At least two Democrats are considering running against Rep. Scott Tipton, R-Colo., next year: state Sen. Gail Schwartz and Lt. Gov. Joe Garcia. Multiple state Democrats confirmed Schwartz and Garcia are being recruited to run in the state's 3rd Congressional District.
Schwartz, a two-term senator and the majority whip in Colorado's upper legislative chamber, cannot run for her seat again in 2014 due to term limits. Multiple state Democrats hailed her as a potentially strong fundraiser. Schwartz raised just over $235,000 for a razor-thin reelection victory in 2010, and she has been in touch with EMILY's List, the Democratic women’s group renowned for directing donations from its large member list to female candidates.
"We think she would make a strong candidate," EMILY's List spokeswoman Marcy Stech said when asked about Schwartz.
NJ's Scott Bland notes correctly that Lt. Gov. Joe Garcia has never won elective office himself, but has a plenty working in his favor as a potential challenger to Rep. Scott Tipton. As we've said before, Rep. Tipton's most vulnerable re-election cycle was probably his first in 2012, and it's going to be harder to pick him off now that the word "freshman" no longer applies. That said, Sen. Gail Schwartz or Lt. Gov. Garcia could pose a significant threat in a district that's drawn to be competitive each and every cycle.
Garcia's name is also interesting given that he was somewhat inexplicably floated as a potential pick for Obama's cabinet as Secretary of Labor. Not much came of that initial news, and Garcia was not selected, but getting his name floated on a high level certainly turned some heads in Colorado; it certainly wouldn't be unusual for someone like Garcia to get their name included as a "potential nominee" as a means of generating name ID for a different purpose (in this case, CD-3). Remember that before Michael Bennet was then-Gov. Bill Ritter's surprise choice for the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Ken Salazar, Bennet was being mentioned as a potential pick for Obama's first Secretary of Education.
And of course, even an entrenched Rep. Tipton could self-immolate any number of ways.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: coloradosane
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: unnamed
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: unnamed
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: Air Slash
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Markets Crash While Gabe Evans Plays Pool With Your Future
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I've been hoping Gail would run against Scott Gessler for SoS but I'd love to have her as my congresswoman.
I've been hoping Gail would run. She would be a good candidate and I would like another female congressional. That said, Joe Garcia would be an excellent candidate. Dude has accomplished a LOT
So important you have to say it twice?
Tipton welcomes the next Democrat loser to the race. No Democrat who helped with the gun grab will ever win in that district now.
Like you know anything about Tipton's district. Or at all, really.
Or any other district–school district, water district, fire protection district….
Who said something twice..? What the fuck are you talking about?
Once again, there is no gun grab. You have not once offered any reasonable explanation for what you object to in any of the actual legislation passed. You have never once cited a single fact. You just yell "gun grab" when nothing in the legislation calls for taking your guns away, if you even have any guns. We have guns in our home. There's nothing here that puts us in any danger of having them taken away.
Why don't you offer any legitimate explanation of your specific concerns? Why don't you use facts to argue your point? If referring to imaginary gun grabs and insulting liberals is all you've got, you've obviously got nothing. Certainly no credibility.