President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
April 25, 2013 04:21 PM UTC
10 Comments
I only wish there were 100 more just like him.
Jebus — I really wish there were a hundred or so fewer . . .
David,
Here is a political question for you. Was the battle for the Alamo in 1863 or 1836?
That was the part that jumped out at me too. The last paragraph starts out, "In March of 1863, … a South Carolinian by the name of…" and I honestly thought the ad was going to ask Republicans to help re-fight the Civil War.
Yeah, amazing mistake when trying to come across as an unreconstructed Southerner.
Well, when Sandford runs for President, he has already lost Texas.
Wrong, again. Dr. Ron Paul, long time Texas Representative, has just sent out a fund raising letter for Sandford. However, the story was accompanied by a picture of Senator Rand Paul, who is the son of Ron Paul, not to be confused with Paul Ryan.
Hold on everybody. According to Eliot's air tight method of reasoning this ad can't be as stupid as it reads because Sanford couldn't be so stupid as to place it if it were that stupid. Doesn't that make perfect sense?
Further, it doesn't produce any political advantage, ergo (that's Latin which automatically wins any argument) no GOP pol, including Sanford, could possibly be responsible for it .
Either it doesn't exist and is perhaps a Dem black ops mind control thing making us all think it exists or it does but there is some perfectly smart message in it we aren't perceiving, the way we didn't see the duplicated white lady in the red against red mailer as a symbol of the dangers of duplicate voting. That should have been obvious and I'm sure all the recipients picked up on that.
Do not bother to dispute any of this. These are the simplest explanations and whatever anyone opposed to them might have to say is a wild stretch that ignores Gordian Knots or something. Or a tangent. Or not supported by any evidence. In fact, I bet nobody has any evidence that either of these perfectly sound explanations is not true. So there.
How'd I do? Well enough to fill in in case Eliot suffers a typing related inury?
Wait…. is this one of those "the stoppid" need represenatatin' too?
Naw- you got it.
Is His campaign manager named Clint, by chance?