President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 25, 2017 11:20 AM UTC

Your Mailbox Is Full: Cory Gardner Still Ignoring Constituents

  • 3 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Our friend Jason Salzman took note last weekend of the fact that Sen. Cory Gardner’s voicemail boxes have been either consistently filled or the phones have gone entirely unanswered at most if not all of his regional offices and his main office in Washington, D.C. for many days now. A huge uptick in citizen inquiries about the fate of health reform and other issues have flooded congressional offices since the beginning of the year, but Gardner and Rep. Mike Coffman of Aurora in particular seem to be having bigger problems than others in responding–or even getting the message.

As the Durango Herald’s Jonathan Romeo reports, the trouble getting ahold of Gardner’s staff continues–and constituents are not happy about it:

Since the election and subsequent inauguration of President Donald Trump, many of those in attendance Tuesday have called their locally elected officials to express a range of concerns.

Most people standing outside Gardner’s office near Office Depot said such things as Trump’s nominees for key Cabinet positions, environmental policies and basic human rights have prompted them to call or write at least once a week.

All said Gardner has failed to respond in any meaningful way – in contrast to Congressman Scott Tipton, a Republican, and Sen. Michael Bennet, a Democrat – and that attempts to contact a representative in the Durango office have continually been unsuccessful. [Pols emphasis]

“I just don’t understand why Cory Gardner is not responding to the people he’s supposed to represent,” said Gail Harriss, a Durango resident. “Especially when time is of the essence with Trump’s nominees.”

Romeo quotes Sen. Gardner’s spokesman complaining about a large volume of calls from “New York and California” that they allegedly have to sort through in order to respond to bonafide Colorado constituents. But that doesn’t explain the inability for constituents to get through at the local offices, which generally aren’t targeted by out-of-state campaigns. And obviously if constituents can’t even leave a message, Gardner can’t claim they’re “sorting through” anything.

And perhaps most importantly, other representatives aren’t having the same problems.

This is not something we would take lightly if we were on Sen Gardner’s staff. Bad constituent relations, especially at a moment of high drama like we’re seeing today as the Trump administration sets to work on an agenda that has millions of Americans genuinely frightened about the future, is the kind of thing voters remember in elections–even elections that are still a few years away.

If Gardner cements a reputation for ignoring his constituents back home while backing Trump’s controversial moves in Washington, it could well come back to haunt him.

Comments

3 thoughts on “Your Mailbox Is Full: Cory Gardner Still Ignoring Constituents

  1. Let's see if we can state the painfully obvious one more time, clearly and succinctly:

    Comrades Gardner and Coffman are representatives ONLY OF/FOR THE PEOPLE OF WHOM THEY APPROVE (meaning their brain-dead sycophantic supporters and corporate leash-holders, and the Denver Post editorial board). They resolutely, steadfastly, categorically DO NOT and WILL NOT represent, and NEVER HAVE represented, any one else, ever.

    There, I think that's got it.

  2. I used Gardner's website to leave a message about not destroying our healthcare system by repealing the ACA.  After a few days, I did get a boilerplate email filled with his "Alternative Facts" regarding Obamacare: "Policy cancellations! Premiums Rising! Gummit Takeover of Healtcare !!!!"  Followed by all the debunked GOP talking points: Keep the Good Stuff, Repeal the Bad Stuff, Have Cheap Shit Scam Artists in other States sell you a junk policy, etc and premiums will come plummeting down!

    Funny how he forgot to mention anything about his plan for screwing Medicaid patients or how many people will lose their coverage when insurance companies withdraw from the market, and how pre-existing conditions won't be covered if you have a gap in maintaining continuous coverage, etc.  And of course the standard "Prevent Malpractice Suits" — hey, you didn't need that kidney, you got a spare, right?

    But according to Cory, The Free Market Shall Rise Again!

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

212 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!