(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
Larry Pratt, Executive Director of Gun Owners of America, praised Weld County Sheriff John Cook recently for taking a "very strong stand on what he thinks the limits of the Federal government are."
Speaking to Greeley talk show host Scooter McGee, Pratt said some sheriffs around the country are ready to arrest federal officials if, in the sheriffs' views, they are violating the U.S. Constitution.
PRATT Well, I’m very encouraged by the number of sheriffs that–it’s at least pushing 400 now, that have said– there’s a spectrum. At a minimum, they’re saying they’re not going to cooperate with any unconstitutional gun grabs that the federal government might participate in. And at the other end of the spectrum, sheriffs are saying, “Not only will I not cooperate, but if the Feds are doing something unconstitutional in my county, particularly a gun grab, I’ll put them in jail.” But they’re also addressing other issues where the Feds act unconstitutionally and threaten to incarcerate citizens of their county, the sheriffs are interposing themselves and saying, “If you try to do that, you don’t have authority, and you’re not going to do that in my county, and if you try it, I will arrest you.” This has happened in confrontations with the Forest Service, BLM, the Food and Drug Administration, and of course, the ATF – the gun police.
In a column in the Cortez Journal Monday, Montezuma Country Sheriff Dennis Spruell echoed Pratt's comments, writing that if sheriffs "think a state or federal law contradicts the Constitution, they are under no obligation to enforce it."
It wasn't clear if Pratt thought Cooke would actually arrest federal officials, or if Spruell would arrest them, if necessary to enforce their views of the U.S. Constitution, so I called Cooke and Spruell to find out.
Cooke did not return my call immediately, but Spruell said, "I swore an oath to the Constitution, but there’s no law that says I can arrest someone who violates the Constitution."
In his radio interview, Pratt went on to point to a specific example of a situation, in addition to stopping alleged gun grabs, when Sheriffs need to exert their power and arrest the feds–when the Department of Education sends in a SWAT team to collect student loans.
PRATT: Well, it can get pretty absurd. There was a case last year, a young woman looked outside and realized that her residence was completely surrounded by the Men in Black. And when all the commotion finally subsided, it turned out that that was the Department of Education SWAT team, and they were coming for her because she was delinquent on her education [loans].
McGEE: Oh, on her student loans!
PRATT: Exactly. Now, the fact that in the past creditors were able to garnish your wages, put a lien on if you own your house, repo[ssess] your car–. Those are actually sensible, measured, equivalent responses to the problem. But now, if they have a SWAT team, they figure they got to use it, or else why do we ask the taxpayers to spend all this money on –
McGEE: And, when it comes to budgets, remember we spent a hundred and fifteen thousand dollars last year and we increase the budget every year and we have to justify it by spending it, and using it and—oh, my god, Larry. You’re absolutely right, again.
PRATT: So, off we go and the Department of Education is now using a SWAT team to collect delinquent student loans. Frankly, that’s where we need sheriffs. The sheriff needs to come in and say [affecting a ‘good ol’ boy, southern accent], “Boy, I don’t think you ought to be doing that.” And make sure that the boys understand that the sheriff is serious as a heart attack, that he is just talking smooth, and that he is not going to let them do that.
The Durango Herald will live stream a speech by Pratt in Durango today at 6:30 p.m.. He's in Colorado in support of efforts to recall State Rep. Mike McLachlan.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Lauren Boebert Picks Up George Santos’ Favorite Side Hustle
BY: allyncooper
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Lauren Boebert Picks Up George Santos’ Favorite Side Hustle
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Stanistan
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Before the Whackjob County sheriff rushes to arrest federal officials, I suggest he read the "court decision" that forever settled this question of federal vs. state/local soverignty. It didn't come from the U.S.
Supreme Court but from a little courthouse in Virginia — Appomattox Court House!
The decision was Grant vs. Lee.
I don't believe these right-wing extremists have any intention of paying attention to a court decision, or the losses and results of a previous civil war. They're following their own leaders, and part of their plan, it seems, is to utilize the "well regulated militias" of county sheriffs to achieve the aims of the extremists. Perhaps people in every county should begin trying to determine if their sheriff's allegiance is with the people, or with the extremists. It just might matter some day soon.
They don't want those pesky facts to threaten their freedom (to be an idiot).
Pratt appears to be, shall we say, truthfully challenged.
From Politico:
…and it wasn't the woman that was home, but her estranged husband.
…and it wasn't a SWAT team.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56530.html
So we can now save some money by getting rid of those nine expensive justices we no longer need to decide about such things.
That should help cut the deficit. Sheesh….
Yup, and while we're at it we can get rid of all the elected officials (including sheriffs) and those lazy bureaucrats – we don't need no stinking gubmint!
I say each sherrif should decide what is and is not constituional–state, federal, and hell LOCAL! We only need one law in these parts…and Lou's got himself his own tank next door that we can borrow, when things get too UN-constitutional…
Now, the brave BOCC in Delta County–I learned yesterday–spent taxmoney and time passing a resoultion AFFIRMING that they SUPPORT the Second Amendment! Thank goodness that is cleared up. But if not, Fred's just down the road, and he's LAW in them parts, and if he say's it ain't CONSTITUTIONAL I say that's good enough for me, and good enough for Delta County. Now what they over there in San Miguel is downright immoral.
What a concept: each of us decides which laws to ignore and which to follow.
I thought that was called anarchy.
Aye…let's just go back to the law of the jungle…you know….the one percent doctrine…that's the only rule we need.
I hope some sheriff in one of those litle-bitty piss-ant counties actually tries this. It would be wonderfully entertaining and might just settle some of these right-wing anarchists down. At least the county would be better off with their former sheriff in Federal prison.