HOUSE DISTRICT 15
VOTERS SEE TWO SIDES TO BRUCE
“This election is only about Doug Bruce. The only characteristic his opponent has is: ‘I’m not Doug Bruce,'” Loevy said.
DENVER Maria Miles thinks Rep. Douglas Bruce is “really rude and arrogant.”
She can’t understand why the midterm appointee to the state Legislature refused to be sworn in until days after the session began in January.
But she still plans to vote for him in the House District 15 Republican primary Aug. 12.
Many of the 24,300 registered Republicans in Bruce’s northeastern Colorado Springs district share Miles’ love-hate relationship with their state representative.
In his first election run for the seat, Bruce faces a primary battle with political newcomer Mark Waller, who wrested the top ballot line from Bruce at the El Paso County GOP assembly in March.
That he even has a Republican opponent is partly because of Bruce’s string of run-ins during his four months at the state Capitol:
Before taking his seat as now Sen. Bill Cadman’s replacement, Bruce angered legislative leaders by delaying his swearingin so he’d be eligible to run for more terms under the state’s term limits restrictions.
Bruce demanded that he be sworn in before the full House of Representatives and allowed to make a speech.
After that demand was rejected, Bruce became the first state lawmaker to be censured, for kicking a newspaper photographer who took his picture while Bruce’s head was bowed in prayer on the House floor before his private swearing-in.
Next, Bruce lost his seat on the House committee dealing with veterans issues for refusing to sponsor or vote on the annual resolution honoring service members and vets. As an El Paso County commissioner, Bruce had refused to vote on ceremonial resolutions, calling them a waste of time.
In the waning days of the legislative session in which none of Bruce’s proposals came close to passing, Bruce was silenced after referring to farm workers from Mexico as “illiterate peasants,” and was accused of sexual harassment.
Bruce remained unrepentant throughout, causing some residents of his district to predict his ouster in November.
Elsewhere in Colorado, that might be a foregone conclusion, but in Colorado Springs, Bruce enjoys a special cachet.
That’s because of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, the tax and spending limitations on governments in the state constitution that Bruce authored.
Seventeen years after voters gave Bruce his victory over what he considered rampant government waste, TABOR continues to give Bruce an appeal that, for some, overrides his often caustic personality.
That’s exemplified by Bruce’s peasants remark, which shocked and alienated all but a few House colleagues.
In his district, his supporters admitted his choice of words was poor, but even his opponents conceded he was attempting to address the problem of illegal immigration.
Far from being offended, Marnie Ellis said she and her husband, Scott, laughed when they heard the quote, rolled their eyes and said: “There’s Doug doing his stuff.”
Harold Bledsoe couldn’t recall specifics about what Bruce did during the 2008 legislative session, but referred to him as an “excellent representative,” saying he works for lower taxes.
Bruce’s admirers blame a biased media and Republican leaders afraid of change for his clashes in Denver.
Mike Van Horn said that with Democrats in control of the House and Senate in the state Legislature, the only way for Bruce to be heard was to be controversial.
Carole Carpenter, one of about two dozen longtime District 15 Republican voters interviewed last week, said she appreciates Bruce’s bluntness.
“Sometimes we need a renegade to make people think,” she said.
Other longtime supporters, though, say Bruce has crossed the line in the past year, calling him a “disgrace” and a “fool,” and describing his representation of their district as a “disaster.”
Jerry Habener, who supported Bruce in 2004 when he was elected to the county commission, said Bruce has made people “ashamed to be associated with him and his party.”
Stanley Whonic said it was embarrassing when Bruce kicked the photographer and that he no longer could separate what Bruce stands for and how he acts.
“I probably would vote against him if I sat down and looked around at all the candidates and found one . . . who is more politically astute and not such a clown,” said Whonic.
Waller won the top line on the primary ballot by convincing assembly delegates that he is fiscally and socially conservative, and, unlike Bruce, knows how to work with other lawmakers to get things done.
But he lacks Bruce’s name recognition – threefourths of the Republicans interviewed had never heard of Waller.
Bob Loevy, Colorado College political science professor, said that may not matter in the primary.
“This election is only about Doug Bruce. The only characteristic his opponent has is: ‘I’m not Doug Bruce,'” Loevy said.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Colorado Republicans Bearhug J.D. Vance, Warts And All
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Colorado Republicans Bearhug J.D. Vance, Warts And All
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Colorado Republicans Bearhug J.D. Vance, Warts And All
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Colorado Republicans Bearhug J.D. Vance, Warts And All
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Boebert Wants to Fix Secret Service by…Not Paying Them?
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Colorado Republicans Bearhug J.D. Vance, Warts And All
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Well, Lookie Here: Gabe-ish Evans Takes Salary from Own Congressional Campaign
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Hurd, Evans Play Amnesia Games On Anti-Abortion Votes
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
It will be interesting to see how the votes in his district go. As a Democrat I hope he wins. As a supporter of an effective and productive bi-partisian legislature, I hope he loses.
My knee-jerk reaction ot him as an elected official has always been: “if they are stupid enough to elect this jackass, they deserve him.”
But now that he is in a state position, his voters are forcing him on the rest of us, and we do not deserve that.
This race will be very interesting to watch. If he does win the primary, I am wondering how many GOP voters will “cross the aisle” for this one race, or simply not vote on it at all.
Just in case you are wondering, there’s the voter break down for the district:
Total voter Registration (these numbers are all as of the beginning of the year):
Rep 24039 48%
Dem 9340 19%
Other 16431 33%
Active voters:
Rep 17032 52%
Dem 6083 19%
Other 9338 29%
In my precinct, it is even more Republican than those you posted for all of HD-15.
That should be the only characteristic that matters. But he does live in La La land, so it might not be enough.
Donated some cash to Dougie. He’s the best thing that could happen to the Democratic party in the house.
Last I heard, Doug Bruce does not take campaign contributions from anyone.
He may be the only politician in the Colorado State house in the last 30 years that can make that claim.
He literally is beholding to NO interests, Special or otherwise.
Doug Bruce is the poster child for what it would look like if you really took all the money out of politics.
Like what you see?
(He says as he climbs on his soapbox)
I believe the only sane move at this point is to get the government out of legislating politics.
McCain Fiengold is a great example of good intentions gone bad.
Lets just require full disclosure on any contribution over $100.00, and take all artificial limits off. The 527’s might not disappear, but they would be short a lot of cash that could go directly to the party or the candidate.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled program “The Liberal World” joined in progress.
I would like to see public matching funds too for donations up to say $250.00/contributor.
What the —- !
Why not just make the first $250.00 per candidate or $1000.00 total deductible? Either one is just as bad as the other.
Why are you willing to take tax dollars confiscated by the threat of force from American Citizens, and give them to someone running for a political office.
Sorry Dave. I say Heck NO !
People that can’t afford to give $ to a political candidate can give them the other thing they need, their vote.
It worked for over 150 years.
So long as any contribution over $100.00 per election per candidate has a mandatory public reporting requirement, public opinion will take care of those that take big money from George Sorros or (Insert name of scary right wing contributor here).
Either we pay directly through taxes, or they are beholden to large doners and pass laws that give those donors an advantage, which tends to cost us more.
Taxes to pay for campaigns save us money.
I am definitely the dissenting voice of my party on this one, but I agree 100% with this sentiment.
(borrowing the soapbox): Politicians are going to be bought in some form or fashion. Even the ones who go to great lengths to show they are not end up beholden to the “anti-lobbyist lobby”. And I’m okay with that, I just want to know who bought them so I know if I can trust them on certain issues.
Full disclosure would have to be a must. As would severe punishment for those who try to hide who owns them.