U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 08, 2013 12:09 PM UTC

Gessler vs. Democracy

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman
Scott Gessler.
Scott Gessler.

Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler made the rounds on conservative talk radio last week to stir up opposition to expected legislation that would give us more options when it comes to voting, stuff like providing a mail-in ballot for every eligible voter.

Basically, the legislation would make sure Colorado uses modern technology and election procedures to give people more ways to cast a ballot and to participate in our elections. And Gessler wants to stop it.

Colorado already has "really good elections," Gessler said conservatives in talk-radio land, bragging about Colorado's higher turnout than other states.

But why not do better? Even in a good year, over one-third of the voting-age population in Colorado doesn't go to the polls.

And even if everyone voted, what's wrong with giving people safe and easy voting choices? The bill in the State Legislature not only mandates the mail-in option, but also allows us to drop off our ballots at service centers and, if pushing buttons is your thing, to vote in person on election day or prior to it.

Not to sound all high-minded, but isn't America about giving everyone a chance to have their voice heard at the ballot box? Isn't offering the most best voting options and voter registration a baseline manifestation of that ideal?

Obviously, it is, so it was supremely ironic to hear our state's top election official, who's in charge of encouraging people to vote, arguing against basic improvements in our election system. 

Some friends and I tried to think of comparisons, and we came up with the notion of a top librarian insisting on hard-cover books only in libraries, rejecting alternatives such as e-books, large print, video, etc., and requiring people to reserve books in advance.

Or in terms of options, we thought of a Justice of the Peace only offering a civil union to a man and a women, without including an option for same-sex couples. I guess that's not quite the same, but still, it's equally unAmercian not to stand for inclusiveness.

On the radio, Gessler said the folks backing the election bill, which will likely be introduced soon, are doing it for partisan gain.

But evidence suggests that voter conveniences, like registering and voting on election day, don't favor one party over the other. And as for Gessler's other allegation that this would lead to fraud in a place like Colorado, there isn't any evidence supporting him.

Election officials can determine, in real time, if people try to vote twice using different voting options. When you think about it, and you consider what computers manage to do in modern life, you understand that this should be a no brainer, even for a guy like Gessler.

And obviously, more voting options are needed in today's world, where people move frequently and need ways to register quickly at a new location and then vote.

But this goes to something much bigger. It's about strengthening our state at the entry point to democracy.

What are we if don't do everything possible, within security constraints, to make our elections wide open to every citizen who wants to vote?

Tweet
Share

Comments

11 thoughts on “Gessler vs. Democracy”

  1. Meanwhile GOP County Clerk in Mesa County wrote a letter to the Sentinel in support of that legislation, which is derived from receommendations put out by the truly bipartisan CO County Clerks Assoc.  Dude is a hack. 

    1. Gessler obviously finds small democracy appalling.  All those "takers" with the right to vote? If he had his way there would probably be property requirements,  poll taxes and literacy tests that could be graded subjectively by officials to ensure that only the white, I'm sorry,"right" people passed.

  2. Why aren't you reporting anything Gessler actually said, Jason?

    http://coloradostatesman.com/content/994083-gessler-slams-election-bills-blasts-dems

    “Why are they behaving in secret, too? Why are they hiding from their constituents? Why are they unwilling to publicly discuss this stuff? Why are they doing it in secrecy?” Gessler asked of the clerks. “They’re doing a real disservice to the State of Colorado.”

    Above all, the secretary of state is outraged with a drafting process that he considers to be secretive. He believes Democrats will attempt to ram the legislation through with only a month left in the session.

    “How the hell can they rewrite the state election code in such as way that it excludes half of the entire legislature, the people who have expertise from a secretary of state’s standpoint?” he asked. “These people are just crazy. They have no interest in creating a good system. They are interested in shoving through an agenda.”

    Gessler blamed Democratic leaders, suggesting that they are hypocrites for having suggested a bipartisan agenda at the beginning of the legislative session.

    “You heard at the beginning of this legislative session the majority legislators talk about collaboration and cooperation and consensus. How wonderful they were going to be to work together. And they are completely hypocritical, they do not live up to their word, and they’re just pushing talking points on the people when in reality what they’re doing is shoving through an agenda with no consensus, no cooperation and no collaboration,” declared the conservative secretary.

    2. Umm, they provided links so your point, as usual, is pointless. Also see Repubican County Clerks who keep insisting the guy is carryng on about a non-problem.  So allow me to see your pointlessness and raise you a little off subject inquiry. Why aren't you condemning the gun nut threatening to use a knife to remove a heart vaginally only he describes the surgical route using the "c"  word?  Did your tongue get caught in the spin machine?

  3. Why do we need more laws?

    I live in Denver and my ability to vote is very easy.

    • They mail me a ballot and I walk 5 blocks to the park and deposit it in a big metal box.
    • My neighbors like voting in person so they walk 3 blocks to vote.

  4. Just once I'd like to read a story about a Republican politician and not find myself thinking,half way through the piece,"Is he stupid or does he think I am?" The answer to both questions, disturbingly, is usually "yes".

     

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

107 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!