President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 06, 2009 05:15 PM UTC

Death Penalty Repeal's Last Stand

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE #3: House Bill 1274 fails Senate by one vote.

UPDATE #2: Ritter breaks silence, essentially says he will veto House Bill 1274 as presently written. Developing.

UPDATE: Rumors of the death penalty ban’s demise appear to have been exaggerated, breaking Denver Post:

Lawmakers this morning put a ban on the death penalty back into a bill providing funding to solve cold case murders, setting up their colleagues for politically tricky votes on the controversial topic on the final day of the session.

The House in April passed by one vote the original version of House Bill 1274, which would have ended capital punishment and used the savings to build a cold case task force within the Colorado Bureau of Investigations.

The Senate, which has not voted the death penalty up or down, earlier this week took out the death penalty ban and instead implemented a $2.50 fee on anyone convicted of a traffic, misdemeanor or felony offense to pay for grants to local police jurisdictions.

Final votes coming. Original post follows.

AP reports:

The fight over a proposal to abolish the death penalty in Colorado is going down to the wire.

State lawmakers plan to meet this morning, the final day of the legislative session, to decide whether to revive a bill that originally would have ended the death penalty and used the savings to fund a statewide cold case unit.

That bill unraveled this week in the Senate where lawmakers voted to scrap the death penalty ban and instead impose a series of new fees to fund investigations of unsolved cases.

The original bill is sponsored by Rep. Paul Weissmann, D-Boulder, and Sen. Morgan Carroll, D-Aurora, both strong opponents of the death penalty. They expect the conference committee appointed by House and Senate leaders to work out the differences between the chambers will recommend putting the death penalty ban back in the bill. They think the fines to fund cold cases mainly on the local level could also be included.

“The debate isn’t over. This bill isn’t over,” Carroll said.

Liberal activist group Progress Now, one of the main proponents of House Bill 1274, sent a blast email out last night with targets to call and a strong “it isn’t over yet” message. What are the odds of reverting the bill to its original language, folks? Get your predictions in quick, we’ll know how you did in a few hours.

Tweet
Share

Comments

18 thoughts on “Death Penalty Repeal’s Last Stand”

  1. I hate to disagree with Carroll because I am in favor of this bill but the debate really is over and so is the bill.

    And I’ll be quite happy to be proven wrong.  

  2. Only a call from the Governor will save it.  I think Ritter would be happy to see this issue go away so that he has more time to waffle and equivocate.

    1. Is trying to figure out just how furious they are with the Governor right now. He has screwed a LOT of people in the last 48 hours, and we’ll be talking about it long after the session.

      1. …after the conference committee released its now-doomed version?  Of course, he may have been in contact with the relevant players before then.

  4. …doh!  Does Ritter now wish he’d stayed silent?  Or was his late public opposition to the bill necessary to gather all the “no” votes in the Senate?

        1. between the chicken and the pig in a breakfast of ham and eggs. The chicken is involved, but the pig is committed. RSB is involved but you’d have to admit, I’m committed.

          Thank you very much.

    2.    IIRC, Mary Hodge sat on the Appropriations Committee which approved the original bill on a party line.  She give any reason for pulling a Bob Beauprez?

    3. Let’s just put these pro-death Democrats on my permanent list of people I will never vote for regardless of their opposition.

  6. Way to go out on a limb there and only stake out a real position when you absolutely had no other choice.

    Honestly, if he had just come out and said, “I don’t support this, I’m going to veto it” from the outset I would have been mad, but I would have at least been left with a modicum of respect for the man.

    Ritter right now has two things he can tout: New Energy Economy, and FASTER. That’s about it. He may get lucky and the economy may be in full-on recovery by the time November 2010 rolls around, which could be the only thing saving him from being run out of office by Democrats, Republicans and independents.

    One thing is going to be certain in 2010: Democrats are not going to be excited. Neither Bennet nor Ritter are generating much of anything past lukewarm, polite acceptance.

    Republican activists, on the other hand, are going to be out in force. They’re candidates suck, but in retrospect, didn’t Ritter kind of suck in 2006?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

118 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!