U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 24, 2014 09:12 AM UTC
9 Comments
Udall is a Liar (if you like your health care plan you can keep it, etc.), so why is anybody concerned about whether what he says is, or is not, a lie. By sheer numbers sometimes what he says is true, sometimes it is a lie. It makes no difference to him, why should it to Pols.
As a constituent of Cory's, I'm still waiting for the proof.…
I can't wait for Senator Udall to take down Con Man at the upcoming debates over this particularly brazen lie!
Your unmitigated gall and shameless chutzpah in daring to call ANYONE a liar, after publically admitting to being a chronic and habitual liar yourself ("it's how the gane is played" — YOUR WORDS), is rivaled only by your breathtaking ignornace and profound churlishness.
What you and fellow liar Gardner (aka Con-Man Cory") fail to grasp is that your own past words and deeds are already out there, on record, on tape, in print, online, forever, refuting and your current lies at every turn as you slither forward.
You are both truly despicable, craven, and, evidently, quite proud of it.
Well, at least you admit that AC takes pride in his work
You'll just tie yourself in knots if you try to distract us from Gardner's transparent attempt to have it both ways with the old if x always lies riddle.
– See more at: http://coloradopols.com/diary/55938/not-a-lie-for-udall-to-claim-gardner-opposes-abortion-for-rape#sthash.ulMCTvP2.dpuf
The only lame look over there response we'll ever get from him. If you believe that all abortion is wrong that includes all circumstances, including rape and incest. That's what the word "all' means. By claiming that you're refusal to, in additon to that blanket claim, also claim opposition to the specific cases of rape and abortion means a person is incorrect in saying that your blanket claim must, by definition of the word "all", include those cases is laughable. If Gardner really does not oppose abortion in the cases of rape and incest then he must stop using the word "all" and substitute another word, such as "most". He wants to have it both ways. Nobody is buying it.
oops… just "your", no apostrophying needed.
I wish I could caption that photo of Cory in the Keys:
" pre-existing conditions RULE ! "