President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 29, 2014 12:35 PM UTC
10 Comments
Quinnipiac should get in touch with this pollser who says Udall is blowing out Gardner with the hispanic voters:
The Strategies 360 poll puts Udall at 45 percent and Gardner at 44 percent. The poll by the consulting group, which has a Denver office, was not commissioned by any outside group. ... Among Hispanic voters surveyed, Udall leads Gardner 58-26. Hispanic voters
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/colorado-senate-race-strategies-360
Party's over Cory, be sure to turn out the lights when you leave.
Quinnipiac apparently is bucking for the "Biggest Crap Pollster of 2014" award, particularly where Iowa and Colorado are concerned.
Hey, you can't have Rasmussen, Suffolk and foXX nooZe willing all the pro-GOTP glory! Save some for somebody else!
(And yes, I know Rass has improved a bit this cycle, but prior to now it was "all GOTP all the time, baby!" by ridiculously wide, fraudulent margins.)
I think even the Faux polls are more reliable than Q's.
What's with the overblown cliche-riddled statement from Tim Malloy? Do polling firms typically hype their released in such fevered terms?
He sounds like he's on commission to sell subscriptions.
He should be extremely embarrassed, due to both his breathlessly juvenile writing, and his shameless pro-Pug Party bias.
The underlying message appears to be: "Need a reliably pro-GOP, narrative-driving poll performed? I'm your daddy."
Given that QP is a university polling center, not a private for profit polling outfit, I have no freaking idea. QP does have this interesting trend in their polls:
TREND: Is your opinion of John Hickenlooper favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
LIKELY VOTERS......... Oct 23 Oct 15 Sep 17 2014 2014 2014 Favorable 51 48 43 Unfavorable 42 44 51 Hvn't hrd enough 4 6 5 REFUSED 2 2 1TREND: Is your opinion of Bob Beauprez favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
LIKELY VOTERS......... Oct 23 Oct 15 Sep 17 2014 2014 2014 Favorable 45 45 49 Unfavorable 39 36 31 Hvn't hrd enough 12 17 19 REFUSED 3 2 1Hicks feel good, no attack campaign wins again as voters like him the more they see him! Not good news for former Congressman Beauprez as his favorables are falling
Not Q-pac's fault that millions of stoner voters in Colorado are futzing up their scientific and proven polling methods and models . . . Dope, dopes, and mail-in ballots — it's a heretofore never experienced polling nightmare.
Make up your minds people, light up afterwords!
Never trust an academic outfit that doesn't release full polling data.
It's just embarrassing for them to release all these polls that are all over the map one after another, especially with the cheesy commentary. I don't understand it, and I seriously doubt Quinnipiac is going to look good on the other side.