As the Colorado Statesman's Peter Marcus reports–you might not agree, but be aware of this spin:
Motivated by a grassroots uprising this summer that ousted two sitting Democratic state senators, proponents of a ballot initiative that would ask voters in 2014 to define an unborn child as a “person” say they are likely to target Republicans who don’t support their anti-abortion movement…
Keith Mason, president of Personhood USA, said his organization and its followers feel empowered after gun rights activists and liberty groups were able to take down Senate President John Morse and Sen. Angela Giron last month with limited financing compared to recall opponents. Similar to personhood, the efforts were assembled by a grassroots base that felt overlooked by state officeholders.
Mason points out that his volunteers inserted themselves into the recall elections, where personhood once again became an issue. Political attack ads highlighted the Republican successor candidates’ support for personhood. Bernie Herpin in Colorado Springs and George Rivera in Pueblo faced the assaults.
Herpin found himself on the defensive, vowing that he did not support personhood. But Rivera unapologetically stated his support for the drive.
In response, Mason said personhood supporters sent volunteers to Pueblo to help Rivera, but ignored Herpin in Colorado Springs because he rejected the initiative.
Supporters of the "Personhood" abortion ban constitutional amendments, which appeared on the ballot in Colorado in 2008 and 2010 and only narrowly missed the ballot again in 2012, have at times been quite belligerent with their fellow Republicans who express an insufficient degree of support. The reason is simple: the issue of banning abortions can be as damaging to Republicans campaigning in a general election as it is a litmus test in a Republican primary. The best example was probably the assault on U.S. Senate candidate Bob Schaffer, who faced withering criticism for his failure to endorse the 2008 initiative–complicated by Schaffer's defense of labor practices in the Mariana Islands which allegedly included forced abortions on pregnant female workers. In 2010 and to a greater extent 2012, Personhood proponents softpedaled their criticism of Republicans who were by then in full retreat on the issue–at least publicly.
Well, folks, antithetical to the desire by most Republicans to keep themselves out of this toxic wedge-issue fray, the Personhooders evidently think the recent recalls prove they were right all along. Sen. George Rivera's victory in Pueblo, whatever the true reasons, seems to have persuaded the anti-abortion movement to double down–which means taking a public stand for or against Republican candidates based on their support.
However giddy with victory they may be, we know Republicans who will find that prospect absolutely horrifying.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Stanistan
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
2014 is shaping up.
Personhood, recalls, Buck, Coffman (who needs a flip-floppy, buck-pedalish nickname).
WHo can the D's put up in CD3?
I 'm a believer – voters aren't dumb enough to just keep sending Tipton.
Not dumb enough? Spent time in Mesa County lately?
And just who do you think might beat Tipton?
That makes as much sense as Giron claiming vote suppression.
No mail in IS voter suppression.
And Giron was correct. My only disagreement with others on this is that it was enough to account for 12 point loss. It wasn't but it was real and it very much did account for the Morse loss.
Personhood and abortion were probably a factor in driving conservative, pro-life voters to the polls in Pueblo's recall election, but I think Personhood USA's Keith Mason is wrong in claiming it as a major factor. The NRA got its people out, based on their propaganda that the moderate gun legislation was a "slippery slope" to gun confiscation. Liberal Dems did not get our base to the polls the way we needed to, mostly because of the lack of mail-in-ballots.
"Personhood" was an issue, albeit a minor one. The first pieces of evidence I have on this are anecdotal:
Pueblo is a very Catholic town. The three ethnic groups which made up most of the steelworkers in the town's heyday were Italian, Mexican, and Slavic. Guess which religion predominated among those?
So many of my middle school and high school students wear the little rosary icon bracelets, come to school with ashes on foreheads during Lent. When abortion comes up as a writing or debate topic, I get vitriolic essays about selfish sluts from the girls. Many of my neighbors go to Mass more than once a week.
Now, Catholics use birth control and access abortions as much as anyone else – but they don't brag or make political points about it. It's a private, hidden thing. So, as I've said ad nauseum on here, I think we Dems were overdoing it with the 6-8 mailers of the sad and angry women, whom Rivera would deny access to birth control and abortion. We could and should have emphasized other issues (water, guns). But apparently, emphasizing "personhood" was what the Dems push poll said to do.
Personhood voters are also gun-rights voters.
Conservative and moderate voters definitely came out to vote. The liberal base did not. The PPP poll the weekend before the recall polled 597 voters, 72% of whom were moderate to very conservative. 62% were older than 46, and about half were Democrats, who had voted for Obama in 2012. 58% were female.
I would guess that this is the same demographic (with fewer Democrats than Republicans plus Unaffiliated) that showed up to vote in Pueblo September 10. The PPP poll did not ask any reproductive rights questions. The most striking poll result was the 53% approval of the NRA, which says to me that these folks were moved by the NRA propaganda ("They're a'comin' to getcher guns!")
So my takeaway from reviewing this poll is that it's impossible to untangle or uncouple concern for gun owners from concern for the unborn "person". "Personhood" proponents know that the gun rights loyalists also support "personhood".
In Pueblo, most of the 53% NRA loyalists who showed up to vote in the recall were likely also strong advocates of personhood and against abortion. Only 27% of those who wanted stricter gun laws on the SurveyUSA poll also wanted to keep abortion legal.
This seems counterintuitive and ironic to me – children are dying from gun violence all over America. But if they're not actually in the womb, only liberal Democrats seem to care.
. . . a whole lotta' Papists in Pueblo — even/especially among the D's. Was this the decideing factor? – No! Was it a factor on some level? – Undoubtedly!