U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez
(D) George Stern
(R) Sheri Davis
50%↑
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
June 11, 2008 04:25 PM UTC
6 Comments
I say neither. Along with franking, this has to be the biggest non-issue of the day.
Voters I know are talking about gas prices, energy, economy, immigration, war -you know, important things. I don’t know of anyone who is voting on the almighty franking/earmarks issue
Schaffer is making earmarks a centerpiece of his campaign. You don’t think that’s approach is sound?
Hate to say it, but Shaffer’s not doing so hot. These sort of issues always strike me as “inside baseball”. I think the main issue for voters this season is energy (gas) prices. But that’s just me.
Earmarks is 10 times more important than Franking.
But its still No big Problem for Lamborn.
WHY?
Cause theres no there, there.
Lamborn is squeeky clean on the earmarks and campaign contribution issues. He has been on the right side of fiscal dicipline, before it was the issue du jour.
As I argued in this diary, the Post’s (and now Crank’s) contention that Lamborn’s measly take from defense PACs are somehow tied to his earmarks is absurd.
But you do realize, Newsman, that fiscal discipline has been an issue du jour since long before Lamborn won election to Congress, don’t you?
Republicans campaigning against “earmarks” is relatively recent, raised to neutralize scandalous earmarks inserted by embattled Republican lawmakers under investigation for the practice.
Not really.
Not with everyone.
Not with Liberals cira 1929-1999.
Not with most “moderates”
With me, yes.
Reagan, Goldwater, Yes.
With Jeffords, Snow, and other Rockefeller Republicans, NO, Not Really.