U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 13, 2015 02:02 PM UTC
16 Comments
Never been a fund like the Foundation Eva Peron……
We have the best government that money can buy.
– Mark Twain
Well at least Bennet is the worst we'll do. Doubt any of the C and D lister Rs contemplating a run against him are going to be funded to compete. The lion's share of the smart R money from the big PACs and donors will go elsewhere. And remember, boys and girls…. any 21st century Dem is better than any 21st century R. Bennet votes very nicely on lots of things. The Rs vote nicely on next to nothing. Taking back the Senate would be really nice, too.
If you can't take their money and drink their booze, and then vote against them, you don't belong in this business.
– Arnold Vinick
I guess, then you're saying that since he can't vote against them . . . ??
Unfortunately, Bennet thought that referred to DPS taxpayers.
Wonder if he matches Bernie for number of donors for those dollars?
Not really although it would be interesting to see how skewed it is.
Bernie was in Martha's Vineyard this past weekend brushing elbows with the rich and famous, and hoping to pick up some donations. To which I say…..good for him!
and we know why…don't we?
I think that if I were one of the servers at the Bennet punch bowl, I would probably do everything I could to avoid invoking any mental images of my candidate sitting on $4.3 million . . .
. . . but, he'll, that's just me!
If they ever do a movie of Senator Bennet's time in Congress, I've got a suggestion for a great title – The Whore of Wall Street.
It will have to have a very large cast. He no more or less fits the bill than practically every other Dem pol.
we know what money can't buy. hope he's picked up on that as well and pulls a Willie Brown on someone:
Pretty sure Bennet was going to vote for fast track anyway so they could have saved themselves some dough.
That's just your "little people" thinking. As Fitzgerald noted, the rich are different than you and me. It isn't the giving — $53,700 probably isn't enough to finance the gilding on these guys toilet paper holders, throw-away change. It's the accepting — that implied social contract. The receiving of one's tribute (as well as the wink-wink-nod-nod of more to come.) ("Moisten your parched beak in my bottomless reservoir of quid, guvnah' you just keeps the proper pro quoing, eh?")