President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 08, 2013 09:06 AM UTC
9 Comments
Maybe Eliot should take a crack at this one. No wait. That would only lead to a 100+ post thread of evasions and faulty logic.
Also, this is Caldera expresssing his persecution complex.
The GOP's "we are the victims here" standard excuse for their inexcusible behavior and overheated rhetoric.
There's a name for these type of groups that peddle disinformation. Can't put my finger on it though…
But, …but I have read this quote attributed to Morse many, many times. Therefore he must have said it. Or meant it.
Hey, I am all for removing violence from society.
This means no more government because the very premise of government is based on coercion and violence. Government is simply one group of violent people aggressing towards another group of violent people.
Without violence, government could not exist…
BTW Caldara should resign and let a capable person defend and expand Liberty. Coors loves him but that isn’t saying much.
I'm OK if you want to secede Nockers. Maybe there's a 'transit area' in DIA or something where you can be a nation of 1.
Honestly, Nock…
Do you even read what you write? Turn it around…without government, violence will SURELY exist!
The premise of government is not based on coercion and violence. Unless you are talking about the kind of government you apparently happen to favor. (I think it is referred to as "Feudalism", or "Plutarchy" in the modern vernacular).
Government should be based on cooperation and fairness…on peaceful resoultion to differences through understanding, forbearance, kindness…you know …all those "gifts" you pronounced about in the open thread.
Try thinking before you type….
note: resolution, that is..
Above all else, government exists to provide security, which is accomplished by having a monopoly on force. In the absence of a monopoly on force, you have no government. So in the strict sense you are correct about violence.
However, the reverse is also true: without government you have violence. The degree of violence in the abscence of government is greater and more severe than with the existence of government.