U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 06, 2014 01:02 PM UTC

Rove-Style Audacity: Attacking Mark Udall On National Security

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Sens. Mark Udall (D-CO) and Ron Wyden (D-OR).
Sens. Mark Udall (D-CO) and Ron Wyden (D-OR).

​As you may have read in the New York Times this week, Colorado Sen. Mark Udall is front-and-center in another controversy over "extraordinary measures" taken in recent years to protect national security:

The Central Intelligence Agency’s attempt to keep secret the details of a defunct detention and interrogation program has escalated a battle between the agency and members of Congress and led to an investigation by the C.I.A.’s internal watchdog into the conduct of agency employees.

The agency’s inspector general began the inquiry partly as a response to complaints from members of Congress that C.I.A. employees were improperly monitoring the work of staff members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to government officials with knowledge of the investigation…

The specifics of the inspector general’s investigation are unclear. But several officials interviewed in recent days — all of whom insisted on anonymity, citing a continuing inquiry — said it began after the C.I.A. took what Senator Mark Udall, Democrat of Colorado, on Tuesday called an “unprecedented action” against the committee.

The action, which Mr. Udall did not describe, took place after C.I.A. officials came to suspect that congressional staff members had gained unauthorized access to agency documents during the course of the Intelligence Committee’s years-long investigation into the detention and interrogation program.

As you can see, the details of this latest incident between inquiring elected officials and the "national security community" are shrouded in mystery–because they are classified. Even when someone in Udall's position feels they must speak out about improprieties they become aware of through classified information they are privy to, in most cases, they can't. In this latest case, reports suggest that the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring computers used by Senate staff. The Denver Post's Lynn Bartels reported Tuesday night:

Various news agencies reported the CIA is now investigating whether its officers improperly monitored committee staffers and possibly their computers after Udall publicly revealed in December the existence of an internal CIA report that contradicted public comments about the program. The CIA questioned how the committee got the report.

"I'm deeply concerned that the CIA is trying to subvert congressional oversight through intimidation," Udall told The Post. "My job is to fight like hell to make sure the CIA never dodges congressional oversight again and that the White House publicly commits to declassify as much of the intelligence's committee report as possible."

He conceded that might not make him popular with the president, but Udall said his oversight role is "sacred, regardless of who is in the White House."

Politically, this latest clash with the Obama administration over national security policies (and excesses) is quite good for Sen. Udall. With President Barack Obama's approval numbers suffering post-Obamacare rollout, Udall's public role in opposition to controversial national security issues like harsh interrogation methods and domestic surveillance provide a means of differentiating Udall from Obama with Colorado's independent electorate. Although most Republicans–and yes, some Democrats–have to reckon with personal hypocrisy, Udall does not–and can credibly hold civil liberties and national security up as evidence of his independence.

With all of this in mind, we're amused to see conservative mouthpieces trying to attack Udall on this issue:

One of the earliest time-honored strategies developed by Republican brainiac Karl Rove is the simple practice of never leaving any issue unanswered–even where one's opponent is the very strongest. We're seeing more attempts like the Tweet above by Republicans to attack Udall over his handling of national security issues from the left–that is, attempting to claim that Udall "didn't do enough" to stop the practices he has decried in cryptic terms from his position on the Senate Select Intelligence Committee.

Of course, Udall couldn't do that, any more than he can go into details about this latest controversy involving Senate staffers and the CIA. Because the information is classified. Any reasonable analysis makes clear Udall has done everything he could do to alert the American public about these controversies, and is one of very few lawmakers in either party who civil liberties advocates can trust.

Hopefully, it will make more than a few chutzpah-laden Tweets to change that perception.

Tweet
Share

Comments

13 thoughts on “Rove-Style Audacity: Attacking Mark Udall On National Security”

    1. Since you're talking about Peak Politics, take a look at what they just put up on this very subject:

      http://coloradopeakpolitics.com/2014/03/06/exclusive-udallobama-cia-skirmish-elaborate-scheme-to-distance-senator-from-president/

      EXCLUSIVE: Udall/Obama CIA Skirmish Elaborate Scheme to Distance Senator from President

      Published on March 6, 2014 by ColoradoPeakPolitics

       

      According to Democratic insiders, the public announcement that liberal Sen. Mark Udall is fighting with the Obama administration over a stolen detention and interrogation treatment report is nothing more than an elaborate ruse to distance the embattled Senator from the unpopular President.  Lynn Bartels at The Denver Post reported on the skirmish:

      Various news agencies reported the CIA is now investigating whether its officers improperly monitored committee staffers and possibly their computers after Udall publicly revealed in December the existence of an internal CIA report that contradicted public comments about the program. The CIA questioned how the committee got the report.

      “I’m deeply concerned that the CIA is trying to subvert congressional oversight through intimidation,” Udall told The Post. “My job is to fight like hell to make sure the CIA never dodges congressional oversight again and that the White House publicly commits to declassify as much of the intelligence’s committee report as possible.”

      He conceded that might not make him popular with the president, but Udall said his oversight role is “sacred, regardless of who is in the White House.”

      Right, Sen. Udall.  Let us remind you, PeakNation™, that this is the man who voted for President Obama’s agenda 99% of the time.  Udall’s White House criticism rings a little hollow.  But, this revelation from a Democratic strategist highlights two questions:

      1) How did Udall and Obama sneak this scheme past Bloodhound for BS, Lynn Bartels?

      2) Who actually stole the CIA documents from the CIA?  Here’s the summary of the situation fromMcClatchy:

      Congressional aides involved in preparing the Senate Intelligence Committee’s unreleased study of the CIA’s secret interrogation and detention program walked out of the spy agency’s fortress-like headquarters with classified documents that the CIA contended they weren’t authorized to have, McClatchy has learned.

      And more about the stolen docs from McClatchy:

      Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., a member of the Intelligence Committee who has led calls for the release of the report, disclosed at a hearing in December the existence of the Panetta review without saying how the committee had learned of it.

      So, Sen. Udall, how exactly did you and the Senate Intelligence Committee come into possession of these documents?  Was it your staff that stole them or was it another of your committee members’ staff?

       

      Regardless, perhaps Udall is now also taking cues from the White House playbook – never let a crisis go to waste?

        1. Why should I trust Colorado Pols's "GOP insiders" and not Peak's "Democrat insiders?" Besides, Pols admits this whole thing is political in their OP.

  2. Rove style idiocy, maybe.

    Sen. Udall's strong position on national security issues is the same position loved by many Tea Party stalwarts. Bringing up Udall's position – his leadership – on the issue gives Udall a platform to promote his candidacy to independents who are worried about big government issues like NSA/CIA/FBI spying.

  3. Udall didn't just start talking about this stuff. It's been a major concern of his for a long time now and it's going to be a big positive for him with Dems and Indies who share that concern.

    You righties can't have it both ways. You can't attack him for voting with Obama too much and also attack him for objecting to security policies under Obama. Although you'll keep trying. If Udall changed his tune tomorrow then it would be back to criticizing him for being too willing to do Obama's bidding. 

    Your team is going to lose this race, Modster, and while I don't predict a landslide for Udall, I do predict a comfortable enough victory that it won't be keeping us up all night.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

211 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!