U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 27, 2012 01:58 AM UTC

Good Fundraising Period for Sias; Hudak Still Leads

  • 0 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Although Republican Lang Sias hauled in more than twice as much money this period as State Senator Evie Hudak in the hyper-competitive SD-19 race, the incumbent still enjoys a 3-1 fundraising advantage.

In the filing period ending on May 2nd, Sias raised a whopping $23,600, spending just $2,000 of that. While that number is certainly nothing to shrug off, it’s important to remember that this was the first full period since Sias declared his candidacy. As such, Sias’ remarkable haul could be the exception, not the rule — the first fundraising quarter of any candidate tends to be their strongest because the “low-hanging fruit” is the easiest to pick off.

In the same period, Hudak brought in $11,500. While it’s only half of Sias’ total for the same period, it’s certainly respectable. Hudak has, after all, been preoccupied with the actual business of legislating, and her elected duties certainly limited the amount of time she had to campaign and raise money. Like Sias, Hudak only spent about $2,000.

In total, Hudak’s raised $73,000 and has about $55,000 on hand. Sias has raised $25,000 with $22,000 of that still in the bank.

Sias has ground to make up on Hudak. If he continues to outraise the incumbent by a factor of 2, however, he should be able to considerably narrow the gap. It’s unlikely that Sias will continue to best Hudak by such large margins — given that all the low-hanging fruit has already been harvested — but considering that Hudak represents a seat that leans Republican, Sias may not have too hard a time finding new donors.

Of course, that same competitiveness means that neither Hudak nor Sias will have to worry about their own numbers costing them the race: outside money will continue to pour into the district and will likely shift the campaign more than the respective fundraising numbers of either candidate.  

Comments

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

112 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!