Colorado Republican Rep. Ken Buck says that he plans to vote for California Rep. Kevin McCarthy as the next Speaker of the House, which is some of the better news that we’ve seen about McCarthy in the last week.
Congressional Republicans have been less than pleased with the recent actions of McCarthy, the current House Majority Leader, particularly after his comments earlier this week that framed the Benghazi hearings as a purely political stunt aimed at harming the Presidential aspirations of Democrat Hillary Clinton. CNN has more on the blowback:
House Republicans on Wednesday sharply repudiated Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s comments that suggested the Benghazi oversight committee had succeeded by tarnishing Hillary Clinton, saying it undermined their party’s messaging on a key issue and raised questions about his ability to be the GOP’s top communicator…
…Privately, Republicans were outraged by the remarks, saying the House majority leader had given Democrats unfounded ammunition to argue that the committee’s investigation is squarely being driven by politics. Republicans on the committee had tried for months to keep the focus of the inquiry on the administration’s handling of the attacks, avoiding getting into the ins and outs of the various aspects on the email stories.
But in one fell swoop, McCarthy undercut their strategy.
In case you missed it earlier this week, Dana Milbank wrote a scathing article for the Washington Post about McCarthy’s problem using words and stuff:
Kevin McCarthy is about to ascend to the highest office in the House of Representatives and become second in line to the presidency.
But there is a problem: The speaker-apparent apparently still can’t speak.
I have been tracking the California Republican’s valiant but often unsuccessful struggles with the English language for some time now, and I was alarmed to watch him lose another round on Monday during a foreign-policy speech to the John Hay Initiative, a new outfit of the neo-conservative bent…
…In McCarthy’s Monday address, Russia’s hybrid warfare became “high-bred warfare,” and restrictions on U.S. energy shipments became “the band on America.” He spoke of the “beth path forward to safety and security”; he asserted that Syria’s regime uses chemical weapons “to the very day”; he argued that the Soviet Union collapsed “because of America’s leadership and America resolve.” And he memorably rephrased the famous question asked of Republican presidential candidates: “Would you have gone to war if you knew what you knew now?”
Maybe McCarthy just needs some more Vitamin D. Or a tanning bed.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: BREAKING: Restraining Order Stops Dave Williams Ouster Efforts Cold
BY: spaceman2021
IN: BREAKING: Restraining Order Stops Dave Williams Ouster Efforts Cold
BY: Air Slash
IN: Lauren Boebert is Now Free to be Her True Asinine Self
BY: coloradosane
IN: Lauren Boebert is Now Free to be Her True Asinine Self
BY: Air Slash
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Air Slash
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Colorado Pols
IN: Longtime Colorado Journalist Sandra Fish Retires
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
McCarthy's remarks were completely right. The lawless Obama administration has no accountability to Congress, so the court of public opinion is all we have. The Benghazi investigations have shown the American people that they can't trust Hillary. They have done the nation a great service.
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.
― George Orwell, 1984
The Benghazi investigations have shown to anyone actually paying attention to the findings instead of the rhetoric that Hillary did nothing wrong about Benghazi – that, instead, those who are baking up conspiracy theories against her have been proven to be liars, partisan witch-hunters, or at best poor sources.
A real investigation would have been over by now; it would have revealed ALL of its findings rather than burying interviews so deeply that even members of the minority on the committee didn't know about them; it would have reported any wrongdoing to the DoJ – with the appropriate public crowing if desired; it would have been scheduled in such a way as to not cost the taxpayer the maximum amount of money; it would have been a single committee rather than the at least three separate investigations so far undertaken in order to draw out the news through the election cycle.
Republicans are proving to be more cynical and abusive about the political process than I had hoped to see re-emerge in my lifetime.
They have to be.
Moderatus needs to do a better job of research. First, there were 13 documented attacks on American embassies, consulates, and staff outside of government compounds during the Bush/Cheney administration that resulted in 60 deaths. Where's the outrage about that?
Second, at least 8 other Congressional committees have investigated Benghazi and found no wrong-doing. From what I've read, the only thing Benghazi hearings has found is…….jack shit. Nothing. A gross waste of taxpayer dollars. As a fiscal conservative, I don't like to see my tax dollars wasted and more than one hearing definitely counts as waste. C.H.B.
Modster doesn't do research. He regurgitates rightie spin. And sometimes he doesn't even get that right.