Back in late October, we asked you for suggestions for the Best and Worst political ads in Colorado this cycle. We took your suggestions and combed through YouTube searching for more candidates for Best and Worst political ads of 2014, and we've come up with finalists in both categories. We'll put the finalists to a vote to see which TV ads Colorado Pols readers think stood out the most this year.
Click here for Colorado's BEST Political Ads in 2014.
Click here for Colorado's WORST Political Ads in 2014.
How do we distinguish a "Good" advertisement from a "Bad" ad? There are a lot of different approaches for this kind of thing, but we decided to keep it simple and visceral. Our criteria:
► INSTANT IMPRESSION: A good political ad should stand out immediately in your mind — if you need to watch a particular ad a dozen times to make your decision, then it wasn't that good, and it certainly wasn't memorable.
► PRODUCTION VALUE: Does the ad look like a 6th-grader made it with cheap movie-editing software? On the other hand, does the ad look over-produced and too melodramatic?
► MESSAGING: Is the ad clear about the candidate or issue it hopes to influence? Is it easy to understand without trying to cram too many talking points into 30 seconds?
► IMPACT: Rarely is one political ad responsible for determining the outcome in a particular race, and we didn't want to limit the discussion to candidates and campaigns that were victorious on Election Night. The Secretary of State race is a good example here; Democrat Joe Neguse was responsible for our favorite ad of the cycle, while Republican Wayne Williams (the winner in the SOS race) starred in some truly terrible spots. In this category, we also consider any negative effects from the ad in question — did the ad backfire and end up harming the candidate or issue it was designed to promote? Finally, we judge impact based on how we think the ad influenced an average voter; if a voter knew nothing else about the candidate or issue, would this ad be enough to get that voter leaning in the right direction?
► ONCE, TWICE, THRICE: We look at each ad three times, using the time-honored tactic of watching once with the sound off and once without looking at the screen (for an audible-only impression). This can be a critical test for a TV ad, and you can always tell when somebody got sloppy and didn't run through the proper tests before they released the spot to the networks. Going through this process is intended to help catch any potential problems before the ad was finalized. For example, Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez's infamous 2006 ad, which features the candidate standing next to the rear end of a horse, looks a lot different when you turn off the sound. To anyone watching the Beauprez ad at home without being able to hear the full audio, the visual takeaway is: Bob Beauprez = A Horse's Ass. Certainly not what they intended.
Follow the link below to view our list of the BEST and WORST political ads of the 2014 cycle:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Stanistan
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Way too inside baseball, you guys. When you get wiped out you don't analyze the tv ads.
Inside baseball is kind of what we do at Colorado Pols
I'd say Udall's entire ad campaign wins for the worst. Clips from the adorable video of him reaching the summit of another 14er, grinning ear to ear like a happy kid should have been included in ads highlighting what he's done to conserve our state's lands to be enjoyed by revenue producing tourists, leaf viewers, campers, hikers, climbers, rafters, hunters, fishermen, etc. as well as how he has supported Colorado victims of fires and floods and how he supports new green energy economic initiatives that would create permanent jobs The stern choice ads should have been just one part of the mix.
For worst single ad I nominate the tone deaf Romanoff ad calling for a federal balanced budget amendment as if that was on any potential Romanoff voter's list of priorities in 2014.
Agreed, but somehow none of Udall's ads made the cut of worst ads.
Makes sense. No single ad was terrible. It was a collective thing. If this was for worst over all ad campaign Udall's would be the hands down winner. For single I'm going with Romanoff's conservative austerity is just what we need now ad. He may as well have said… remember when I pretended to be some kind of "progressive" super hero in my spite match against Bennet? Yeah, that was pure bull alright.