President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
May 24, 2011 06:36 PM UTC
4 Comments
I’m not trying to rationalize Hancock’s answers at all. I don’t have to. Like all good leaders, Hancock can admit it when he makes mistakes. He has said that he doesn’t believe in creationism in schools.
That’s a fact that is pointedly absent from Romer’s campaign literature. In the law, there is such a thing as lying by omission. There is no Romer campaign piece longer than 10 words, of which I’m aware, that does not incorporate a lie–whether direct or by omission.
Documented lies and unethical practices of Romer for Mayor:
Lie #1: Romer’s first ad claimed that he brought more AP classes to a struggling school. The Principal at that school said he didn’t.
Lie #2: Hancock voted himself a pay raise. That is a patently false claim because under the law Hancock could only vote for the incoming council’s pay raise and, if elected Mayor, said long before the ad ran that he would not take any Mayoral pay raise.
Lie #3: Romer tried to take credit for the deal that created Union Station. One of his own supporters said that he served only in an advisory capacity.
Lie #4: Romer told Rep. Joel Judd that he would support legislation to garnish casino winnings of deadbeat parents. Romer switched his vote and sided with casinos against the bill.
Unethical Practice #1 “Citizens for Accountability” has documented ties to the Romer camp has sent out a misleading mailer attacking Hancock for beliefs that, even if he holds them, are not in any way germain to the position of Mayor.
Are you kidding me? You created your profile today just to post this “legal” opinion??
Pols had it right that the Hancock people had been bracing for this negative piece, they even assined a staffer to join the site and post the talking points!
You’re calling someone else a sock puppet? Hilarious, since you were a paid Mejia shill.
Sorry to disappoint, but just not the case. As things turned out I did vote for James, largely because I thought he had the best chance to beat Romer.
As it sits, Hancock may get it done, but calling anything that has been said publically in this race as “dirty politics” is laughable.
This has been a hug-fest compared to what should have come out given Romer’s L-O-N-G list of pay-2-play scandals, which are well-known to the Pols crowd.
If Hancock loses this thing, he’ll have only himself to blame for not informing the voting public of the facts behind Romer.
Back to the point at hand. Further sockpuppet proof on PComm, he/she posted the EXACT same language on the Post yesterday.
Come on, AT LEAST come up with an original thought…