The Colorado Statesman's Ernest Luning follows up in the latest issue last week's big story of endorsements rolling in for Republican gubernatorial primary candidate Bob Beauprez. With Beauprez calling in his many chits, Tom Tancredo standing firm on his built-in base of single issue support, and Mike Kopp fading quickly into irrelevance, Secretary of State Scott Gessler is battling to keep this a three-way race:
Calling Beauprez “a good friend of mine,” Gessler noted that he’s worked for Beauprez’ past campaigns in his capacity as an election-law attorney. (Beauprez represented the 7th Congressional District for two terms before giving up his seat in Congress to run for governor in 2006, when he lost to Democrat Bill Ritter by a wide margin.)
“Bob lost his last bid for Governor by 16 points, even though we won other big races that year,” Gessler wrote in his fundraising email. “That means 16 percent of voters deliberately voted against Bob then voted for every other Republican. We can’t risk that happening again, and especially with the Senate seat up for grabs this cycle that’s not a risk we can afford to take.”
…On Thursday, Gessler widened his attack, calling out both Beauprez and Tancredo for losing in the last two gubernatorial elections.
“Should we go with Bob Beauprez — an establishment politician with a track record of losing big races?” Gessler wrote in an email to supporters. “While he was chairman of the Colorado Republican Party, the GOP lost control of the State Senate for the first time in four decades. Then, in 2006, Beauprez lost the governor’s race by nearly 17 points, one of the worse performances by a statewide GOP candidate in the history of the state!”
“That is until 2010…” Gessler continued. “In 2010, Tom Tancredo cost us the governorship and a U.S. Senate seat. He dropped the ‘R’ next to his name and ran as a third party candidate. After he lost, he re-registered as a Republican. How can we trust a guy like that to lead our state, let alone, our party?”
Gessler has his own very serious baggage, of course, from his fruitless years-long quest for "illegal voters" to last year's Independent Ethics Commission finding that Gessler "breached the public trust for private gain" by using taxpayer funds to offset partisan political travel expenses. The ad fodder Gessler has provided his political opponents since election in 2010 has been truly enormous, even career-ending all by itself–but is Gessler correct that Beauprez's and Tancredo's flaws are worse?
After the nonstop roller-coaster of controversy Gessler has put voters through in the last four years, it's tough to imagine him as the most electable of any field of candidates. But maybe it's time we started grading this race on the curve? A poll follows.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Jams Fest
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Tough poll question. "Who is most electable?" would probably be Beauprez. "Who would receive the best election results?" is probably Tancredo. Beauprez, if he could figure out how to run a winning campaign, probably has a better top end potential than Tancredo – but Tancredo is IMHO more likely to execute his campaign well, and he's proven that even as a third party candidate he can draw in significant numbers of voters.
Gessler is absolutely right! Neither Tancredo nor Beauprez can win, in fact that have both lost the governor's race – both losers!! I completely agree that Gessler is the most electable of the GOP pack by a mile, even more so when you remove Colorado Pol's obvious bias against all Republicans. Even they grudgingly admit that Gessler is the most electable Republican in this race.
I'm glad to see Gessler taking the fight to his opponents. Soon he will do the same to Hickenlooper.
Poor Honey Badger. No respect. Not even from the CO Springs gazette. After all he's done for the party…
See you June 25th, when Scott Gessler is the nominee.
And you on November 5th, when Hick is still governor.
There is dirt to come out on Hickenlooper before November. You may be in for a surprise.
Not really. A GOP friend let it slip awhile ago over dinner. Pure GOP BS.
You are a loathsome putz.
Hey, Moddy, Bring it on. If you don't have anything to offer, you might as well try to bring down the other guy.
The first rule of oppo is not to talk about oppo. If you have it, you've blown it by letting the other guy know and giving him a chance to get in front of it. If you don't you sound like a blowhard.
Option #2
You Gessler fanboys are alll alike. All two of you.
Using your reasoning, Abraham Lincoln should have been rejected by the Republican Party at the national convention in Chicago in 1860 because he had lost many elections and in fact hadn't won one since 1846 (14 years). Taking it a step farther, you'd ageree the Republicans should have turned down Richard Nixon at the 1968 national convention because he lost the presidential race in 1960 and a race for governor of California two years later. But most important of all, you'd agree the Republicans should have turned away from Ronald Reagan at the 1980 convention because he lost two bids for president prior to that in 1968 (Richard Nixon) and 1976 (Jerry Ford). Right?
I said Kopp because voters know the least about him…to his advantage.
Least-damaged goods.
Denver Business Journal Poll – Gessler being trounced
Admittedly, the DBJ poll is unscientific but if Gessler was really the candidate of choice on the Republican side of the fence he'd be doing much better than this:
Hickenlooper 45%
Beauprez 20%
Koop 12%
Gessler 7%
Tancredo 7%
Undecided 7%
Looks like the business community holds Mr. Gessler in the same high esteem they hold Mr. Tancredo.
Business people usually don't respect those who start out with a surplus, blow it on unnecessary litigation and fee holidays, then blame someone else.
Not CEO material.
Well said!
I can't believe you're posting some garbage online poll as news. That's ridiculous.
And this is a troll who knows garbage when he spews — er, sees — it!
Fuck you! You'd have posted it two days ago if it were SlimyG with the 45%!!!
On second thought, fuck you!