U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 08, 2015 10:45 AM UTC

Morgan Carroll Rips Coffman's NRCC Soul-Selling

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Rep. Mike Coffman (R), Sen. Morgan Carroll (D).
Rep. Mike Coffman (R), Sen. Morgan Carroll (D).

The Colorado Statesman’s Vic Vela follows up on last week’s Washington Post exclusive, detailing an agreement signed by embattled incumbent Rep. Mike Coffman and other vulnerable members of Congress with the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) to provide, among other things, his “legislative strategy” in writing in order to receive support for his race from national GOP donors.

As you might have expected, Democratic CD-6 challenger Morgan Carroll finds that more than a little unseemly:

Democratic state Sen. Morgan Carroll, D-Aurora, who is seeking to replace Coffman as the 6th Congressional District representative next year, blasted Coffman for signing the contract.

Carroll sees the contract as a way for party insiders to dictate campaign and policy decisions of candidates who are lured by campaign cash and who are beholden to the NRCC because of it.

“What is disturbing to me about this is basically it’s getting people to give up their legislative responsibility and their autonomy over their own vote in exchange for cash,” she said…

"Hey! That's not a story."
“Meh! That’s not a story.”

Whenever a bit of embarrassing political insider-y detail like this NRCC’s “Patriot Program” contract leaks its way out of the Beltway press and into armchair quarterback discussions back home, there’s an immediate tendency by political observers–especially Democrats–to pooh-pooh said revelations as “business as usual.” After all, surely everybody must do this, so it can’t be a that big of a deal. Right? Even experienced political operatives can complacently talk themselves right out of a perfectly salient line of attack this way.

It’s important, however keen a political observer you may fancy yourself to be, to not do that.

[NRCC spokesman Zach] Hunter said the party’s request that participants share their legislative agenda “is for informational purposes only.” It’s an effort for the party to understand what the candidates “feel their priorities are for their district.”

Hunter was unable to answer what the required “political justification” of a member’s legislative goals means.

“I don’t have a comment specifically on explaining that term,” he said…

DCCC national press secretary Meredith Kelly said financial support programs for Democratic candidates do not require what is spelled out in the Patriot Program contract. [Pols emphasis]

“The DCCC works with incumbents to make sure they are running smart campaigns as effectively as possible, but would never require submission and approval of a legislative agenda — especially not in exchange for financial and political support,” Kelly said in an emailed statement.

You see, folks, for all the jaded presumptions we saw last week that having one’s legislative agenda pre-approved in exchange for support is business as usual for both parties, it’s actually not. There is a difference between the way Democrats and Republicans support lawmakers, and in turn expect lawmakers to support the national party’s agenda. There is something unseemly about expecting a lawmaker to get his legislative agenda pre-approved to receive support, especially for Mike Coffman who is banking on an “independent” image for survival in a politically swing district. That’s why this story made the Washington Post to begin with.

And if local Democrats would like to actually unseat Coffman in 2016, they might consider letting him defend himself from these kinds of questions instead of helping him dodge them.

Tweet
Share

Comments

13 thoughts on “Morgan Carroll Rips Coffman’s NRCC Soul-Selling”

  1. Methinks the Guvs got a bit annoyed? 🙂

    BTW, I agree completely and I've said so about many other situations. We Dems are sometimes too analytical for our own good. There is no equivalent to the groupthink imposed by the GOP on their own in the Democratic Party. There never has been in my lifetime.

    "I'm not a member of an organized political party. I'm a Democrat." –Will Rogers

  2. What does the D-triple-C require?  Can we see that agreement (formal or informal is fine)?  If Coffman isn't happy with the requirements, he can turn down the money.  God knows there's enough out there.  If he is happy, I'm finding it hard to care that much.

  3. Not pooh poohing the substance and, by all means, Carroll and allies should use this as another point of attack, one of many… Just pooh poohing the idea that this kind of thing will ever have a significant influence on how people vote. So sure, go ahead and include it. Just don't anybody be dumb enough to make this particular thing the centerpiece of the campaign against Coffman. OK? That is all.

  4. The GOP loves them some litmus tests.  That's what this is about.  I'd love to see what Coffman provided to questions like this:

    1. Do you plan to introduce a bill to repeal Obamacare?

    2. Do you plan to introduce a bill to again investigate Benghazi?

    3. Do you plan to introduce a bill to support Personhood?

    4. Will you vote to shutdown the government if Planned Parenthood continues to sell baby parts for an outrageous profit?

  5. What do you expect the DCCC to say? Yes we do the same thing and Morgan Carroll is mistaken? We all know they do, that's why even Colorado Pols readers didn't buy the story when you "reported" it last week. The Colorado Statesman covering it doesn't make the story any less bogus and stupid.

  6. Mod,

    Here is the Dem litmus test.

    It is OK to kill a child until after the terrible 2s are over.  Why stop at birth after all.

    TAX, TAX and TAX some more.

    Make everyone's income equal until it is zero for everyone.

    Supply weapons directly to Hamas and Hezbollah.  No need to make Iran pay for them.  After all they are our new BFFs.

     

     

    3. Too bad for you AC.  My questions are based on actual GOP public positions.  As usual, you have to resort to making shit up.  Something you and the GOP are full of.  It must suck to be you.

        1. No problem, this is just what's called "hitting him with both barrels" 😉 

          Honestly, I will never understand why AC and his ilk come around here to offer their easily debunked nonsense.  Do they really enjoy being the toy ducks in a shooting gallery?  Other than being easy prey, they are pretty useless as a propaganda tool to sway anyone reading this site.

    4. The difference being that Davie's selections are accurate examples of Republican litmus tests as stated by the overwhelming majority of actual Republican politicians whereas none of your "liberal" examples, by which you mean Democrats, can be traced to a single actual Democratic politician. Still embarrassed over those test results? Trying to get your rightie credentials back? Pathetic, AC, you little secret RINO.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

107 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!