President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 25, 2014 02:33 PM UTC

Another Day, Another Massive Protest In Jefferson County

  • 26 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

thursdayprotests
Photo via Twitter

The Denver Post's Jesse Paul reports, the student protests in Jefferson County over the new conservative school board majority's proposal to "review" new AP history curriculum raged again Thursday:

Nearly one thousand students from Columbine and Dakota Ridge high schools walked out of classes Thursday morning, punctuating the fourth straight day of Jefferson County school protests.

Students from Columbine, Lakewood, Bear Creek and Dakota Ridge high schools all walked out Thursday. It was the largest protest in what has been a week of escalating tensions between students and the school board…

Jefferson County School Board Chairman Ken Witt spoke to reporters near the Columbine protest.

"I think it's unfortunate presently to our students being used as pawns," Witt said. He also said he thought the student protests were a union tool and that students were being misled.

While Jefferson County school board conservatives defend their actions, the Post's Eric Gorski updates today on the broad range of divisive actions this new school board has taken, of which the latest "curriculum review" is the most recent example:

In the face of mass protests from students, members of the Jefferson County school board majority Wednesday defended a proposed curriculum committee and called it misunderstood, while signaling the most criticized elements are likely to be cut.

The proposed panel has emerged as the largest point of disagreement yet in the state's second-largest school district, a perennially high academic achiever that saw a conservative, reform-minded board majority voted in 10 months ago.

Like the election last November of three Republican board candidates who ran as a slate, the curriculum controversy is also an example of partisan politics playing a greater role in public education — in this case, involving a charged debate about changes in how Advanced Placement students are learning American history.

The angry denials from conservative board members in today's stories are severely undercut by the wording of the proposal. They are further undercut by fellow board member Julie Williams' stunning response to the protests, in which decries the new AP history curriculum's "emphasis on race, gender, class, ethnicity, grievance and American-bashing"–a diatribe more appropriate from fringe AM talk radio than the board of one of the state's largest and highest achieving school districts. According to Gorski's report, Williams' conservative colleagues John Newkirk and Ken Witt intend to cut the most offensive language from Williams' proposal: presumably, the stuff about how history courses should "not encourage or condone civil disorder, social strife or disregard of the law," and "present positive aspects of the United States and its heritage."

But the language in the proposal might be a sideshow to the real problem. Although Jefferson County has had curriculum reviews before, the committees involved were generally composed of education professionals and experts. This new proposal for a review of AP history simply calls for a majority vote by the school board. Since the current conservative majority took office, almost every decision made by the board has been a 3-2 party line vote. That means this committee could very easily be stacked by conservative political activists with no educational qualifications–which, incidentally, perfectly describes the new conservative majority on the Jeffco school board! And in case you're wondering if that's what the right really wants, check out this message sent from a supporter of Williams to prospective review committee members:

williamrecruitmentnote

It's as bad as it looks, folks. Defensive bluster aside, the facts back up the concerns of the protesters. Last year, a failed education funding initiative brought out legions of conservative voters to vote against it, in the process installing a school board majority in Jefferson County that is distantly to the right of the population they are entrusted to serve. Today, however, the unexpected "bonus" of Amendment 66's crushing at the polls, a far-right school board majority in Jeffco, may blow back hard on conservatives in this electoral bellwether county–doing political damage far beyond anything they had hoped to gain.

Between here and there, we expect a lot more protests.

Tweet
Share

Comments

26 thoughts on “Another Day, Another Massive Protest In Jefferson County”

  1. I really hope that Witt, Williams, and Newkirk (and their attorney) stick to their plan. Appoint the committee, stack it with tea party wackos, and gut the APUSH curriculum.  The class will no longer be available. In their bubble, they think that they have the community's support and God is on their side. Unfortunately for them most voters do not watch Fox news and do not look admiringly at the Texas School system. Witt truly believes that the union thugs are orchestrating the student walkouts. The backlash which has already started with just gain momentum, and maybe there will be enough anger and alarm for a recall.

    1. I applaud all the students who are standing against dumbing history down. It makes me seriously proud as an American, and it makes me hopeful for our youth. 

      This is just as much a lesson in American civics and history as anything else, and they are living it right now.  Out of the mouths of babes…

       

      4. I applaud them and…

        We have a really hard time finding qualified people to hire. We need graduates who can think innovatively and apply scientific rigor to their work. These conservative dip-shits who want to put belief before science (creationism) and teach students that they should not question authority – they're screwing every innovative company in the country.

        So kudos to the students and I hope the anti-business members of the JeffCo school board are voted out in 2 years before they can cause too much damage to the future economic hopes of the students in their care.

    1. Well, you can consider me as one conservative that wants nothing to do with being "godly." Personally, I'm a non-theist.

      "This is the door that many of us have been praying for……..(as quoted in the article)."  When the fundamentalist tub-thumpers start to show up; and the Christian nation factors probably aren't far behind; then freedom and liberty are threatened. 

      1. You can count this as a Christian who isn't a "conservative" under the current definition of the word.  Nevertheless, I qualify for the committee since I am a Christian.  I encourage all Christian moderates and liberals to sign up for this committee.

        And by the way, congratulations to our students.  Just non-sense about civil disobedience.  Its as much a part of America as mom and apple pie and the flag and support for our troops.  These people are just like all their compatriots, they don't really believe in freedom.  They believe in enforcing their will against their fellow citizens and using the power of government to do it.

         

        The reality is that these knuckleheads have already hurt our school system.  Colleges take notice of this kind of non-sense and it makes a difference when their admissions are competitive.  Admissions officers will remember this for a long time and it will hurt our best and brightest.

         

        Finally, maybe the students should learn another lesson in history and practical politics.  How about a recall petition?  We can't stand these guys for another three years.  Throw the bums out.

        1. The United States is the emodiment of civil disobedience. What the heck does the "Tea Party" think the Tea Party was? Jesus Christ – how oxymoronic can these people get?

  6. Credit to Rebecca Klein at the Huffington Post for this 9/24/14 article "This Is The AP U.S. History Course Some Conservatives Want Dropped", including valuable links to a Practice Exam, as well as Course and Exam Description including Curriculum Framework.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/24/ap-us-history-controversy_n_5875264.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

    Would recommend careful review of the AP materials before leaping to conclusions.

    1. On whose part?

      The criticisms raised by the cons in the links here are pure rubbish.  They claim Thomas Jefferson was omitted from the curriculum.  His name isn't mentioned, but the curriculum requires:

      …a college-level U.S. history textbook, diverse primary sources, and secondary sources written by historians or scholars interpreting the past…

      and teaching…

      The colonists’ belief in the superiority of republican self-government based on the natural rights of the people found its clearest American expression in Tomas Paine’s Common Sense and in the Declaration of Independence.

      Where are you going to find a college level history text that discusses these things without mentioning Jefferson?

      The claims of these detractors collapse on the most superficial skimming of the curriculum.  They don't have to list every single American hero to create a comprehensive history course.  These people are plainly full of shit.

      1. They have made it very clear that the curriculum is not to be seen as restricted only to the things mentioned in their guidelines. Over and over. While the extemist board has enumerated multiple restrictions.

  7. Most conservatives are trying to preserve their fortune, not public morality.  Social conservatives by my guess are less than a third of all conservatives.  A far cry from the early '80s when Jerry Falwell was touting the Moral Majority.

  9. I salute our students for keeping this in the media. Here's an excerpt from nice article:

    Hundreds of students marched Thursday in the fifth day of demonstrations against the Jefferson County school board, which oversees the second-largest school district in Colorado. Protests began last Friday after members of the board called for a review of the new Advanced Placement U.S. History (APUSH) curriculum to see whether it promotes "respect for authority" or encourages "civil disorder, social strife or disregard for the law."

    By Thursday, the protests had grown to include nearly 1,000 students from Columbine, Lakewood, Bear Creek and Dakota Ridge high schools.

    "There are substantial numbers of us who want honesty and integrity in all of our classrooms, not just AP U.S. History," Maggie Ramseur, a senior at Dakota Ridge High School, told The Huffington Post. "We fear that if the school board gets the power to change the APUSH curriculum, they will have the precedent to make even more dangerous and controlling changes to our education down the road. The policies they are suggesting are ridden with political agendas, something that belongs in our curriculum about as much as religious agendas do."

    The proposal in question would create a school board committee tasked with ensuring that all U.S. history materials taught in Jefferson County would "promote citizenship, patriotism, essentials and benefits of the free enterprise system, respect for authority and respect for individual rights." The proposal also says that instructional materials "should present positive aspects of the United States and its heritage." It directs the committee to inform the board of any "objectionable materials" it might encounter.

    Nathan Woodliff-Stanley, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, said his organization is keeping a close watch on what he called an attempt to implement an "ideologically motivated" review of the district's history curriculum.

    "State-funded school [curricula] should promote academic integrity, not ideological agendas," Woodliff-Stanley said. "A committee that polices educational materials for insufficient devotion to patriotism or a lack of respect for authority runs the real danger of substituting propaganda for education."

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/25/conservative-ap-history_n_5883224.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

  10. If the Senate race comes down to a few thousand votes or less, and it just may, and Udall wins, is he going to thank Williams? She is a real asset to the Dems right now.

  11. So interesting and curious that our resident RWNJ trolls, so big of mouth typically, remain so conspicuously absent from these JeffCo School Board threads….

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

131 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!