(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
The director of Planned Parenthood in Colorado said yesterday her organization will “fight like hell” against plans by Republicans, announced by U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), to de-fund Planned Parenthood as part of the bill to repeal Obamacare.
“Defunding Planned Parenthood is bad for the people of Colorado, New Mexico, Southern Nevada and Wyoming, and would result in a self-inflicted public health crisis,” said Vicki Cowart, President of Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, in a statement.
“Women and men will not let politicians play games with their health care,” she said. “We will work alongside other Planned Parenthood affiliates and our coalition partners across the country to fight like hell against this.”
To try to stop the Republicans de-funding efforts, which are part of the bill to repeal Obamacare, Planned Parenthood has launched a campaign called #IStandWithPlannedParenthood. It includes events across the country, a petition, political action, and other activities.
Planned Parenthood funding has long been a target of Republicans, who are upset that the organization offers abortion services, even though federal funds cannot be used by law to provide abortion.
U.S. Rep. Mike Coffman, for example, has voted six times to defund the organization over the years. But probably due to the fact that a large majority of women have a favorable view of Planned Parenthood, Coffman has also tried to market himself as a friend of Planned Parenthood, even presenting the organizations logo in a campaign ad.
But with Republicans about to control Congress and the White House, political observers say Planned Parenthood is at serious risk of losing some $400 million in federal funds, mostly from Medicaid, the healthcare program for the poor. At least one Republican Senator, Susan Collins of Maine, has objected to Planned Parenthood defunding in the past.
Losing federal funds could force Planned Parenthood nationally to turn away hundreds of thousands of low-income men and women, who rely on the organization’s clinics for basic health services like cancer screenings and birth control, according to Planned Parenthood.
In many parts of the country, particularly in rural areas, it would be difficult, if not impossible, for some Planned Parenthood patients to get health care elsewhere, resulting in serious health impacts, according to Planned Parenthood officials.
For example, in Texas, defunding Planned Parenthood would result in, among other things, a 27 percent increase in births among women who use injectable contraception, according to one study.
No one’s evaluated the full impact in Colorado if Planned Parenthood lost federal funding, but Planned Parenthood officials have said cuts would leave about 80,000 low-income people or more statewide in need of a new clinic.
At the Arvada clinic, for example, about 1000 patients would likely be turned away. In Aurora, over 2,000 could be forced to find healthcare elsewhere.
Even if they could theoretically access another clinic, Planned Parenthood patients may not be able to get to it, due to transportation problems, which, as a practical matter, frequently determine whether low-income people get health care at all.
Without Planned Parenthood, wait lists could also lengthen at clinics for low-income people.
Another issue is the preferences of patients. Some women, in the midst of domestic disputes or facing cultural or social complications, seek out Planned Parenthood because the organization takes special care to respect women’s privacy and to be sensitive to the medical as well as social needs of patients, according to Planned Parenthood supporters.
ProgressNow has announced a rally against the Obamacare repeal, which would include the Planned Parenthood de-funding measure, at Sen. Cory Gardner’s (R-CO) office in Denver Tuesday, Jan. 10, at noon.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
They can't specifically prevent Planned Parenthood from participating in federal health care programs, as that would be a bill of attainder.
If they prevent any abortion provider from participating in federal health care programs, that would ensnare private doctors and all hospitals as well, besides just Big Pink.
How courts interpret the government's ability to exclude providers from a pool of federal dollars to provide non-abortion services to one group of patients because they provide a constitutionally protected healthcare service to another group of patients who pay with their own money is where this would get sorted out.
Any nonsense about how Medicaid subsidizes abortion ignores the economic reality that it pays like crap (does your private doc accept it?) and abortion is a scarce cash-pay procedure sought on the open market. If Planned Parenthood can't provide preventive services to poor women, their abortion volume will increase.
The Second Circuit rejected the claim that defunding Acorn (which was specifically named) was an unconstitutional bill of attainder.
And it will only take a few days for the GOP-controlled Congress to put a ninth justice on the Supreme (Kangaroo) Court that will then rubber stamp any right-wing opinion of a lower court as needed.
Actually, I’m being premature — replacing Scalia with another right-winger just restores the rightward tilt. It’ll take replacing one of the other moderate members to fully slant it to Kangaroo status.