President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 12, 2013 10:30 AM UTC

Radio host notes no irony when Wadhams says 1) GOP needs non-alienating candidates and 2) Gessler would be "strong" choice

  • 4 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Former state GOP Chairman Dick Wadhams believes Colorado Republicans should find state-wide candidates modeled after Wayne Allard, Bill Armstrong, Bill Owens, and Hank Brown.

"They were candidates that appealed to a broad section of Coloradans," Wadhams told internet-radio host Art Carlson Saturday. "They didn't go out of their way to alienate any Colorado voter. And as a result, they won in a state that's very competitive, like Colorado. And that's what we need in 2014."

Nothing unusual there, but the funny part was, Wadhams went on to praise a possible GOP candidate who's obviously among the most alienating public figures in Colorado.

"I think it's difficult to start a campaign when you're dealing with those ethical assaults [resulting form the ethics investigation Gessler faces]," Wadhams told Calrson. "But if Scott can get past them, if he can get beyond those charges against him, he'll emerge as a strong candidate." 

What about the need to find a person who won't "alienate any Colorado voter?" I can think of at least a few voters that Gessler might have alienated, maybe Hispanics and minorities, for example, but unfortunately Carlson let the topic slide by. 

Wadhams called Gessler "a great friend," who's "done some great work as Secretary of State."

"It's now been 11 years since Republicans won a race United States Senate or for Governor," Wadhams told the internet audience. "…The common thread among the people who've won statewide for governor and senator as Republicans is that they were very disciplined candidates."

"If the intention is to win an election, I think Republicans have to take this seriously and really make a decision on who can win," said Wadhams. "And that's not because they become overnight liberals or something. Wayne Allard and Bill Owens were two of the most conservative legislators when they ran for state-wide office and yet they could articulate their conservative agenda in a very open and welcoming way for all Coloradans to consider. We don't need Republicans who will alienate large blocs of voters."

If I were host Carlson, I would have asked Wadhams if substantive changes, even itsy bitsy ones, are required by GOP candidates to avoid the alienation trap.

Or is this all about messaging, like Wadhams implies? What about some specific policy proposals related to abortion? Hispanics? The environment? Poverty? Healthcare? Education? Taxes?

Those issues never came up. Carlson should have dug deep and asked about them.

Comments

4 thoughts on “Radio host notes no irony when Wadhams says 1) GOP needs non-alienating candidates and 2) Gessler would be “strong” choice

  1.  if substantive changes, even itsy bitsy ones, are required by GOP candidates to avoid the alienation trap.

    I'm thinking they are still convinced that they can manipulate a victory….as opposed to winning an election. But that's crazy…isn't it?

  2. As for not noting irony, it's pretty clear that far righties have an apparently genetic inability to detect it. Maybe it's tied to the gene that causes their over active startle response.

    1. +100. And I'm more and more convinced this 'startle response' is a fusion of genetics coupled with the 'water-boarding' conditioning they get 24/7. I watched family members in dismay last election eve as they ingested  every calorie of crow pie Faux News was feeding them and then watched in disbelief as Megan Kelly took on Karl Rove. It was an extremely sad moment for me – not our victory – but to watch family who at one time were solid "Eisenhower Republicans" morph into today's version of ""Republican" thanks to the ilk of Karl Rove and his minions at Faux. 

      1. That must be very sad. I'm lucky enough to come from a family of pro-labor Dems who arrived here in my grandparents' generation.  I only have one uncle who went over to th dark Limbaugh/Fox side and took his wife and kids with him. It's hard  for the rest of us to wrap our heads around this as he and his wife and kids are all very intelligent and educated. We all have to remember to shut up about politics at family gatherings now and that's not natural for my very mouthy and politically tuned in family. It's a strain. I'm sure it's even more of a strain for my uncle's family, knowing that they are the black sheep everyone else thinks are nuts on this stuff.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

89 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!