President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 01, 2015 11:05 AM UTC

House Republicans Concerned About New McCarthy Era

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Rep. Ken Buck (right), with his gun.
Rep. Ken Buck, right, pictured with Rep. Trey Gowdy, whom John Boehner reportedly recruited to succeed him as Speaker.

Colorado Republican Rep. Ken Buck says that he plans to vote for California Rep. Kevin McCarthy as the next Speaker of the House, which is some of the better news that we’ve seen about McCarthy in the last week.

Congressional Republicans have been less than pleased with the recent actions of McCarthy, the current House Majority Leader, particularly after his comments earlier this week that framed the Benghazi hearings as a purely political stunt aimed at harming the Presidential aspirations of Democrat Hillary Clinton. CNN has more on the blowback:

House Republicans on Wednesday sharply repudiated Rep. Kevin McCarthy’s comments that suggested the Benghazi oversight committee had succeeded by tarnishing Hillary Clinton, saying it undermined their party’s messaging on a key issue and raised questions about his ability to be the GOP’s top communicator…

…Privately, Republicans were outraged by the remarks, saying the House majority leader had given Democrats unfounded ammunition to argue that the committee’s investigation is squarely being driven by politics. Republicans on the committee had tried for months to keep the focus of the inquiry on the administration’s handling of the attacks, avoiding getting into the ins and outs of the various aspects on the email stories.

But in one fell swoop, McCarthy undercut their strategy.

In case you missed it earlier this week, Dana Milbank wrote a scathing article for the Washington Post about McCarthy’s problem using words and stuff:

Kevin McCarthy is about to ascend to the highest office in the House of Representatives and become second in line to the presidency.

But there is a problem: The speaker-apparent apparently still can’t speak.

I have been tracking the California Republican’s valiant but often unsuccessful struggles with the English language for some time now, and I was alarmed to watch him lose another round on Monday during a foreign-policy speech to the John Hay Initiative, a new outfit of the neo-conservative bent…

…In McCarthy’s Monday address, Russia’s hybrid warfare became “high-bred warfare,” and restrictions on U.S. energy shipments became “the band on America.” He spoke of the “beth path forward to safety and security”; he asserted that Syria’s regime uses chemical weapons “to the very day”; he argued that the Soviet Union collapsed “because of America’s leadership and America resolve.” And he memorably rephrased the famous question asked of Republican presidential candidates: “Would you have gone to war if you knew what you knew now?”

Maybe McCarthy just needs some more Vitamin D. Or a tanning bed.

Comments

7 thoughts on “House Republicans Concerned About New McCarthy Era

  1. McCarthy's remarks were completely right. The lawless Obama administration has no accountability to Congress, so the court of public opinion is all we have. The Benghazi investigations have shown the American people that they can't trust Hillary. They have done the nation a great service.

    1. The Benghazi investigations have shown to anyone actually paying attention to the findings instead of the rhetoric that Hillary did nothing wrong about Benghazi – that, instead, those who are baking up conspiracy theories against her have been proven to be liars, partisan witch-hunters, or at best poor sources.

      A real investigation would have been over by now; it would have revealed ALL of its findings rather than burying interviews so deeply that even members of the minority on the committee didn't know about them; it would have reported any wrongdoing to the DoJ – with the appropriate public crowing if desired; it would have been scheduled in such a way as to not cost the taxpayer the maximum amount of money; it would have been a single committee rather than the at least three separate investigations so far undertaken in order to draw out the news through the election cycle.

      Republicans are proving to be more cynical and abusive about the political process than I had hoped to see re-emerge in my lifetime.

        1. Moderatus needs to do a better job of research. First, there were 13 documented attacks on American embassies, consulates, and staff outside of government compounds during the Bush/Cheney administration that resulted in 60 deaths. Where's the outrage about that?

          Second, at least 8 other Congressional committees have investigated Benghazi and found no wrong-doing. From what I've read, the only thing Benghazi hearings has found is…….jack shit.  Nothing. A gross waste of taxpayer dollars. As a fiscal conservative, I don't like to see my tax dollars wasted and more than one hearing definitely counts as waste.    C.H.B.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

71 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!