Just when you thought it was safe to exhale as the end of the 2015 session of the Colorado legislature approaches today, fresh controversy is brewing at the Capitol over House Bill 15-1390: a bill that sped through the House yesterday before passing the Senate today to allow lenders to dramatically increase interest rates charged for specific types of personal loans. Passed with almost no notice or debate, the Bell Policy Center is urgently sounding the alarm–from their release yesterday before the bill passed the Senate this morning:
A late bill that is clearly bad for consumers easily passed the House and is on the Senate floor. This bill, Allowable Finance Charge for Certain Consumer Credit Transactions (HB15-1390), would raise the cost of credit for moderate- and low-income Coloradans on certain consumer credit transactions. The frenzied pace of the final days of the legislative session paved the way for this bill to sail through, and consumers stand to lose. [Pols emphasis]
The bill passed the House (62-2) last week and the Senate Finance Committee (4-1) this morning, despite strong testimony in both chambers from our Rich Jones. Jones said that raising the caps on certain supervised loans and consumer credit sales would lead to more high-cost and unaffordable credit products. We are not opposed to the loans, just to increasing the current rates.
The Colorado Attorney General’s Office, which regulates these loans, testified in the House about how HB15-1390 would affect these loans. While neutral on the bill, the office said that it would increase the costs of an average $6,000 loan by 38.1 percent. In response to a question, the Attorney General’s Office also said there is nothing to indicate that this credit product is not available to consumers or that consumers are having a hard time accessing this product. [Pols emphasis]
In a legislative session that was supposed to be about the middle class, this bill moves Colorado in the wrong direction. We wish this bill had come up earlier in the session to allow more time for conversations with legislators…
But the extremely limited debate this bill received appears to have been a feature, not a bug. The legislation has its origin with lobbyists for OneMain Financial, a branch of Citigroup that specializes in the kinds of personal loans that would be affected. The bill was rushed through the House with almost no opposition, but the vote today in the Senate was not unanimous after Democratic Senators realized there was a problem. There seems to be an effort now that the bill is causing controversy to make excuses for its plain effect–allowing lenders to hike interest rates on personal loans. Unfortunately, it’s a one-page bill, and there’s no sugar-coating what it does.
Much like the shenanigans we’ve seen in previous years to undo hard-won reforms of the payday lending industry, what we’re seeing here is another ugly brute-force attempt by lobbyists and allied politicians to ram through an undesirable piece of legislation during the final crush. Longtime readers will recall that the payday loan reform battle was fraught with lobbyist-engineered treachery, with several attempts before success in 2010 scuttled by Democrats making “surprise” votes to kill the bills. Sen. Cheri Jahn, the Senate sponsor of House Bill 15-1390, has a long history of this kind of thing, and has little trust among consumer advocates as a result.
Bottom line: lender lobbyists are some of the most audacious under the Dome, but this bill could well be a step too far–for them, and for legislators in both parties who signed on to this ill-advised ploy. There is simply no reason to ram through legislation like this except to gouge consumers and enrich lenders. And the only reason to ram it through at the last minute is to keep it quiet.
In short, it’s one of those situations that makes voters, you know, cynical. Hopefully, Gov. John Hickenlooper will correct what appears to be a major bipartisan mistake.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Hick Smacks Down Even More Straight-Up Lying From Amendment 80 Campaign
BY: cgrandits
IN: Here’s What YOU Think is Happening in Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races
BY: joe_burly
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Just a reminder to my Democratic friends. This ran in a Democratic-majority House, with Democratic sponsors, and almost total Democratic support. I know so many of us think, "better a corporatist D, than an R," but this is what comes of it.
In some ways, the Republicans seem more honest. At least they let you know that, if you're poor, you're screwed. Giving help with one hand while picking someone's pocket with the other, though…
This is why a lot of people held their nose while supporting Jahn last year. Better than the alternative, but she's a snake in the grass. I agree that this was a huge mistake for every Dem who got suckered into voting yes, but Jahn didn't get suckered.
We need more Democrats AND better Democrats.
I will have to admit that for the first time since I started voting in the early 70's, I did not vote for any candidate for an office – I refused to vote for Jahn so I left that portion of the ballot blank.
You can decry the POS "lender lobbyists" all you want, but the last minute screwing passed Dickey Lee's House 62-2!?! Fuck 'em all, including the 'Hick that'll likely sign this screwing ("It had overwhelming bipartisan support in the legislature . . . ").
Please go home!!!
Bernie Sanders is right. I'm beginning to think his grass roots campaign might work. I just saw an article that he has raised 3 million dollars in the last 4 days.
Is there anyone in the Colorado legislature that doesn't know that last minute late bills are 99.983% of the time someone sneaking something ugly under the radar??? . . .
. . . And still, they vote "yea" and hope that no one notices???
That's assuming that they don't actively want to vote "yea" and hope that no one notices.
I stand corrected.
People are noticing. This was a biiiiig mistake.
I hope you're right, but I don't believe you are. My guess is–
same folks run next time
same folks get elected
poor folks stay in debt
bills keep coming late
Burma-Shave
Isn't Cheri Jahn the mouth piece for CACI? Talk about a DINO!
See what a "big tent" get you.