President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Biden*
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 21, 2008 08:22 PM UTC
13 Comments
seen the Amendment 48 truck that drives around town? I’ve seen it three times now, and it is one of the craziest looking political paraphernalia devices I’ve ever seen. I wish I had a picture.
All in the far right to off of the scale righties, as far as I can see. These endorsements will not alter one independent, middle of the road vote.
But the male endorsers better watch out, if they spill their seed they could be in big trouble.
I thought he had hopes for higher office?
The primary in 2010 for the CD4 is going to be bruatl as everyone tries to outflank each other to the right.
By the time they get to the General the will be in John Birch territory.
If I were setting up for a General election battle against Markey, I would be setting myself up as a paygo pragmatist to retake the center.
The GOP has misread the makeup of the district if they think tacking to the right will win in 2 years.
Or does it matter more that it is defeated so soundly on Nov. 4 that it never comes back in any incarnation?
is that they are far more willing than the Dems to march in lock step with each other’s bad policies. If you are an R and you like the turds on this list, then you would feel compelled vote for for 48, but wait! If you don’t want to vote for it, you could cite Schaffer. But then there is that pesky cruncher Udall!
Oh the humanity! To whom does a good Republican go to be told what to do???
is that they are far more willing than the Dems to march in lock step with each other’s bad policies. If you are an R and you like the turds on this list, then you would feel compelled vote for for 48, but wait! If you don’t want to vote for it, you could cite Schaffer. But then there is that pesky cruncher Udall!
Oh the humanity! To whom does a good Republican go to be told what to do???
he’s not on the list.
because this thing is so nutty it can be turned against them in the future as an example of impractical, unworkable, extremist politics at their worst. And it’s a wedge issue for moderate R/independent women. Even the Catholic Church doesn’t support it because it won’t withstand legal scrutiny.
As far as I can remember, that’s a first.
However, I got a robocall from Joe Whitcomb telling me to disregard a Mitchell mailing because those restraining orders were all a big mistake. I didn’t see the Mitchell mailer, but the “restraining order” call sure made me curious! I’m not sure that was a good idea, Joe.
It all seems like a crazy-ass guessing game now. I need to know which ones are close for my election night bingo/drinking game.
http://thecoloradoindex.typepa…
Amendment 48 specifically
Good luck with the games. Do you play to win, or lose?
This’ll be the first election-night party I’ve hosted. My plan is to have a bingo sheet with a bunch of close races, and every time the Democratic side wins, you get to mark it (and maybe take a drink too).
Thanks much for the link.