U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
July 01, 2009 09:27 PM UTC
10 Comments
Even if they hadn’t completely destroyed their credibility in 2008, the NRCC would still be pretty weak right now just because it’s an off year.
Why are they wasting money on crap like this? People hate getting robocalled, and anyone who would watch an anti-Markey NRCC ad online would probably never vote for Markey anyway.
This is just another sign, IMO, that the establishment Republicans have no idea how to use technology.
has been splashed across Colorado Pols too.
As to career ending votes – EFCA sponsorship – didn’t Larimer or Weld vote down some rediculous Union Boss employment measure a cycle or two ago?
call it by its name without getting in some spin, would you now?
The average voter doesn’t understand cap and trade. Career-ending votes are those that deal with very clear, unambiguous issues that are easily explainable to voters. This is too complex of an issue to be anything close to career-ending for anyone.
Posted a resopnse to the NRCC robo-calls and ads: http://mediamattersaction.org/…
MM claims it would add jobs, but I don’t think that’s true. It might add “green” jobs, but would cost more standard jobs. [emphasis mine]
trying to sell something along these lines not too long ago?
If you are looking for some talking points to copy & paste that are, you know, applicable to this country, you should try and dig it up.
Spain has destroyed their own economy by doing many similar things to what Obama’s proposing.
that today’s economy is the same as tomorrow’s economy. That won’t be true on a number of accounts. One, oil prices will continue to rise and carbon intensive jobs will become more expensive regardless. Two, ACES will use a market based approach to include the price of environmental externalities (re: rising sea levels and changing precipitation patterns) which will cost more jobs if unaccounted for. Really, if you believe in the free-market, you support ACES or something like it (carbon tax anyone?), pure and simple. If you believe in effective public subsidies for corporations that hurt our competitiveness and put us behind in development of the new energy economy that the rest of the world is already adopting then fine. It’s crazy, but that’s fine.