As the Boulder Daily Camera’s Alex Burness reported this weekend, requests to allow more University of Colorado students to attend next month’s Republican presidential debate at the Coors Events Center have fallen on deaf ears:
The Oct. 28 event in Boulder, titled “Your Money, Your Vote” and televised by CNBC, will be held in the 11,000-seat Coors Events Center on the University of Colorado campus, but the audience will be capped at about 1,000, and nearly all those chairs are already spoken for.
“One of the things people need to keep in mind,” Sean Spicer, the Republican National Committee’s chief spokesman, said Friday, “is that this is a television production more than anything else. It’s a major, major event, but it’s mostly focused on being seen by the tens of millions of people who are watching.”
…Though CU is hosting the event, the school will only squeak in a few dozen of its own.
Liberal group ProgressNow Colorado, who led calls last month for more debate tickets to go to CU students, is predictably unhappy:
“It’s outrageous that the Republican Party has chosen to shut University of Colorado students out of the October presidential debate on their own campus,” said ProgressNow Colorado executive director Amy Runyon-Harms. “The Republican Party is partnering with the University of Colorado to host this debate, co-opting the good name of Colorado’s flagship university to provide a forum for Donald Trump, Jeb Bush, and the rest of the GOP’s out-of-touch presidential candidates. Now we know that the GOP is afraid to let anyone but a hand-picked audience see them.”
“What is the Republican National Committee so afraid of that they have to lock the CU student body out of this debate?” asked Runyon-Harms. “A hand-picked audience clapping politely at the Coors Events Center while Donald Trump insults women and Ben Carson insults Muslims would be an insult to the intelligence of every University of Colorado student. The millions of viewers watching this debate deserve to see and hear how real people respond to these presidential candidates. Anything less is worthless political theater, and a misuse of the University of Colorado’s reputation for open and accessible dialogue on the issues.”
There are two ways to look at this situation. On the one hand, as the RNC claims, the debate is arguably about the televised audience, not the crowd in attendance. And the Daily Camera reports that the last two GOP presidential debates only utilized a small fraction of the available capacity of the venue they were held in. You might even go a step beyond a logistical benefit of the doubt, and say defensibly that the RNC has the “right” to invite anyone they want to “their” debate.
But is it good politics to only give out tickets to a tenth of a venue’s capacity, when thousands of CU students would gladly fill those empty seats? That’s where this gets a lot trickier for the RNC, especially with liberals making an issue of those empty seats. We don’t buy the argument that college students would necessarily be disruptive of the debate, though their reactions even within a permitted range of applause and other vocalizations might indeed be something Republicans would want to avoid. Either way, we don’t believe a full Coors Events Center would create any technical problems for the televised broadcast.
Once you get past those objections, there’s really not much left except things the RNC doesn’t want to discuss. Like why those students would be repelled by things the candidates might say.
“There’s no fee paid to reserve the venues, but the publicity value is going to be quite substantial,” [CU spox Bronson Hilliard] said. “The PR value of having the campus continually referred to, the exterior shot that will start the debate, the sustained coverage inside the venue — if you were to pay for all of that in terms of advertising value, it would be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.”
And that’s where this becomes tricky for everybody, including the University of Colorado. On the one hand, the university freely claims a six-digit PR value for hosting this debate on the CU-Boulder campus. For Republicans, hosting a debate on this historically liberal college campus has a much higher value in terms of legitimizing their field of candidates.
Once voters realize that the picturesque CU-Boulder campus is being used strictly as a backdrop, and that the students and faculty who make the place what it is are being excluded from attending the debate when they could easily be accommodated, we’d say the “PR value” drops substantially for both CU and the GOP.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Hick Smacks Down Even More Straight-Up Lying From Amendment 80 Campaign
BY: cgrandits
IN: Here’s What YOU Think is Happening in Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races
BY: joe_burly
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Batshit is easier to package when its well coreographed.
This cowardice will hurt the GOP more than a few cat-calls from students would.
It's not as if all college students are liberal either. There are plenty of Republican college students, especially business, marketing, communication related majors. They could probably get a pretty good mix if they got their campus Young Republicans working on it.
Tell me, why would liberals care who gets into this debate if not to heckle the debaters?
The true motivations at play are obvious. Shame on liberal shenanigans.
Doesn't it bother you that the only way your party's candidates can get any traction is by isolating and insulating them from anyone who disagrees with them? Are they that fragile, or do they just not have good answers to rebut their detractors? If they were my candidates, I'd be ashamed.
Shame is not a concept recognized by the GOP.
True dat, Gertie
Not sure how this "reply" has anything to do with my comment, Modster, but that's certainly nothing new.
That's the problem with trying to talk to Republicans. Like Walker's assertion that he's dropping out of the race in order to enhance his status as a leader, any statement by our resident one shot troll needs to be put through a Gibberish to English translator.
I think Spicer's reasoning makes sense – it is about the TV audience not the live attendence. But, is there money changing hands? If CU is getting paid for the use of its facilities, CU is not really in a place to dictate who can attend. Does anyone know? I presume it would be public information.
mapmaker, "Your Money, Your Vote" implies taxpayer support. CU as a venue receives taxpayer funds regardless of who is paying for this particular GOP lovefest.
This was a really bad decision that the COGOP is going to regret. Oh well, Party on.
Kind of like Rmoney holding his rally at Red Rocks?
Hey, that worked great for Bono …
They wanted to make it look like a Hillary event, 90% empty.
Well, at this point, it's not even an educational experience.