U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 22, 2005 08:00 AM UTC

Friday Open Thread

  • 19 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’ll have more later…

Comments

19 thoughts on “Friday Open Thread

  1. I hope so…because then Beauprez will have a hell of a chance winning statewide. He would barely pull votes from his own 7th. Holtzman would fair well against McGinnis.

  2. GiGi Dennis in the 3rd.  There will be a primary – perhaps even a 3-way.

    There is no love lost between Scott and Beauprez, and since it appears that BB is foundering against Holtzman, that could induce Scott to go ahead and get in the race

  3. “foundering against Holtzman”  It seems way to early to be saying that.  He outraised him in his first quarter and is picking up endorsements.  Granted, MH has more money, but I wouldn’t say either in “foundering.” 

    McInnis has waited too long.

  4. Anyone who thinks SM has any shot at all is drinking the same Koolaid as BB (the poster, not the candidate).

    Roger – define “foundering.”  And no fair using the lines on this site as evidence.

    BB – you really think BB (the candidate) is going to have trouble pulling votes from the 7th (other than yours)?  Elaborate.

  5. Hey.
    It’s been a whole 24 hours since MH changed his logo.  He must be losing steam.
    Come to think of it, its been a while since he released news about a new celebrity “friend” too. Hmmmm

  6. Foundering:

    If  you are the annointed front runner expectations are much higher and the measurement bar of success is also higher.

    If you can’t put your only opponent away; if you can’t appear to be leaving him in his tracks; if you can’t beat him  at the money game (total dollars are all that count), I call that foundering.

    If  BB was all that everyone touts him to be, Holtzman should not still be in the game – but he is and he is arguably besting BB at this point.

    I know it is a long way to August of 2006, but it is uphill for BB at this point.

    I have said privately to others that I always thought that at the end of the day, Holtzman would be the nominee if it was a head to head race between he and BB.  If Scott does indeed get in the race, the edge goes to Holtzman in a 3-way race.

  7. Owens is in a box on the temporary SOS position.  The only “safe” appointment would be someone like Natalie Meyer — who definitely will not be tempted to stay in the job when Mike Coffman comes home.

    Forget the guy in Larimer County.  He, like Norma Anderson, would like to run for the job in 2006. 

    For this reason, do not expect anyone who is currently in office and planning on staying in some office.  Owens has ticked off the rank and file Republicans already with C & D.  If he screws Mike Coffman, he will really have a lynch mob after him.

  8. Roger D – nice try. 

    1) “MH is ahead in total fundraising”

    You’re absolutely right – over a year before the primary.  Not to mention BB’s had that little thing called serving in Washington to keep him busy 5 days (sometimes 6 or 7) a week.  In case you missed it last week, BB outraised MH during the last quarter.  And, has to raise money to retire Congressional election debt as well as governor’s debt. 

    I’ll make you a bet – I’ll be you a shiny nickel that BB ourraises MH in every quarter between now and the primary.  I’ll bet you an additional shiny nickel that his margin of fundraising victory increases with each consecutive quarter.  I’ll even give you odds – let’s say 4-1.

    2) “If BB was all that everyone touts him to be, Holtzman should not still be in the game – but he is and he is arguably besting BB at this point.”

    How exactly is BB supposed to “put MH away” – in lieu of an actual convention, primary or general election?  Is there a step in the electoral process I’ve missed all these years?  some sort of exhibition match?

    3)”he is arguably besting BB at this point.”

    Really?  How so?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

107 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!