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!