U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 29, 2014 12:24 PM UTC
12 Comments
Deadlines matter, you incompetent dumbfucks. Make 'em pay.
Aw, give 'em a break, willya? They were probably having a problem finding a Republican willing to run who wasn't a White Supremacist.
. . . s/b a KNOWN White Supremacist ???
We knew what was meant. No point in being redundant.
Democrats must be awfully worried about Max Tyler to resort to stupid technicalities to thwart the democratic process. Shame on you!
Nice try, Pols, but this still stinks to high heaven. The voters will see through it.
"Stupid Technicalities", huh? Funny how you GOP guys are all about the law, unless it's not working 100% in your favor.
The only way this can hurt Democrats is if Nate Marshall endorses Max Tyler.
Program glitch? You left out "running scared".
See through what? This is politics – it's not tiddly winks. Voters will read and hear about how disorganized and incompetent the GOP is even before they get the chance to serve in government and then be reminded how GOP representatives bring loaded guns to capital building meetings about concealed carry of firemarms, only to forget they brough the gun and leave it behind in a gym bag, and they will be reminded of GOPers who don't show up to work, don't vote and when they do show up offer incoherant testimony so as to plainly show they have no interest in actually governing, only gumming up the works – ie, just like the national GOP.
"The voters will see through it……" And what do you base that statement on? Just curious; since I happen to live in District 23. I don't have any real issues with Max. He's a bit too liberal for my personal taste. But he's better than some clown who seems to be a redneck throwback to the 1950s. Don't know anything about Jane Barnes; she'll need to give me some concrete reason to vote for her.
If my party didn't follow the election rules, then it's appropriate to call "foul."
Regards, C.H.B. ( AC/DC Rules !)
I'm glad to see this court filing. Max Tyler represents his district very well, is a cool head, and able to work across the aisle.
Since the GOP screwed up twice on this nomination, they should have to pay the political price (not to be listed on the ballot) and learn the lesson for next time.
The Jeffco GOP should not be let off that lightly. Ed Ramey should have requested that Nate Marshall's name be restored to the ballot as the GOP candidate in HD 23. I'm guessing he supports the Second Amendment, TABOR and personhood. And he's probably opposed to immigration reform…..