U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 26, 2016 03:53 PM UTC

Mike Coffman's Weak Q4 Doesn't Inspire Confidence

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Numbers are in for the all-important CD-6 race in the 4th quarter of 2015:

Rep. Mike Coffman (R), Sen. Morgan Carroll (D).
Rep. Mike Coffman (R), Sen. Morgan Carroll (D).

We can start with the obvious, incumbent GOP Rep. Mike Coffman did outraise his Democratic opponent Morgan Carroll, and has a hefty war chest in the bank. With that said, $313,000 is significantly short of objective expectations for Coffman in this race, which directly helps Carroll’s perception of viability–even though Carroll’s number isn’t really spectacular either. Carroll doesn’t need to outraise Coffman to compete in this race — not with so much third party support coming her way — and $277,000 is plenty with which to move forward.

So the question then turns back to Coffman. In Q4 of 2013, the last cycle-equivalent period, Coffman raised almost $70,000 more than he did in Q4 2015.

The numbers look worse for Coffman when you look at recent history. In Q2 2015, Coffman turned in his worst fundraising quarter in four years. In other words, Coffman has significantly underperformed in 2 out of the last 3 fundraising cycles.

There’s some excepting that can be generously made for the increasing role of outside money in congressional races, but at a certain level you just can’t spin the bottom line.

These numbers tell the story of Coffman’s continuing vulnerability.

Comments

8 thoughts on “Mike Coffman’s Weak Q4 Doesn’t Inspire Confidence

  1. Yeah, if Coffman's total doesn't inspire confidence, then Carroll's take is a dumpster fire that will have the DCCC looking to focus on other vulnerable Republicans.

    Jesus, why can't we get our shit together in CD6?  

  2. With all the money that's going to be spent on the CO-6 election, little differences like this are utterly meaningless. Past the first million spent, the returns are massively diminished. This election will come down to character, and Morgan has that in droves over Trump's peon. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

59 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!