U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 10, 2013 09:39 AM UTC

Election-Day Registration Means "Voter Fraud?" Prove It

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Excellent story today from the Durango Herald's Joe Hanel on the introduction of the comprehensive election modernization bill from Democrats, set to be introduced this week in the Colorado Senate:

Even before it has been introduced, the bill has touched off a partisan fight.

But La Plata County Clerk Tiffany Lee Parker, a Republican, supports the bill and says it’s not a partisan issue.

“To me, this is really bipartisan. This makes sense. This is not Republican versus Democrat,” Parker said. [Pols emphasis]

La Plata County's Republican Clerk Tiffany Parker is not alone in supporting this bill from the right as a practical measure to make it easier to vote in Colorado. As Hanel reports, much of the bill was initiated by the Colorado County Clerks Association, and much of the bill is very much uncontroversial–with the exception of legislative Republicans and Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler.

The divide between Gessler and the county clerks, who have never enjoyed particularly good relations, seems wider now than ever before as this bill comes up for debate. As we noted yesterday, Gessler is upset that he was not consulted though the county clerks were–in the Colorado Statesman story we cited:

“How the hell can they rewrite the state election code in such as way that it excludes half of the entire legislature, the people who have expertise from a secretary of state’s standpoint?” he asked. “These people are just crazy. They have no interest in creating a good system. They are interested in shoving through an agenda.”

The truth is, Secretary of State Gessler has not been considered an honest player in Colorado's election system for quite a while–and this is a feeling held by county clerks on both sides of the aisle. It's important to remember that in the last two years, Gessler has done more to menace Colorado elections than constructively work to improve them. At some point, unproductive viewpoints just don't help the process, and they get excluded.

The biggest bone of contention in the bill, by far, is the provision allowing voters to register all the way through Election Day. In much the same manner as the recent gun safety legislation debate, Republicans insist that this would have disastrous consequences–instead of "banning gun ownership," the story this time, as Hanel continues:

Same-day registration opens the door to voter fraud, said Colorado Republican Committee Chairman Ryan Call.

“This is nothing more than a partisan power-grab by Democrats, taken at the expense of integrity in our elections,” Call said in a news release. “The last thing Coloradans want is the legitimacy of our elections cast into doubt because of the serious potential for voter fraud.”

And much like the gun debate, your next reasonable question is, "what's your evidence for that?" 

Stats of same-day registration by state, 2012.
Stats of same-day registration by state, 2012.

This is probably where the rational argument will end, because as with the gun debate, there is no evidence to support the charge being made. Colorado is not the first state to propose allowing registration up through Election Day, just as we weren't the first state to limit magazines or require background checks. Eleven other states and the District of Columbia, including our neighbors Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana all have this law on the books.

And folks, did you hear about voter fraud scandals in Wyoming last year? Uh, no.

However, in Wyoming in 2012, according to preliminary data (see chart right) some 28,000 voters–11% of the vote in that state–used Election Day registration. And that's on the low side compared to a number of other states.

Is GOP Chairman Ryan Call alleging these were fraudulent votes in Wyoming last year? Or for that matter, any of these states? Half a million votes in Minnesota? That would be one hell of a scandal, wouldn't it?

Bottom line: the principal argument against the most "controversial" provision in this bill, that allowing registration to vote up through Election Day would have "serious potential for voter fraud," is not backed up by the facts–proven now that it has been successfully implemented in other states. What this bill will do, based on experience in other states, is significantly increase voter turnout. 

When you cut through the bluster from opponents with these facts, you begin to understand that increasing voter turnout, this goal you would think every American would hold sacrosanct, is what they really oppose.

We have to believe that if reporters ask honest questions, this is going to become painfully obvious.

Tweet
Share

Comments

13 thoughts on “Election-Day Registration Means “Voter Fraud?” Prove It”

    1. It is better and more satisfactory to deny a thousand citizens the vote than to let a single non-citizen cast a ballot. Or zero non-citizens. Whatever's clever.

  2. Registering at the polls is probably a better idea than the current system simply because poll workers are trained and supervised. Most false registrations have come from partisan registration drives or greedy workers being paid for high numbers. This eliminates that problem

  3. It is becoming increasingly clear that the best way to fight back agaist Republican attemts to discourage and suppress votes is ridicule. There's no defense against it. Here, watch: What are they afraid of? They must believe that if everyone who is elegible votes they'll lose.                                                                                     See how well that works?

     

  5. It's funny that Colorado Pols never mentioned Wisconsin…

    http://media2.620wtmj.com/breakingnews/ElectionResults_2004_VoterFraudInvestigation_MPD-SIU-A2474926.pdf

    Initially, the investigators were given the task to respond to the reported violations of the State of Wisconsin Election Laws by any entities or persons involved in the 2004 General Election. However, as the investigation began, numerous inconsistencies in the official records of the City of Milwaukee Election Commission became evident. The reports of more ballots cast than voters recorded were found to be true. The Election Commission conducted three separate counts of voters, which resulted in three different findings, none of which matched the final official ballot count reported to the Wisconsin State Elections Board.

    The investigators discovered that within the official records of the Election Commission individuals are recorded as having cast multiple ballots during the 2004 General Election. The possibility of “double votes” existed at the local level; between adjacent communities; and with a bordering state. We also note that by relying on the Milwaukee Election Commission records to arrive at this conclusion, “reasonable doubt” is an unfortunate factor. However, because of the flawed registration system in Wisconsin, “double voting” remains a strong possibility.

    Due to On-Site Registration, there is no real time filter employed to determine if an individual has cast more than one ballot in any particular election. The violation, if discovered, would only occur after the ballots have been cast. The damage would have already been done.

    During this Election, the investigators discovered that a person in the City of Milwaukee could register and vote under variations of their given name.

    This does open the door to fraud, and fraud has already occurred. Wake up, people! The Democrats want a permanent majority and this is how they want to get it.

    1. It does sound like they have a mess there. But the big problem they have is more cast ballots than voters. That's not a registration problem, that's a problem with handing a single registrant multiple ballots.

      As to a registration system that has the possibility of multiple registrations, do they have even one instance of someone doing so? 

    2. Jesus, am I the only one bothering to fact check this moron anymore?

      http://prwatch.org/news/2012/06/11569/rampant-voter-fraud-wisconsin-or-martians-are-coming

      In February of 2008, the Milwaukee Police Department released a report on that election "with what appears to be a painstaking investigation of the facts," according to the Brennan Center for Justice, but including "policy recommendations offered with less care and disavowed by the Milwaukee Police Chief."

      war of the worlds

      an image from 'The War of the Worlds'

       

      …Republicans across the country embraced the unauthorized report and its uninformed policy recommendations, with the Wall Street Journal's John Fund claiming that "Milwaukee police uncovered a problem, but politicians chose to ignore it."

      But the Brennan Center's review of the report "showed that much of what had originally been identified as potential fraud was in fact due to clerical error."

      Decade old discredited bullshit. I wish the GOP had better this these cheap shills.

      2. Sorry I'm leaving the heavy lifting to others. ArapaGOOP has been shamed discredited here so many times, I automatically assume he's just being a lying sack of shit Republicanisms.

  6. OMG!, Really. Pols!???

    You appear to have totally missed the point. You must be trying to miss the point.

    1.5 million voters in other states may not have committed voter fraud.  BUT – Colorado voters are different.  C'mon – seriously, we all know this.

     

  7. Wait. "…serious potential for voter fraud… "???  I thought we already had voter fraud. Buckets and buckets of it. Ferreted out by our crackerjack Repub SOS, even. What gives?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

62 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!