President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
June 27, 2014 01:46 PM UTC
18 Comments
It's not necessary to try to convince “our readers” that mainstream Republicans don't believe all that demon and cancer stuff. We already know that that's what they do believe.
Unless and until Ryan Call or any “sane” Republican disagrees with any of Klingenschmitt's positions, it's reasonable to attribute these positions to all Republicans.
Just saying “Well, he's nuts.” and not disclosing why they think what they think is just another dodge, another way of agreeing with Klingenschmitt's positions without saying so.
I'm trying to put this thing in perspective. I understand that Ryan Call has to try to distance himself and his party's leadership from this guy, but this guy is not all that much of an isolated freak. They had Welker who published that ghastly e-newsletter. They had Scott Renfroe who once referenced the Old Testament as for how to respond to gay rights issues. Charlie Duke use to have auditory hallucinations when he was in the House. Doug Bruce (need I say more). Laura Waters-Woods and Tony Sanchez are trying to join Chaps.
What is really mind boggling is trying to think of a Democrat in the state House of Representative or state Senate who would be the left-wing counterpart to Dr. Chaps. I cannot think of one.
There isn't one.
If "Dr. Chaps" was the only example, we could reasonably assume the Republicans made a mistake, sigh, and let it go as an outlier but the problem is the Colorado Republican Party continues to nominate whackos from the top to the bottom of the ticket. Beauprez and Gardner, along with Dr. Chaps, are just two of this year's crop of off-the-wall Republicans. Both Beauprez and Gardner support the Personhood amendment and both are against immigration reform. Beauprez has endorsed the "birther" movement, endorsed a disgraced FBI agent's rants that the Muslim Brotherhood controls U.S. Foreign Policy under President Obama, called climate change a hoax and generally adopted most of the lunatic fringe conspiracy theories he's come in contact with.
Beauprez continues, as he did in 2006, to insist he will cut state taxes if elected governor, including eliminating the personal property tax which, in some rural counties, provides up to 80% of the county tax revenues. Just ask Moffat County what the elimination of that tax would do to their tax base and see what the answer is.
He wants to cut state income taxes which haven't been raised in over twenty years. How does he propose to pay for highway construction and maintenance (go back to gravel roads?). How does he expect to fund higher education (higher tuition – its the only option if he cuts tax reneues?). The bottom line is obvious. Beauprez, like he did in 2006, has not even attempted to think thorugh what he supports and the consequences.
Another example. On his blog "A Line of Sight," one of Beauprez's contributing editors (Brian Anderson), posted an article on February 24, 2014 entitled "Occupational Licensing Needs to Go." In the article, Anderson asserts that the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies licensing boards, including the Dental and Medical boards (you know – the ones who license doctors and dentists to insure they're competent and have graduated from an accredited professional schools) should be terminated because the professions will regulate themselves and patients are referred to doctors and dentists by their friends; and, if by chance, someone treats them who is incompetent, the patient can resort to legal remedies, even though Beauprez simultaneously supports severely curtailing or ending medical malpractice suits. Beauprez has said over and over again this year that he will end government regulations to get government out of the way of the free enterprise system. That raises the question of whether his support includes terminating the medical and dental licensing boards at DORA. It is a legitimate question since one of his contributing editors, on the blog he owns and manages as publisher, asserted that posdition. In other words, does Beauprez want to turn the voters over to unlicensed medical and dental practicioners who may or may not have the proper training and background in the name of free market profit while simultaneously taking the position that the right of an individual to bring a medical malpractice case should be severely restricted?
Beauprez, like he did in 2006, continues to take positions without ever analyzing how one position contradicts one of his other platitudes. He hasn't thought through anything and that will become more obvious as the general election campaign develops.
The Republican Party, as now constituted, needs to be terminated and reconstituted as a responsible conservative counter weight to the Democratic Party. Dr. Chaps, Beauprez and Gardner are just the latest examples of why this needs to happen.
Well said. Now if they could just formally declare Moral, Ethical and Intellectual Bankruptcy, and file a reorganization plan to kick out the Birchers, KKK'ers, Teahadists and assorted other wackos, the currently unaffiliated ex-Republicans like my wife would welcome a party that finally came back to its senses, pre-Reagan era.
+100
And he's supposed to represent the moderate wing of th party. Which means the GOTP now runs from stupid/crazy to stupid/crazier to stupid/craziest. Yet the same people who will be hurt the most and the same counties that will be hurt the most continue to vote for these people. What's it going to take? You can bet all those folks in Oklahoma now complaining about fracking caused earthquakes, as if they don't have enough to worry about what with all the tornadoes, would never dream of voting for a tree hugging Dem. WTF do they expect if they continue to put things like the most extreme anti-choice stance, pols who promise to hate and obstruct the government they're elected to, the one represented by the flag they love to drape themselves in, and opposition the very taxes their communities are going to die without above every other practical consideration? Considerations such as some protection against compleely phony doctors and dentists.
I never heard that one of his minions is pushing deregulation of professional licensing! He's gotten even wackier than he was 8 years ago…..
This has been going on in libertarian circles for some years, though this is the first time I've heard of anyone in the Republican Party advocating it.
Once again, the supposedly more moderate one among the would be R Governors. What does that say about the contemporary Republican party? Any distinction between the so called establishment and the so called Tea Party, the m so called moderates and the so called loons, is meaningless for all practical purposes. It is the party of loons.
I notice that Ryan Call's distance doesn't go as far as to say “Don't vote for these whack-jobs.” Apparently he and so called mainstream Republicans think that anyone with an “R” after their name is better for the state. It just doesn't matter how bigoted or theocratic they are.
Klingenschmitt's vision for the U.S. is indistinguishable from what we see in Saudi Arabia. Change the religious symbols and he'd be fine with chopping off hands for theft and stoning women for non-virginity.
The really repellent thing is that lots of Americans agree with him. Given the district he's running in there may be some voters with “R” tattooed on their foreheads who don't know his specific malfunction. But after 20 years of the religious right poisoning our politics, it shouldn't surprise anyone, including Ryan Call, that he holds these vile positions.
Please, everyone, talk about Klingenschmitt a lot. Write letters to the Gazette, the Independent, college news outlets in the Springs. Get on talk radio.
Especially if you live in HD15, this is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to actually get some decent, sane representation. If you volunteer and donate for the Lois Fornander campaign, that is.
This race can keep Klingenschmitt in the spotlight as the face of the Republican party. But Lois Fornander can not carry out the campaign on her own and not without some money. Because the demographics are so challenging for a Democrat in that district, the money is not going to flow in from the PACs–nor from the party. But support for Lois Fornander will benefit all Democrats in the state by showing that Klingenschmitt really is representative of the Republican party (at least a significant portion of it) and by forcing them to divert resources to respond.
You can help the cause against all the Klingenschmitts by throwing a little support to Lois. http://www.loisfornander.org.
Klingenschmitt was the superior option in the GOP primary for HD-15 given that his opponent was Dave Williams.
Will you vote for Lois Fornander, then?
I don't vote in HD15. If were in HD15, I'd vote third party.
If I were I meant
(if no libertarian is running, not sure what I'd do. luckily, I don't have to consider that)
Where is Marilyn Marks, championing the rights of Libertarians, when we need her? El Paso casts its desperate eyes to you, MM!