U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 17, 2016 10:56 AM UTC

Get More Smarter on St. Patrick's Day (March 17)

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

GMS-GreenGreen beer is okay, but we’d stay away from any green foods that aren’t vegetables. It’s time to Get More Smarter with Colorado Pols. If you think we missed something important, please include the link in the comments below (here’s a good example).

TOP OF MIND TODAY…

► Senate Republicans continue to insist that they will refuse to discuss any potential Supreme Court nominee, and yesterday President Obama called their bluff by nominating Merrick Garland to fill the vacancy created by the death of Judge Antonin Scalia. The White House is keeping the GOP backed firmly into its corner by pushing a nominee whose qualifications are difficult to ignore.

Elsewhere, the Washington Post takes a deeper dive into Garland’s background, and Colorado’s Congressional delegation appears to be solidly divided on partisan lines.

 

Republicans are still in full panic mode over the likelihood that Donald Trump will capture the GOP Presidential nomination, but will the Republican Party really reject its own voters by trying to force a “brokered convention” in Cleveland?

The Aurora Sentinel picks up on the re-election concerns of Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Aurora):

…The GOP party faithful here are worried whether Donald Trump as their party’s presidential nominee will dump a bucket of Goldwater on Republican candidates down the ticket. They’re hoping the country isn’t going to party like it’s 1964, when the famous Arizona senator practically single-handedly handed complete control of the government over to the Democrats. For those of us who remember the “Daisy” ad what seemed like crazy talk back then, Quid speaks for most of those saying to the Trump, “Donald, you’re no Barry Goldwater.”

But Republican electeds all over the state, once whimsical about Making America something something something are now worried that if Trump snags the nomination, an anti-Trump electorate could trample anything that ends in -R, including a Colorado Senator, Congressman Mike Coffman and possibly Congressman Ken Buck.

 

Get even more smarter after the jump…

IN CASE YOU ARE STANDING NEAR A WATER COOLER…

► Legislation aimed at prohibiting the practice of so-called “conversion therapy” for gays and lesbians has passed out of the State House. From a press release issued by One Colorado:

One Colorado, the state’s leading advocacy organization for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Coloradans and their families, released the following statement from Executive Director Dave Montez on the passage of the Prohibition on Conversion Therapy, House Bill 1210, by the by the Colorado House of Representatives today with bipartisan support.

“So-called ‘conversion therapy’ includes a range of dangerous and discredited practices aimed at changing a person’s sexual orientation or suppressing a person’s gender identity and is based on the false claim that being lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) is a mental illness that should be cured or changed. While every mainstream mental and medical professional association in the country has discounted this practice, some Colorado legislators repeatedly made distasteful and scientifically dubious claims about sexual orientation during the committee hearing and on the floor.

“Comparing LGBT Coloradans to alcoholics and drug addicts in an attempt to claim that LGBT people should be forced to change who they are is not only offensive – it’s dangerous. Young LGBT Coloradans are 6 times more likely to attempt suicide than their straight peers – not because of who they are – but because of the rejection, harassment, and insensitive remarks they hear every day. Subjecting Colorado’s young people to conversion therapy only increases this risk.” [Pols emphasis]

We’re looking at you, Rep. Kathleen Conti.

 

► Republican Presidential frontrunner Donald Trump is increasingly turning his attention toward Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton. Hence this ultra-classy video asserting that Clinton is a “barking dog” on foreign policy.

 

► Parents of students at a middle school in Pueblo County are rightfully concerned about a “militia class” that includes training with live weapons.

 

► Whatever they’re smoking over at the Presidential campaign of Sen. Ted Cruz…pass some over here. From “The Fix”:

Even as Donald Trump was dominating in four of the five states that voted on Tuesday night (aka Super Tuesday part 8), Ted Cruz’s campaign was selling a very different narrative: That the Texas Senator had a path not only to be the party’s nominee but that he could actually could cinch the nomination on June 7, the final day of the primary campaign, or, at the very least, end up with a plurality of delegates heading into the convention.

“Not only can Cruz achieve a majority of delegates before the July convention, our projections indicate the Senator has a clear and realistic path to achieve 1,262 delegates while Trump is most likely to receive a total of 827 delegates,” wrote Chris Wilson, the director of research and analytics for Cruz’s campaign, in a memo sent to out Tuesday night. “This remains true regardless of all likely scenarios that may result on March 15th, and it remains true even if Marco Rubio and/or John Kasich remain in the race through March 22nd, effectively allowing Donald Trump to win Arizona.”

Hmmmmm.

All Cruz has to do to prove this scenario is to win 80 percent of the remaining Republican delegates up for grabs. No biggie.

 

► New details are emerging in the 2013 shooting death of former Department of Corrections Executive Director Tom Clements. As Kirk Mitchell reports for the Denver Post:

Three years after Colorado’s prisons chief was gunned down on his doorstep, two former top law enforcement officials who investigated the case say the killing was part of a conspiracy involving members of a white supremacist prison gang.

But neither the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office nor local prosecutors have yet done what federal officials did: blame the killing on parolee Evan Ebel. He died in a shootout with Texas lawmen two days after Tom Clements’ murder on March 19, 2013.

The only person charged in the case was the  woman who bought the murder weapon for Ebel, who also killed Commerce City resident Nathan Leon on March 17.

 

► Congressman Ken Buck (R-Greeley) is introducing legislation crassly titled “Blue Lives Matter” that would make the targeted killing of police officers a “hate crime.”

 

9News considers whether or not Colorado Republicans could play a significant role in a “brokered convention” when the Republican National Committee meets in Cleveland this summer.

 

OTHER LINKS YOU SHOULD CLICK

► Senate Republicans continue to push a requirement for photo identification when voting or registering to vote in Colorado. Nevermind that years of frantically overturning rocks by Republicans has yet to uncover any significant cases of voter fraud in our state.

 

► Add this to the list of head-scratching decisions made by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission in recent years.

ICYMI

► The difference between the Republican and Democratic parties has never been more stark, writes Ezra Klein for Vox.

 

Get More Smarter by liking Colorado Pols on Facebook!

 

Comments

18 thoughts on “Get More Smarter on St. Patrick’s Day (March 17)

    1. Just in general? Hell no to what?  Which topics are you responding to? Oh wait. That's right It doesn't matter. Whatever ColPols said…. hell no.

  1. A long time ago I worked for Public Service Co. and I own 800 shares of Xcel.  Tell me — is the PUC swilling down the fracking fluid again?  Xcel is actually trying to help ease the world's greatest crisis and the PUC sneers "Let them eat coal."  As an ex-employee and stockholder, I'm proud of my company.  As a Colorado voter, I'm appalled.  Somewhere, the Koch Brothers are laughing their asses off.

    1. The Denver Post's article yesterday put a quite different spin on the topic — this was a non-competitive agreement that would cost rate payers significantly more than an earlier competitive bid agreement that was apparently dropped by Xcel:

      "Rather than utilize the commission-approved competitive process, the parties filed a settlement that is not in the public interest," PUC chairman Joshua Epel said in a statement.

      Xcel Energy last month struck a deal with SunShare, Clean Energy Collective and Community Energy to buy power from new community solar gardens with up to 60 megawatts of capacity that they developed.

      The state's largest utility agreed to pay a renewable energy credit, or REC, of 0.3 cents per kilowatt hour for the power that came back onto its grid, a cost that the commission said would pass back to ratepayers systemwide. Last fall, those same solar developers in a competitive bidding process agreed to "negative" RECs, meaning they would pay Xcel Energy instead of the other way around.

      The PUC staff estimated that last month's agreement would cost rate payers hundreds of thousands of dollars per garden built and that the utility would need to go through a commission-approved competitive bidding process.

      http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_29647370/colorado-puc-shoots-down-xcels-community-solar-garden

      This discussion between Xcel, the Solar companies and the PUC is far from over.  I suspect like any negotiation, there will be an eventual agreement somewhere in between the two positions.

      1. It is indeed a different perspective, Davey. But it seems to say the PUC wants the solar people to pay xcel for the privilege of giving its power to xcel for free.  How is that fair to the solar folks?

        1. The REC is priced, like oil, by the market.  It went negative because the cost of solar is dropping rapidly.   Lower producer costs mean higher profits. All industries like to protect profits and subsidies. So subsidies (which is what the REC is) like oil industry subsidies only survive through sweetheart deals that undercut the free market forces that otherwise would eliminate them.

          1. That is basic economics.  But so is the fact that a negative rate loses money.  Why wouldn't the solar ptovider make more money — or at least cut its loses — by simply shutting down rather than paying xcel to take its product. In your exaample, I'd  certainly leave oil in the ground before I would pay someone to pump it out. Is the provider being paid by the ultimate customer and xcel just compensated for using its grid?  That would make sense.

  2. Buck is very late to the blue lives matter cause.  For many years, Colorado law has listed murder of a peace officer as an aggravating factor that can, in and of itself, justify a death penalty.  

    1. ps, as far as making murder of a peace officer a hate crime, this is the worst kind of empty bombast.  Colorado law allows only two choices for someone convicted of murdering a peace officer: life without parole or the death penalty.  Hate crime laws provide for enhanced penalties.  How do you enhance life without parole or execution?  Pee on the killer's grave?  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

89 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!