President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 29, 2008 04:21 PM UTC

Mark Udall Shines On Invesco Stage; Ritter, Not So Much

  • 19 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

In addition to being Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s epic moment, the final day of the Democratic National Convention at Invesco Field gave Senate candidate Mark Udall his biggest audience yet. And he didn’t disappoint, as the Denver Post reports:

Rep. Mark Udall challenged the Democratic National Convention crowd Thursday, reminding them that it is their responsibility to change government for the better.

That charge, originally delivered 30 years ago by Arizona Rep. Mo Udall, still rings true today, his son said in a prime-time speech from the Invesco Field podium. Udall, of Eldorado Springs, is seeking the Senate seat of retiring Sen. Wayne Allard.

“In the spirit of the West, we can move forward, but it’s going to take leaders who are strong enough to stand up for what’s right, bold enough to bring new ideas and sweep away the worst of Washington’s old ways,” Udall said as supporters blanketed the front section of Invesco Field at Mile High with signs and the Colorado delegation cheered.

Wearing a bolo tie to pay homage to his father, Udall praised Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and running mate Joe Biden as the leaders ready to rush in a new direction for the country.

“This is our time,” Udall said. “This is our moment to change the course of history.”

The appearance by Udall will help his visibility, which he will need to fight Republican Bob Schaffer, said Norman Ornstein, political analyst with the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank.

“It’s going to be very good for Udall for fundraising,” Ornstein said. “He’s got a lot of people who regularly give money to Democratic candidates.” [Pols emphasis]

…Schaffer’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment Thursday night.

While Udall shined, Governor Bill Ritter was a dud. Ritter had a hoarse voice which hurt his delivery, but his voice wasn’t the problem – the speech may have been the most dull and uninspiring of any given last night, which was inexcusable given the setting. Ritter sounded as though he just gave a stump speech from his campaign. They really couldn’t come up with anything better?

Maybe the Ritter camp spent a lot of effort and time on the speech, but it sure didn’t sound like it. To have been given such a big stage to shine as the host Governor, Ritter lost a great chance to impress the pundits and the chattering class and raise his own profile. What a missed opportunity, and an embarrassing one at that.

Comments

19 thoughts on “Mark Udall Shines On Invesco Stage; Ritter, Not So Much

  1. Bill Ritter was the worst

    Diana DeGette was the second worst and Mark Udall was not a whole lot better.  Ed Perlmutter and John Salazar both gave far better speeches than either Ritter, DeGette or Udall.

    As with other opportunities Udall squandered this one with a flat speech filled with cliches to a crowd that was bored.

    1. Diana DeGette’s voice is really grating. It’s too high-pitched and it makes her sound like a little girl. She needs voice lessons so she can learn to mature the sound of her voice.

      Bill Ritter was obviously losing his voice and that has as much of an impact on how he’s perceived as DeGette’s girly voice.

      Of course, none of that should affect the message, but it does.

      1. Reading a speech without a voice can be very different from hearing the same words.

        Yes, DeGette would get further on the floor of the House probably if she had voice coaching. Heck, Hitler did it!

        One reason Al Gore is such a forceful, effective speaker is his voice. Women are at a natural disadvantage, but Hillary has overcome that.  

        I’m  a sucker for good voices, politically and with women (that used to be) in my life.  

  2. Ritter is now O fer 2, he was also terrible on Meet the Press.  You have to seriously be slacking to be outdone by a gruff Wyoming Governor.

    Good guy?  Probably.  Good speaker?  Not at all.

  3. He’s always hoarse or losing his voice when he speaks in public. His state of the state address this year was the same.

    I like Bill’s ideas, and his policies, but I wouldn’t put him in front of a microphone at a large public event any time in the near future.

  4. Andrea Mitchell, Stephen Colbert, Bill Ritter… Maybe something’s going around at the parties.

    (And yes, I know Colbert just has a Denver backdrop, but still, maybe it’s got Denver germs on it.)  

      1. I can’t show you proof, but I was sitting behind the stage in Sec 124.

        About halfway into Ritter’s speech the teleprompter went berserk. It scrolled rapidly and had nothing but gibberish. When they finally got it to settle down, they had Perlmutter’s speech up.

        Ritter did an amazing job staying calm given this (still, it wasn’t his best performance).

        1. be related to the teleprompter troubles. If it’s true that it went schizoid, then I’d say Ritter did great, and it’s not surprising if it went a little flat. I don’t care who you are, talking to 50,000+ people is a nerve-wracking experience. Only Bill Clinton and Barack Obama could have pulled off a speech that was just as good if not better than with a teleprompter.

          I would probably have run of the stage crying like a baby, or possible passed out and ended up a quivering mass on the floor as the paramedics ran up with smelling salts.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

74 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!