President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
April 19, 2017 10:53 AM UTC
16 Comments
So should he turn the money down if it comes from out of state?
No, but he shoulda saved it for Q2 of his campaign. Far better to raise what you can locally first, and then use that to leverage outside support. Rookie mistake.
Or, that's how his income is going to look throughout the race, so why be sly? Mike has money here, but probably much more money outside.
Also fun to see that John Morse is doing his accounting.
Ed Perlmutter owns Colorado Pols. Cary Kennedy and Mike Johnston both know it now!
Okay, Ed. Now we have to kill him
Moldy – I could smell your desperation in Pueblo standing in a shit pile at Five Rivers Feedlot in Yuma County.
Pols apparently does not like success even for Democrats.
He hasn't succeeded yet, stupid one. Success is when a decent person crushes a racist shitbag like you in the general election. Tee hee.
Because of SB10-191, I was already not supportive of Johnston. The fundraising story just cements it for me.
What don't you like about 191, Corky?
your concern for campaign funds far outweighs its importance (well, to everyone but those who make a buck selling advice – good, bad and worse – to rudderless politicians) to voters and in policy by helping the best team win.
It guarantees nothing and signifies nothing.
Your guy MB proved that, without doubt, these last several election cycles.
You guys should track Democratic policies, what the people really want, and push the politicians to enact them. You should quit this triangulation/failure reinforcement pattern and this whimpering at the sight of a Republican Willing to Lie About Anything and Everything Who Might Call Me a Bad Name.
Other than the fact that you were able to get another utterly off point insult to Michael Bennett, would you mind explaining what you tried to say there, Zappy?
V
That is Zapps only point.
I have to say if Johnston's only selling point is "I'm an educrat.", he's in the wrong race. There are an awful lot of Dems who aren't very keen on some of the education "reforms" that have been put in place starting with Bill Owens' tenure in the Gov's office.
Being an educrat worked for Michael Bennet. But then, that was an appointment, not an election. You're right, cook.
The problem with some of the education reforms, and teacher evaluation per SB191 being based 50% on score growth, is that whether kid's scores go up or not is so much a crapshoot. It depends on the kids you get that year, and whether they are motivated or burned out or opting out or what's going on at home. There were 2 years in which I earned a bonus because my student's reading scores increased more than expected; yet, I'd be hard put to say what I did differently that year than any other year. It was the kids.