UPDATE: 9NEWS Brandon Rittiman reporting, Cynthia Coffman sticks to her story about the timing of her decision not to run for the U.S. Senate:
Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman confirmed to 9NEWS Thursday she will not run for US Senate, saying it’s a decision she made before this week’s news of her participation in an attempt to oust the new state GOP chairman.
“I have said it repeatedly to anyone who will listen,” Coffman said in an email to 9NEWS. “The party knows it; I told the chair many weeks ago.”
As further evidence that the decision was made prior to this week’s public ruckus over party leadership, Coffman said she informed another Colorado media outlet of her political plans before the dust-up occurred.
Bottom line: it’s certainly possible that Mrs. Coffman told a few reporters or fellow GOP insiders that she wouldn’t run for the U.S. Senate next year–but it really doesn’t matter that much. If Coffman wants to tell the world how no, she really did decide not to run before she started blackmailing people, she’s free to do so. That won’t change the perceptions, and if anything could drive more attention to the story.
Regardless of the timing of Mrs. Coffman’s decision, there’s an easy reason she felt the need to go public about the Senate race today: the same reason she is getting national press right now to begin with. And it’s not a reason that makes her, or fellow Colorado Republicans, look in any way good. Original post follows.
—–
We can’t call it a surprise after the disastrous week Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman has had in the wake of nationally publicized allegations that she participated in the alleged attempted blackmail of Colorado GOP chairman Steve House, but as National Review’s Alexis Levinson reports:
Colorado attorney general Cynthia Coffman will not run in the state’s upcoming Senate race, she tells National Review.
“I’m not running,” she said. “I thought about it for half a minute. I like being in Colorado, and I love my job. This is where I want to be.”
Cynthia Coffman made headlines earlier this week for her role in what has been described as an attempted coup against the Colorado GOP leadership. The chairman of the party, Steve House, has said that Coffman called a meeting with him where she and two other Colorado Republicans asked him to resign. House has alleged they threatened to publicly accuse him of having an extramarital affair if he did not do so. Coffman, in a statement released Wednesday evening, denied making any such threats. House ultimately declined to resign.
Colorado Republicans say Coffman’s prominent role in what has become a messy, public dispute could damage her political future… [Pols emphasis]
In today’s story, Cynthia Coffman claims to have reached this decision before the scandal over the attempted shakedown of House dominated local political headlines this week, but that’s not consistent with what we were hearing as recently as Monday. Chatter among Republicans in the last couple of weeks about a Cynthia Coffman run for the U.S. Senate was much too widespread to be accidental, and ramped up right after state Sen. Ellen Roberts faceplanted in the national media explaining her shifting views on reproductive choice. Another possible 2016 Senate candidate, Arapahoe County DA George Brauchler, committed a major social media gaffe earlier this month that helped create space for Mrs. Coffman to get in the race.
As of today? Back to the drawing board, Colorado Republicans. Cynthia Coffman’s brief time in the limelight is over.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Air Slash
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: QuBase
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: QuBase
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: allyncooper
IN: President Jimmy Carter, 1924-2024
BY: Michelle Foust
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
When I saw this thread, I first thought it was a joke. The bigger question. Is whether she’ll hang in there as AG.
Clearing the field for Tanc. In the eyes of the base, he's perfect.
And in other news, Bristol Palin now claims she always meant to get pregnant outside of marriage.
/sarcasm
Bristol is pregnant?? Wow, that ranks up there with the latest Kardashian news
/my sarcasm
Yeah, Tanc for Senate. Will he run again on, what was it, the American Constitution party ticket?
FYI, the "other media outlet" was Lynn Bartels, who waited until today to mention it b/c Cynthia Coffman is on her nice list. Fourth estate in this town just sucks.
Being on Bartels' nice list does not get you a pass from Bartels
I'm not sure I get how being in receipt of an email makes somebody to blame for something. Let's save our barbs for the right targets, eh?
She hinted at it (not running) with me more than two weeks ago, through her assistant. And we published it.
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/153655/coffmans-departure-opens-up-colorados-u-s-senate-race
Whether or not Coffman had already decided not to seek the seat, it was likely pressure coming from this latest fiasco that forced her to go fully public with the decision.
So the defense of Coffman et. al. is that they met with House, pointed out all the nasty things that were being said and would be said about him if he didn't resign, and demanded that he resign–but they didn't "threaten" him?
No threat! No blackmail! Nothing to see here!
I am not a Cynthia Coffman fan, but cut it out with the "Mrs. Coffman" shit. The proper honorific for the Attorney General is General. If you want to distinguish her from her husband, call her General Coffman.
And the General outranks Major Mike……..ohhhhh that must hurt.
Indeed….
Actually, no. The term "Attorney General" derives from the French "avocat general" (sorry don't have the proper characters on my tablet) which explains why the adjective follows the noun. So, in normative English the title would be "General Attorney." The word "general" does not signify rank but the fact that the duties of the office are broad rather than specialized.
Yep.
Per Wikipedia, the proper form of address is Mr./Madam Attorney General and the short version is General X, and it is common among state attorneys general (not so much the U.S. AG but occasionally even then) to use the honorific "General." I've been in meetings with four Colorado AGs and everybody called them General. It sounds goofy to me, but it is the accepted form of address.